Optomized S5 SSE3

_heinz
_heinz
Joined: 4 Jan 06
Posts: 79
Credit: 130476
RAC: 0

RE: Pentium4 2,66GHz,

Message 38936 in response to message 38929

Quote:

Pentium4 2,66GHz, WinXPHome
I used the patch
working now on a short h1 Wu
without patch duration 1h 51min
with patch ~1h 31min 5.3.12.tx37

2006-06-23 04:36:28.7656 [normal]: E@H S5R1 4.02 SSE-0004 TEST
2006-06-23 04:36:28.7656 [normal]: Started search at lalDebugLevel = 0
2006-06-23 04:36:29.4531 [normal]: Checkpoint-file 'Fstat.out.ckp' not found.
2006-06-23 04:36:29.4531 [normal]: No usable checkpoint found, starting from beginning.
Detected CPU type 1
2006-06-23 06:32:38.9218 [normal]: Search finished successfully.


Validate state Checked, but no consensus yet
Claimed credit 22.4068287037037
Granted credit 0
application version 4.02

with patch 115 min
these are 4 min more.
without patch 111 min
That means not every cycle of 1 min is equal long !!!
very interesting, but why ?

Crunch3r
Crunch3r
Joined: 22 Jan 05
Posts: 90
Credit: 30237616
RAC: 0

S5T0004 produces invalid

Message 38937 in response to message 38936
Akos Fekete
Akos Fekete
Joined: 13 Nov 05
Posts: 561
Credit: 4527270
RAC: 0

RE: S5T0004 produces

Message 38938 in response to message 38937

Thanks.

Probably the validator works with very low tolerances.

Ananas
Ananas
Joined: 22 Jan 05
Posts: 272
Credit: 2500681
RAC: 0

First valid results with

First valid results with S5T0002.dat on a 2xAthlon MP2600+

No invalid ones so far, the others are pending / not checked yet.

I didn't patch cumulative btw.

Svenie25
Svenie25
Joined: 21 Mar 05
Posts: 139
Credit: 2436862
RAC: 0

RE: S5T0004 produces

Message 38940 in response to message 38937

Quote:
S5T0004 produces invalid results.

Does it mean, we should stop using S5T0004?

Pepperammi
Pepperammi
Joined: 20 Feb 05
Posts: 131
Credit: 437943
RAC: 0

S5T0000 on P D 830

Message 38941 in response to message 38940

S5T0000 on P D 830 3.2Ghz
http://einsteinathome.org/task/34774177 - valid and credit granted.

Sorry i must have done something wrong first time and it didn't patch. Succefully patched now and finished first.Couple more in few hours

Svenie25
Svenie25
Joined: 21 Mar 05
Posts: 139
Credit: 2436862
RAC: 0

34712232 think would also be

34712232 think would also be invalid. Only used S5T0004 for the last part.

Fuzzy Duck
Fuzzy Duck
Joined: 3 Dec 05
Posts: 37
Credit: 936924
RAC: 0

RE: S5T0004 produces

Message 38943 in response to message 38937

I am getting the same problem with ST50004.

http://einsteinathome.org/task/34561017
Checked, but no consensus yet

This likely means that my result is invalid, since the other user is not using a patched client.

BTW, finding such problems is the purpose of this beta test!

Akos Fekete
Akos Fekete
Joined: 13 Nov 05
Posts: 561
Credit: 4527270
RAC: 0

So, can i assume

So, can i assume this?

S5T0000: valid
S5T0001: valid
S5T0002: valid
S5T0003: valid
S5T0004: invalid

Did anybody find invalid result with S5T0000...S5T0003 ?

Gary Roberts
Gary Roberts
Moderator
Joined: 9 Feb 05
Posts: 5842
Credit: 109403587982
RAC: 35511558

I'm getting several valid

I'm getting several valid results with S5T0003.dat patched app.

Looks like 0003 may be good.

Cheers,
Gary.

Comment viewing options

Select your preferred way to display the comments and click "Save settings" to activate your changes.