Lie-ins are most definitely winning :) but only up to the point they stop you having enough time to do everything you have to once vaguely perpendicular. Which I think *scowl* is how you know you're a grown up.
CODE SOLUTION:
ZmNt : the last letter of the alphabet followed by m N t (make NOT true) means you're right Mike. We can ignore Z
ZmRt : whilst remembering that when then followed by m R t (make REVERSE true) transfers attention to the first letter of the alphabet - which should be easy enough to find out from a dictionary I reckon.
ZmNt )
ZmRt )
ZmNt ) and because we now have a letter determined for this segment, these terms cancel one another out
ZmRt )
ZmNt )
ZmRt )
ZwNt until w : meaning: whoa => (ie - end cancelling; end first letter, thereby making => w N t (whoa NOT true) which means that the first letter is not a standalone one.
THEREFORE - via standard hiatical reasoning
ZmNt )
ZmRt ) we must cancel initial redundancies prior to a code line duplicated sequentially
ZmNt )
ZmRt )
ZmNt as this one is here
ZmNt with this one
ZmRt )
ZmNt ) then cancel a reversed redundancy (as here) to preserve the doubled uppercase metric in its lowercase form, giving us two n's
ZwNt ............... (see up there somewhere - but change first to second)
THEN - obviously, as we've just cancelled a reversed redundancy, we have to follow the laws governing cognitive semantic resonance patterning as prescribed by *stare straight ahead* a percussive triangle in its struck state. So!Looking at the next segment of Jonathan's code: ZmNt : ZmNt : ZmRt : ZmNt : ZmNt : ZmNt : ZmNt : ZmNt after stripping out some tactical buffering gives us the word llilllllly .... which might look problematic until we remember that it's only its vowels that will have any significance with regard the code... thereby giving us an... i.
The nebulousness of y in its role at the end of a word is generally discounted as a y at this stage and replaced with its phonetic equivalent, ie: e to give us the second letter in this segment - but you could leave doing that until the end unless you're likely to forget to
ZwNt ............... (like I said before up there plussing one)
This next segment I expect most everyone already knows the answer to, so I won't go into the proof in too much depth, other than to reiterate that in a 4-column code structure, like here, the last cypher in the fourth segment is the last letter in the first word.
ZmNt
ZmRt
ZmNt
ZmNt which is t
ZmRt
ZmRt
ZmNt
ZmNt <--- see?
ZwNt .................. again another whoa clause... but do feel free to murmur an impressed wow instead if you wish *wait expectantly*
ZmNt
ZmNt
ZmRt
ZmRt
ZmNt
ZmNt
ZmRt
ZmRt ... nn rr nn rr is the sequencing here and also in the following segment.
ZwNt ..................
ZmNt It really is the most fascinating part of the puzzle because of its reiteration of the reversed n's to become u's
ZmNt
ZmRt
ZmRt
ZmNt
ZmNt
ZmRt
ZmRt
ZwNt...................... thereby reinforcing the electrostigmatic field defining double u as uu and then as w which is the first letter of the second word! :)
ZmNt
ZmRt
ZmRt
ZmRt
ZmNt
ZmRt
ZmNt
ZmNt
ZwNt........................ Then (as amply demonstrated here) o can be the only solution to this segment. It's so round! And being mostly made of an empty space - all forms of reversal have the same end result.
ZmNt
ZmNt
ZmRt
ZmNt
ZmNt
ZmNt
ZmNt and with the surfeit of n's here ... n is the last letter.
ZmR
And there you have it! :) Solved!!
I have chronic constant megalomania, thnak you very much! It's far superior to the other types. The megalomaniac's megalomania as it were.
*lower light flaps... then release* Well thnak you for confirming that for us, Mike. I hope the above didn't overly disturb your equilibrium?
*Beam happily at Einsteinians everywhere* Hope you're all having a lovely weekend :)
Please wait here. Further instructions could pile up at any time. Thank you.
THEN - obviously, as we've just cancelled a reversed redundancy, we have to follow the laws governing cognitive semantic resonance patterning as prescribed by a percussive triangle in its struck state.
Well obviously, stands out a mile doesn't it??
BING!!!!
anniet won
But our little SA cherub didn't go quite the full mile. Actually that is an anagram of Newtonian, and that is applied to all sorts of cosmological things you see.
