The last patches are for SSE, can this later be put into the original client?
I don't understand the question exactly.
It will not work with newer official applications, but the patches don't have time limits or patching sequences, so you can use each patch any time on the official app.
hmm does anyone know if the newer SSE Versions will be better for SSE3 Systems also or should one better use the "older" 301 SSE3 version?
And Akos, do you see a chance for talking with the project leaders about your idea of minimizing the fpu -> memory things where only one bit in the result is different?
(i mean sometime, dont feel like you have to hurry, we are all happy for what you do here and understand you dont have so much time very well)
hmm does anyone know if the newer SSE Versions will be better for SSE3 Systems also or should one better use the "older" 301 SSE3 version?
I will do a SSE3 version from 0307, but i would like to get some results with 0308 at first.
Quote:
And Akos, do you see a chance for talking with the project leaders about your idea of minimizing the fpu -> memory things where only one bit in the result is different?
I send a mail to Bernd in connection with this thing.
standard app / 3140,11 sec
)
standard app / 3140,11 sec / 52,3min / result
S5T0301 SSE3 / 2724,88 sec / 45,4min / result
S5T0304 SSE / 2964,55 sec / 49,4min / result
S5T0305 SSE / 2845,25 sec / 47,4min / result
S5T0307 SSE / 2651,69 sec / 44,2min / result
All Results are valid.
gain:
S5T0301 = 15,2%
S5T0304 = 5,9%
S5T0305 = 10,4%
S5T0307 = 18,4%
System: Dualcore Opteron 170 @ 2,6 GHz
@akosf: The last patches
)
@akosf:
The last patches are for SSE, can this later be put into the original client?
RE: @akosf: The last
)
I don't understand the question exactly.
It will not work with newer official applications, but the patches don't have time limits or patching sequences, so you can use each patch any time on the official app.
RE: S5T0307 SSE
)
Thanks!
So, S5T0307 will be the next stable version...
hmm does anyone know if the
)
hmm does anyone know if the newer SSE Versions will be better for SSE3 Systems also or should one better use the "older" 301 SSE3 version?
And Akos, do you see a chance for talking with the project leaders about your idea of minimizing the fpu -> memory things where only one bit in the result is different?
(i mean sometime, dont feel like you have to hurry, we are all happy for what you do here and understand you dont have so much time very well)
RE: hmm does anyone know if
)
See this post. It seems that 0307 is better as 0301. But why you don't try it on your machine?
S5T0308 SSE / 2431,00 sec
)
S5T0308 SSE / 2431,00 sec / 40,5min / result
S5T0308 SSE / 2466,48 sec / 41,1min / result
S5T0308 is very fast, but the results seemed to be invalid :-/
RE: hmm does anyone know if
)
I will do a SSE3 version from 0307, but i would like to get some results with 0308 at first.
I send a mail to Bernd in connection with this thing.
RE: S5T0308 SSE / 2431,00
)
Thanks!
So, I'm sure the validator works with zero tolerance... :-(
Bad news... we cannot reach much bigger speed-up.
RE: standard app /
)
I can also validate S5T0301. Just switched to S5T0307. Will report back in about 8 hours. I am enjoying this:-)