I think the official app could be about 2 times faster than the current speed. There are lots of needless FPU -> memory -> FPU operations, but i could not remove them because these movements change the last bit of the numbers ( only one bit! ).
The results would be better ( the last bit would be also good ) without these movements and the app would be more faster, but... the current S5 validator doesn't accept these ( better, faster ) results.
I dont find the post where you wrote this and just quote from pepperammi but:
I also think you could talk with the project leaders about this, can't you?
I suppose they would either explain you why they can't change this or or again listen to your good advice :)
I dont find the post where you wrote this and just quote from pepperammi but:
I also think you could talk with the project leaders about this, can't you?
I suppose they would either explain you why they can't change this or or again listen to your good advice :)
It's here.http://einsteinathome.org/node/191443
Sorry i wasn't too sure my post belonged in that thread so put it here. Sorry if shouldn't have.
I wouldn't want to start interfering myself. I'll leave it to the people who know a lot more what they're talking about :)
With 0304 i have 6 valid short WUs on an XP3200+
Now i test 0307.
0304 is arround 8-9% faster on this maschine than the standard app.
0303 on my A64 is arround 10-12% faster than standard app. but brings no good WUs. Checked, but no consensus yet
http://einsteinathome.org/workunit/10104420
Again have to wait till the other person return result. First few % S5T0001 rest with S5T0301. Will move up to more recent patch when all these finally get verdict on validation.
S5T0003: seeing results in range 53033-57580 seconds compared to range 58339-59193 with stock app on dual processor P3 1266, all on WUs for h1_0600.5. All validating. That's about 8-10% improvement I think. Now onto S5T0307. Mike
RE: I think the official
)
I dont find the post where you wrote this and just quote from pepperammi but:
I also think you could talk with the project leaders about this, can't you?
I suppose they would either explain you why they can't change this or or again listen to your good advice :)
RE: I dont find the post
)
It's here.http://einsteinathome.org/node/191443
Sorry i wasn't too sure my post belonged in that thread so put it here. Sorry if shouldn't have.
I wouldn't want to start interfering myself. I'll leave it to the people who know a lot more what they're talking about :)
With 0304 i have 6 valid
)
With 0304 i have 6 valid short WUs on an XP3200+
Now i test 0307.
0304 is arround 8-9% faster on this maschine than the standard app.
0303 on my A64 is arround 10-12% faster than standard app. but brings no good WUs. Checked, but no consensus yet
Athlon
It´s nice to be part of this community :-(
Stay tuned and keep crunching
http://einstein.phys.uwm.edu/
)
http://einsteinathome.org/workunit/10104420
Again have to wait till the other person return result. First few % S5T0001 rest with S5T0301. Will move up to more recent patch when all these finally get verdict on validation.
S5T0003: seeing results in
)
S5T0003: seeing results in range 53033-57580 seconds compared to range 58339-59193 with stock app on dual processor P3 1266, all on WUs for h1_0600.5. All validating. That's about 8-10% improvement I think. Now onto S5T0307. Mike
So, i could estimate the time
)
So, i could estimate the time on the same wu:
S5T0000: 38721 sec
S5T0307: 33304 sec
gain: 38721 / 33304 = 1,163
CPU: Sempron E6 1600 MHz
In 1h i have a good
)
In 1h i have a good comparison between standard app, S5T0301, S5T0304, S5T0305, S5T0307.
RE: So, i could estimate
)
How I can verify correctness of results from opti app. The size of files are the same as from orginal app, but on same bytes are different?
RE: How I can verify
)
You cannot check it. You should send back the results to the validator, so you need different wus for validation tests.
RE: S5T0308.dat -
)