I've got the same problem, mega cpu error on BRP4G, changed my settings to not use those WU and now the machine that had the problem wont run 2x BRP6..
Anyway all my machine settings are now for NO BRP4G...
I have just noticed that for BRP6 there was never a Windows x64 version of CUDA55 application either. Did it have the same issue? Since the x86 v1.57 BRP4G was OK, why not release it for both x86 and x64 systems - similar as BRP6 ? I don't think there's any significant benefit in releasing a GPU app for x64.
I have just noticed that for BRP6 there was never a Windows x64 version of CUDA55 application either. Did it have the same issue? Since the x86 v1.57 BRP4G was OK, why not release it for both x86 and x64 systems - similar as BRP6 ? I don't think there's any significant benefit in releasing a GPU app for x64.
Based on developer comments for the apps over at SETI, you are likely correct there is no benefit to 64 bit apps for these science applications, in fact, actually causes more overhead and longer runtimes. Probably can release the BRP6 CUDA55 beta app for BRP4G. But really, after all these years, that app should already be the general release app and NOT Beta. It's been well proven to work very well so far.
If the online privacy statement is not available, please read our privacy statement offline:
C:\Windows\system32\en-US\erofflps.txt
----
The remaining 9 also crashed, but I didn't get the error messages as I was trying to save supper from the oven. I'm running four work units at a time on an MSI GTX 980 Ti Golden Edition that's at "stock" clocks (1341 core, 3505/7010 memory), nvidia driver 368.81, and Windows 7 Home Edition 64-Bit.
I am working on a GPU version of the Gamma-Ray pulsar search...
Does that mean that Einstein will be GPU only from then on? Or will there be a new Gravitational Wave search before? If not and without anything else left, it will also mean end of line for me.
BRP4G-cuda55 is running okay on my home machine but recently I have got this:
22.09.2016 14:24:13 | Einstein@Home | Task p2030.20151216.G176.58-00.81.S.b6s0g0.00000_1872_0 exited with zero status but no 'finished' file
22.09.2016 14:24:13 | Einstein@Home | If this happens repeatedly you may need to reset the project.
Does that mean that Einstein will be GPU only from then on? Or will there be a new Gravitational Wave search before? If not and without anything else left, it will also mean end of line for me.
Does anybody know what is the plan class for this BRP4G-cuda55 app? It is currently not showing in the applications page. I would like to get my app_config ready to handle it. I've got now 3 queued up waiting for execution.
[edit] Never mind I found it. It is BRP4G-cuda55. Obviously. [/edit]
Hi, I've got the same
)
Hi,
I've got the same problem, mega cpu error on BRP4G, changed my settings to not use those WU and now the machine that had the problem wont run 2x BRP6..
Anyway all my machine settings are now for NO BRP4G...
But if BRP6 is ending, whats left for GPU's?
Cliff
Cliff,
Been there, Done that, Still no damm T Shirt.
I have just noticed that for
)
I have just noticed that for BRP6 there was never a Windows x64 version of CUDA55 application either. Did it have the same issue?
Since the x86 v1.57 BRP4G was OK, why not release it for both x86 and x64 systems - similar as BRP6 ?
I don't think there's any significant benefit in releasing a GPU app for x64.
-----
Mumak wrote:I have just
)
Based on developer comments for the apps over at SETI, you are likely correct there is no benefit to 64 bit apps for these science applications, in fact, actually causes more overhead and longer runtimes. Probably can release the BRP6 CUDA55 beta app for BRP4G. But really, after all these years, that app should already be the general release app and NOT Beta. It's been well proven to work very well so far.
For those of us who still
)
For those of us who still have the BRP4G-cuda55 jobs (I have 13 of the 1.56) should we cancel/abandon the work units, or see how they play out?
EDIT (21 Sept, 16:54 MDT): First one errored after just a few seconds, and contends of the error message that popped up were as follows:
----
Problem signature:
Problem Event Name: APPCRASH
Application Name: einsteinbinary_BRP4G_1.56_windows_x86_64__BRP4G-cuda55.exe
Application Version: 0.0.0.0
Application Timestamp: 559beebb
Fault Module Name: einsteinbinary_BRP4G_1.56_windows_x86_64__BRP4G-cuda55.exe
Fault Module Version: 0.0.0.0
Fault Module Timestamp: 559beebb
Exception Code: c0000005
Exception Offset: 0000000000384548
OS Version: 6.1.7601.2.1.0.768.3
Locale ID: 1033
Additional Information 1: 0c42
Additional Information 2: 0c429a2f0f7486c392aa8ebcbaa01e47
Additional Information 3: d4b0
Additional Information 4: d4b0576d2029e957699ec1e4872682e2
Read our privacy statement online:
http://go.microsoft.com/fwlink/?linkid=104288&clcid=0x0409
If the online privacy statement is not available, please read our privacy statement offline:
C:\Windows\system32\en-US\erofflps.txt
----
Second one crashed and gave the following:
----
Problem signature:
Problem Event Name: APPCRASH
Application Name: einsteinbinary_BRP4G_1.56_windows_x86_64__BRP4G-cuda55.exe
Application Version: 0.0.0.0
Application Timestamp: 559beebb
Fault Module Name: einsteinbinary_BRP4G_1.56_windows_x86_64__BRP4G-cuda55.exe
Fault Module Version: 0.0.0.0
Fault Module Timestamp: 559beebb
Exception Code: c0000005
Exception Offset: 0000000000384548
OS Version: 6.1.7601.2.1.0.768.3
Locale ID: 1033
Additional Information 1: 0c42
Additional Information 2: 0c429a2f0f7486c392aa8ebcbaa01e47
Additional Information 3: d4b0
Additional Information 4: d4b0576d2029e957699ec1e4872682e2
Read our privacy statement online:
http://go.microsoft.com/fwlink/?linkid=104288&clcid=0x0409
If the online privacy statement is not available, please read our privacy statement offline:
C:\Windows\system32\en-US\erofflps.txt
Bernd Machenschalk wrote:I am
)
Does that mean that Einstein will be GPU only from then on? Or will there be a new Gravitational Wave search before? If not and without anything else left, it will also mean end of line for me.
BRP4G-cuda55 is running okay
)
BRP4G-cuda55 is running okay on my home machine but recently I have got this:
So the app started from scratch.
Maybe this will help in analysis.
Jasper_7 wrote:Does that mean
)
I replied in the Plans for near future of E@H thread, as this is probably of general interest.
BM
Further details on
)
Further details on BRP4G-cuda55 v1.56:
Probably this app doesn't save checkpoints because every time it resumes computation from scratch.
Does anybody know what is the
)
Does anybody know what is the plan class for this BRP4G-cuda55 app? It is currently not showing in the applications page. I would like to get my app_config ready to handle it. I've got now 3 queued up waiting for execution.
[edit] Never mind I found it. It is BRP4G-cuda55. Obviously.
[/edit]
Finally the BRP4G-cuda55
)
Finally the BRP4G-cuda55 v1.56 app finished with an error.
Here's copy of the log:
It took more than 12 hours to complete (with an error - what a waste of GPU time) while cuda 32 version usually takes 1h40m to complete.