The second equation says that the kinetic energy (seen from the origin) of a particle of unit mass moving with the expansion plus its (negative) gravitational potential energy (relative to the mass contained in the sphere of matter closer to the origin) is equal to a constant related to the curvature of the universe.
Now that you are all suitably impressed and star struck, I'll toddle off for a well earned beer or three.
Waiting for Godot & salvation :-)
Why do doctors have to practice?
You'd think they'd have got it right by now
Me thinks I ought to clean my glasses. It might make Annie's solution make more sense. :0)
Oh. Erm... I wouldn't actually count on that, Kathryn. No.
;)
I did have something resembling Gary's method at one point *methodically scan floor for piece of paper* although I can't remember whether R was 1. Whichever way round it was. these: â £ ã ¢ £ @ @ ñ (jumbled so as not to set off any world wide panic) were not quite what I was expecting after the earlier string of abuse that came out of the converter table I was using.
No. So I filed it. The piece of paper I mean. It's just as well I did or I might never have broken the code! :)
Please wait here. Further instructions could pile up at any time. Thank you.
You guys have put way more effort into solving my riddle then I had expected.
With all the clues lying around it's now just a matter of waiting for someone to quote the message that will grant victory and make you the winner of this thread!
Or you eat in bed and only
Or you eat in bed and only get out for the bathroom break.
Lie-ins are most definitely
Lie-ins are most definitely winning :) but only up to the point they stop you having enough time to do everything you have to once vaguely perpendicular. Which I think *scowl* is how you know you're a grown up.
CODE SOLUTION:
ZmNt : the last letter of the alphabet followed by m N t (make NOT true) means you're right Mike. We can ignore Z
ZmRt : whilst remembering that when then followed by m R t (make REVERSE true) transfers attention to the first letter of the alphabet - which should be easy enough to find out from a dictionary I reckon.
ZmNt )
ZmRt )
ZmNt ) and because we now have a letter determined for this segment, these terms cancel one another out
ZmRt )
ZmNt )
ZmRt )
ZwNt until w : meaning: whoa => (ie - end cancelling; end first letter, thereby making => w N t (whoa NOT true) which means that the first letter is not a standalone one.
THEREFORE - via standard hiatical reasoning
ZmNt )
ZmRt ) we must cancel initial redundancies prior to a code line duplicated sequentially
ZmNt )
ZmRt )
ZmNt as this one is here
ZmNt with this one
ZmRt )
ZmNt ) then cancel a reversed redundancy (as here) to preserve the doubled uppercase metric in its lowercase form, giving us two n's
ZwNt ............... (see up there somewhere - but change first to second)
THEN - obviously, as we've just cancelled a reversed redundancy, we have to follow the laws governing cognitive semantic resonance patterning as prescribed by *stare straight ahead* a percussive triangle in its struck state. So!Looking at the next segment of Jonathan's code: ZmNt : ZmNt : ZmRt : ZmNt : ZmNt : ZmNt : ZmNt : ZmNt after stripping out some tactical buffering gives us the word llilllllly .... which might look problematic until we remember that it's only its vowels that will have any significance with regard the code... thereby giving us an... i.
The nebulousness of y in its role at the end of a word is generally discounted as a y at this stage and replaced with its phonetic equivalent, ie: e to give us the second letter in this segment - but you could leave doing that until the end unless you're likely to forget to
ZwNt ............... (like I said before up there plussing one)
This next segment I expect most everyone already knows the answer to, so I won't go into the proof in too much depth, other than to reiterate that in a 4-column code structure, like here, the last cypher in the fourth segment is the last letter in the first word.
ZmNt
ZmRt
ZmNt
ZmNt which is t
ZmRt
ZmRt
ZmNt
ZmNt <--- see?
ZwNt .................. again another whoa clause... but do feel free to murmur an impressed wow instead if you wish *wait expectantly*
ZmNt
ZmNt
ZmRt
ZmRt
ZmNt
ZmNt
ZmRt
ZmRt ... nn rr nn rr is the sequencing here and also in the following segment.
ZwNt ..................
