Optomized S5 SSE3

Rafael Cesare Valente "CrackBoy"
Rafael Cesare V...
Joined: 22 Apr 06
Posts: 22
Credit: 122,573
RAC: 0

Akos... The S5T0004 is


The S5T0004 is giving sometimes some "stops" on the % for around 5 seconds, and then continue to process the WU.

I'm trying the S5T0002 and it's perfect without the "strange stops" on the S5T0004.

Running on a P D 930 3.0ghz @ 4.2GHz.

Hope that can help you.

by the way... thanks for your efforts!!!!

Best regards,

Joined: 8 May 05
Posts: 116
Credit: 139,870
RAC: 0

Just did the patch for

Just did the patch for S5T0004, I exited BOINC with Einstein still sitting at 74%, did the patch, restarted, and its crunching so far. Will see how this one does. Thank you Akos. And thank you Crunch3r for the mirrored sites.


Joined: 4 Sep 05
Posts: 1,314
Credit: 1,752,700,836
RAC: 914,659

Is it just the UI update

Is it just the UI update pausing, or is work actaully stopping for a few secs? I've seen the former occasionally with all s4 variants.

Joined: 4 Jan 06
Posts: 79
Credit: 91,546
RAC: 0

Pentium4 2,66GHz, WinXPHome I

Pentium4 2,66GHz, WinXPHome
I used the patch
working now on a short h1 Wu
without patch duration 1h 51min
with patch ~1h 31min <-- 1% = 55 sec, means 81% of the normal execution time
difference 20 minutes
we will see, if it is done.
now 33% are done.
It works fine, thanks crunchr and akosf

Joined: 23 Mar 05
Posts: 219
Credit: 21,449,106
RAC: 0

RE: I used the

Message 38930 in response to message 38929


I used the patch

Which one?

Dead men don't get the baby washed. HTH

Joined: 24 Feb 05
Posts: 790
Credit: 3,487,124
RAC: 5,492

This is my first full result

This is my first full result with the S5T0003 patch. And this result was a hybrid - about 10% standard app/90% patched. It appears the patch is 10 to 12% faster than the standard app on my 2.4 GHz P4 w/Windows XP Pro.

Edit: This is my "Results for computer" (for comparison).

Manuel Palacios
Manuel Palacios
Joined: 18 Jan 05
Posts: 40
Credit: 224,259,334
RAC: 0

This is a hybrid result (~83%

This is a hybrid result (~83% std/17% S5T0004)... it took ~47457 seconds to complete OK, and claims 179.83 credits. Three comparable WUs (that were awarded the same amount of credit) crunched w/only std app took approx. 47787, 47644, and 47583, so I'd say this patch is faster.

Edit: The PC used for crunching the above WUs has a Pentium M 1600 cpu and is running WinXP Pro

Joined: 21 Mar 05
Posts: 139
Credit: 2,436,862
RAC: 0

First result with particular

First result with particular s5t0003 is finished with no problems on a A63 3500+ with WinXP. You can have a look here.

Crunchers For More Power
Crunchers For M...
Joined: 3 Aug 05
Posts: 69
Credit: 1,071,273
RAC: 0

Dualcore Opteron 170 @ 2,6

Dualcore Opteron 170 @ 2,6 GHz

Standard App: ca. 27500s (7h 38min)
patched S5T0004: ca. 26400s (7h 20min)

improvement: ca 4% (average of 2 WUs)

Joined: 25 Aug 05
Posts: 5
Credit: 1,333,584
RAC: 0

I am testing Patch 0003 on a

I am testing Patch 0003 on a P3 Coppermine.
The first WU with the patch needed more time than the original client (???).
(original app with 8684s),(patched app with 9422s).

I will leave this 0003 patch running over the weekend and compare further results.

Comment viewing options

Select your preferred way to display the comments and click "Save settings" to activate your changes.