But could anybody do a time measurement with a same (short) wu?
I would like to know a reference time for the official app and i would like to know a time for S5T0304 (it seems to be valid) or S5T0305 (i will upload soon).
I expect they have bigger speed improvement than 10%...
S5T0303 - long WU - checked,
)
S5T0303 - long WU - checked, but no consensus yet.
result
Athlon 64 X2 4800+
same here S5T0303 - long WU -
)
same here S5T0303 - long WU - checked, but no consensus yet.
result
Athlon 64 X2 4800+
will try S5T0304 next
It would be great if
)
It would be great if something like S5T0303 produced valid results. It is 20+% faster on this system.
RE: It would be great if
)
Same performance Here from 30000sec to 26000sec...
Great Jobs Akos!!!
regards,
Almost great, very very
)
Almost great, very very nearly great ... until these S5T0303 WU's validate, which they currently don't.
S5T0304 - short WU - valid
)
S5T0304 - short WU - valid with standard app used for the other result.
result
Athlon XP 2800
This result on a long WU for
)
This result on a long WU for S5T0003 is valid
For me, a time difference of almost an hour on Pent4, 2.8Ghz, SSE3, no HT
will try going to the S5T0304 next
Dual Athlon MP 2000+ First
)
Dual Athlon MP 2000+
First result with S5T0000 is valid. No significant speed increase over standard 4.02 app (as expected).
-- Tony
Results 34739234 and
)
Results 34739234 and 34739245] done with T0302 and both are "Checked, but no consensus yet". Going back to T0301.
Thanks for all... But
)
Thanks for all...
But could anybody do a time measurement with a same (short) wu?
I would like to know a reference time for the official app and i would like to know a time for S5T0304 (it seems to be valid) or S5T0305 (i will upload soon).
I expect they have bigger speed improvement than 10%...