ZmNt It really is the most fascinating part of the puzzle because of its reiteration of the reversed n's to become u's
ZmNt
ZmRt
ZmRt
ZmNt
ZmNt
ZmRt
ZmRt
ZwNt...................... thereby reinforcing the electrostigmatic field defining double u as uu and then as w which is the first letter of the second word! :)
ZmNt
ZmRt
ZmRt
ZmRt
ZmNt
ZmRt
ZmNt
ZmNt
ZwNt........................ Then (as amply demonstrated here) o can be the only solution to this segment. It's so round! And being mostly made of an empty space - all forms of reversal have the same end result.
ZmNt
ZmNt
ZmRt
ZmNt
ZmNt
ZmNt
ZmNt and with the surfeit of n's here ... n is the last letter.
ZmR
And there you have it! :) Solved!!
*lower light flaps... then release* Well thnak you for confirming that for us, Mike. I hope the above didn't overly disturb your equilibrium?
*Beam happily at Einsteinians everywhere* Hope you're all having a lovely weekend :)
Please wait here. Further instructions could pile up at any time. Thank you.
THEN - obviously, as we've
Well obviously, stands out a mile doesn't it??
BING!!!!
anniet won
But our little SA cherub didn't go quite the full mile. Actually that is an anagram of Newtonian, and that is applied to all sorts of cosmological things you see.
Now that you are all suitably impressed and star struck, I'll toddle off for a well earned beer or three.
Waiting for Godot & salvation :-)
Why do doctors have to practice?
You'd think they'd have got it right by now
Well obviously, stands out a
Almost to the point it went without saying, yes.
:)
I see you had a look in the dictionary, Chris...
edit: ... and then branched out adventurously! :)
Please wait here. Further instructions could pile up at any time. Thank you.
Well, us Chris S's are wont
Well, us Chris S's are wont to do that on occasions, they just need the right stimulus :-)))
Waiting for Godot & salvation :-)
Why do doctors have to practice?
You'd think they'd have got it right by now
ZmNtZmRtZmNtZmRtZmNtZmRtZmNtZ
ZmNtZmRtZmNtZmRtZmNtZmRtZmNtZmRtZwNt
ZmNtZmRtZmNtZmRtZmNtZmNtZmRtZmNtZwNt
ZmNtZmNtZmRtZmNtZmNtZmNtZmNtZmNtZwNt
ZmNtZmRtZmNtZmNtZmRtZmRtZmNtZmNtZwNt
ZmNtZmNtZmRtZmRtZmNtZmNtZmRtZmRtZwNt
ZmNtZmNtZmRtZmRtZmNtZmNtZmRtZmRtZwNt
ZmNtZmRtZmRtZmRtZmNtZmRtZmNtZmNtZwNt
ZmNtZmNtZmRtZmNtZmNtZmNtZmNtZmR
This is the problem one has with messages, one has to figure out the matrix before you can begin to decode.
As you see above the "w"'s align.
Going again, one notices the only other change is either an "R" or an "N"
Assigning 0 to R and 1 to N, or course that might be reverse
10101010 01010101 U
10101101 01010010 R
11011111 00100000 (space)
10110011 01001100 L
11001100 00110011 3
11001100 00110011 3
10001011 01110100 t
11011110 00100001 !
decide if ASCII or EBCDIC and read message
A Saturday morning win for
A Saturday morning win for me. I'm ready to get my second cuppa coffee.
Ugh. Me thinks I ought to clean my glasses. It might make Annie's solution make more sense. :0)
Kathryn :o)
Einstein@Home Moderator
Me thinks I ought to clean my
Oh. Erm... I wouldn't actually count on that, Kathryn. No.
;)
I did have something resembling Gary's method at one point *methodically scan floor for piece of paper* although I can't remember whether R was 1. Whichever way round it was. these: â £ ã ¢ £ @ @ ñ (jumbled so as not to set off any world wide panic) were not quite what I was expecting after the earlier string of abuse that came out of the converter table I was using.
No. So I filed it. The piece of paper I mean. It's just as well I did or I might never have broken the code! :)
Please wait here. Further instructions could pile up at any time. Thank you.
You guys have put way more
You guys have put way more effort into solving my riddle then I had expected.
With all the clues lying around it's now just a matter of waiting for someone to quote the message that will grant victory and make you the winner of this thread!
Jonathan_76 wrote:... it's
I don't know about anyone else, but I'm getting the feeling I haven't won yet...
unless I've tripped up, simply by not putting it into quotes...
Ohhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhh! Oh that's very good! I'll be back.
:)
Please wait here. Further instructions could pile up at any time. Thank you.