S5T0308 SSE / 2431,00 sec / 40,5min / result
S5T0308 SSE / 2466,48 sec / 41,1min / result
S5T0308 is very fast, but the results seemed to be invalid :-/
Thanks!
So, I'm sure the validator works with zero tolerance... :-(
Bad news... we cannot reach much bigger speed-up.
Version S5T0308 produce output file with diferent size as original app (and other tested optimalization)!!! So I'm not sure if the problem is in validator or in this version of app.
Try to use S5S0007, it will give you about 15% speed-up.
Right. I first checked thi thread and noticed you mentioned next stable release. Only later I checked the other thread and noticed the latest link.
I'm running the S5S0007 now ... another two long WUs ahead (the first one half done uing S5S0003 and slightly touched by S5T0307). I'll be back ... tomorrow ;)
Odd question. On a dual core or hyper threaded machine
Is it possible to enter a patched version into one of the 'slots' in the boinc file directory and a different patched version into another 'slot' and run them. If that is possible i can test two versions at once and only one maybe unstable- avoid ruining two units.
I supposse then (if it is possible) you might ae able to copy a wu into two slot2 and run standard app and patch app at same time for a comparison?
would have to run cache out before even trying this but is it possible?
i have the same idea, but i did't test it.
Try it and tell us :)
:-)
It'll be tomorrow before i run my cache out and i'll give it a go but i'll make a backupof everything now and give the two patched versions idea a try in a minute.
Anyone knows better please let me know before i waste my time and/or mess things up.
Odd question. On a dual core or hyper threaded machine
Is it possible to enter a patched version into one of the 'slots' in the boinc file directory and a different patched version into another 'slot' and run them. If that is possible i can test two versions at once and only one maybe unstable- avoid ruining two units.
If you're willing to try: in slot directory (slots/0 or something) you have file with name einstein_S5R1_4.02_windows_intelx86.exe. This implies executable but it's rather an XML file saying it's a soft link pointing to real executable.
I wonder what happens if you replace this XML file with a real executable? Is BOINC CC smar enough to notice it and run it directly or will it choke?
[edit]
Another idea: what if you simply edit the XML file to point to different executable?
RE: out of stderr.txt:
)
It's not OK!
I can read this in my stderr.txt: E@H S5R1 4.02 SSE3-0709 TEST
Perhaps, the file was wrong, eh...
Try to download again: S5T0709
RE: RE: S5T0308 SSE /
)
Version S5T0308 produce output file with diferent size as original app (and other tested optimalization)!!! So I'm not sure if the problem is in validator or in this version of app.
Hello
)
Hello S56RKO,
Try to use S5S0007, it will give you about 15% speed-up.
RE: Try to use S5S0007, it
)
Right. I first checked thi thread and noticed you mentioned next stable release. Only later I checked the other thread and noticed the latest link.
I'm running the S5S0007 now ... another two long WUs ahead (the first one half done uing S5S0003 and slightly touched by S5T0307). I'll be back ... tomorrow ;)
Metod ...
@akosf: isn't S5T0307 =
)
@akosf: isn't S5T0307 = S5S0007 ?
Now the stderr.txt (SSE3-0709) is correct :) THX !!!!
The speed is very good, times in 30min...
RE: @akosf: isn't S5T0307 =
)
The output text is different.
S -> Stable
T -> Test
Odd question. On a dual core
)
Odd question. On a dual core or hyper threaded machine
Is it possible to enter a patched version into one of the 'slots' in the boinc file directory and a different patched version into another 'slot' and run them. If that is possible i can test two versions at once and only one maybe unstable- avoid ruining two units.
I supposse then (if it is possible) you might ae able to copy a wu into two slot2 and run standard app and patch app at same time for a comparison?
would have to run cache out before even trying this but is it possible?
i have the same idea, but i
)
i have the same idea, but i did't test it.
Try it and tell us :)
RE: i have the same idea,
)
:-)
It'll be tomorrow before i run my cache out and i'll give it a go but i'll make a backupof everything now and give the two patched versions idea a try in a minute.
Anyone knows better please let me know before i waste my time and/or mess things up.
RE: Odd question. On a dual
)
If you're willing to try: in slot directory (slots/0 or something) you have file with name einstein_S5R1_4.02_windows_intelx86.exe. This implies executable but it's rather an XML file saying it's a soft link pointing to real executable.
I wonder what happens if you replace this XML file with a real executable? Is BOINC CC smar enough to notice it and run it directly or will it choke?
[edit]
Another idea: what if you simply edit the XML file to point to different executable?
Metod ...