Pentium4 2,66GHz, WinXPHome I used the patch working now on a short h1 Wu without patch duration 1h 51min with patch ~1h 31min 5.3.12.tx37 2006-06-23 04:36:28.7656 [normal]: E@H S5R1 4.02 SSE-0004 TEST 2006-06-23 04:36:28.7656 [normal]: Started search at lalDebugLevel = 0 2006-06-23 04:36:29.4531 [normal]: Checkpoint-file 'Fstat.out.ckp' not found. 2006-06-23 04:36:29.4531 [normal]: No usable checkpoint found, starting from beginning. Detected CPU type 1 2006-06-23 06:32:38.9218 [normal]: Search finished successfully. Validate state Checked, but no consensus yet Claimed credit 22.4068287037037 Granted credit 0 application version 4.02 with patch 115 min these are 4 min more. without patch 111 min That means not every cycle of 1 min is equal long !!! very interesting, but why ?
Pentium4 2,66GHz, WinXPHome I used the patch working now on a short h1 Wu without patch duration 1h 51min with patch ~1h 31min 5.3.12.tx37
2006-06-23 04:36:28.7656 [normal]: E@H S5R1 4.02 SSE-0004 TEST 2006-06-23 04:36:28.7656 [normal]: Started search at lalDebugLevel = 0 2006-06-23 04:36:29.4531 [normal]: Checkpoint-file 'Fstat.out.ckp' not found. 2006-06-23 04:36:29.4531 [normal]: No usable checkpoint found, starting from beginning. Detected CPU type 1 2006-06-23 06:32:38.9218 [normal]: Search finished successfully.
Validate state Checked, but no consensus yet Claimed credit 22.4068287037037 Granted credit 0 application version 4.02
with patch 115 min these are 4 min more. without patch 111 min That means not every cycle of 1 min is equal long !!! very interesting, but why ?
S5T0004 produces invalid results.
http://einsteinathome.org/task/34575100http://einsteinathome.org/task/34575098
S5T0004 produces invalid results. http://einsteinathome.org/task/34575100http://einsteinathome.org/task/34575098
Thanks.
Probably the validator works with very low tolerances.
First valid results with S5T0002.dat on a 2xAthlon MP2600+
No invalid ones so far, the others are pending / not checked yet.
I didn't patch cumulative btw.
Does it mean, we should stop using S5T0004?
S5T0000 on P D 830 3.2Ghzhttp://einsteinathome.org/task/34774177 - valid and credit granted.
Sorry i must have done something wrong first time and it didn't patch. Succefully patched now and finished first.Couple more in few hours
34712232 think would also be invalid. Only used S5T0004 for the last part.
I am getting the same problem with ST50004.
http://einsteinathome.org/task/34561017 Checked, but no consensus yet
This likely means that my result is invalid, since the other user is not using a patched client.
BTW, finding such problems is the purpose of this beta test!
So, can i assume this?
S5T0000: valid S5T0001: valid S5T0002: valid S5T0003: valid S5T0004: invalid
Did anybody find invalid result with S5T0000...S5T0003 ?
I'm getting several valid results with S5T0003.dat patched app.
Looks like 0003 may be good.
Cheers, Gary.
RE: Pentium4 2,66GHz,
)
S5T0004 produces invalid
)
S5T0004 produces invalid results.
http://einsteinathome.org/task/34575100
http://einsteinathome.org/task/34575098
RE: S5T0004 produces
)
Thanks.
Probably the validator works with very low tolerances.
First valid results with
)
First valid results with S5T0002.dat on a 2xAthlon MP2600+
No invalid ones so far, the others are pending / not checked yet.
I didn't patch cumulative btw.
RE: S5T0004 produces
)
Does it mean, we should stop using S5T0004?
S5T0000 on P D 830
)
S5T0000 on P D 830 3.2Ghz
http://einsteinathome.org/task/34774177 - valid and credit granted.
Sorry i must have done something wrong first time and it didn't patch. Succefully patched now and finished first.Couple more in few hours
34712232 think would also be
)
34712232 think would also be invalid. Only used S5T0004 for the last part.
RE: S5T0004 produces
)
I am getting the same problem with ST50004.
http://einsteinathome.org/task/34561017
Checked, but no consensus yet
This likely means that my result is invalid, since the other user is not using a patched client.
BTW, finding such problems is the purpose of this beta test!
So, can i assume
)
So, can i assume this?
S5T0000: valid
S5T0001: valid
S5T0002: valid
S5T0003: valid
S5T0004: invalid
Did anybody find invalid result with S5T0000...S5T0003 ?
I'm getting several valid
)
I'm getting several valid results with S5T0003.dat patched app.
Looks like 0003 may be good.
Cheers,
Gary.