CUDA and openCL Benchmarks
6 Jun 2012 19:37:29 UTC
Topic 196380
(moderation:
Quote:
@Ageless
What OpenCL uses is Compute Units and OpenCL Processing Elements.
See Geeks3D for a complete write-up and while you're there, get CAPS GPU Viewer. That'll show you the 'power' of your GPU.
This did lead me to another interesting link people here might find interesting: an openCL-benchmark database that compares the compute performance between all the different hardware including AMD CPUs and the new Intel cores that support openCL. It gives a lot of detailed information when you open the links for each piece of hardware.
Running the benchmark I didn't quite hit their listed results but I came close.
I wonder if there is a way to compare E@H crunch times with the expected results from the benchmarks...but the Nvidia crunchers are still using CUDA aren't they?
I run Arecibo 1.24 in roughly 3800secs on my 6850, am wondering how other people compare.
CUDA and openCL Benchmarks
)
680= 3 tasks running @ 3100 roughly
RE: 680= 3 tasks running @
)
Yeah that seems about right, roughly 3.5x my 6850.
Anybody got a GTX 460 or 550Ti? I'd like to fill out this list of GPUs...I just really like numbers/stats; they make me all warm and fuzzy inside. :)
...and I don't have access to the E@H database...:(
HD 7970
HD 7950
GTX 690 (2 GPU)
GTX 590 (2 GPU)
HD 7870
GTX 680 ------> 3 x 3100sec
GTX 580
GTX 570
HD 7850
GTX 670
GTX 690 (1 GPU)
GTX 570
GTX 480
GTX 470
GTS 450
GTX 590 (1 GPU)
HD 7770
GTX 560 Ti
GT 440
GTX 460
HD 7750
GTX 560
GTX 465
HD 5850
HD 5870
HD 6970
HD 6950
HD 6990 (1 GPU)
HD 6870
GTX 460 SE
HD 5970 (1 GPU)
HD 6850 ------> 3800sec
GTX 550 Ti
GTS 450
HD 6790
HD 5770
HD 6770
HD 5570
GTX 560 Ti [448] x2 tasks
)
GTX 560 Ti [448]
x2 tasks -- 2,500 sec. +/-
x1 task --- 1,550 sec. +/-
GTX 550 Ti 1 task ~3600 sec
)
GTX 550 Ti
1 task ~3600 sec
RE: GTX 560 Ti [448] x2
)
GTX560Ti
x6 tasks -- 7800 secs
RE: GTX 550 Ti 1 task ~3600
)
Hmm, a little faster than my 6850 even with my OCed i5 2500K (@4.5GHz)...
That is quite the jump between a 550 Ti and 560 [448].
@Sid
x6 tasks is a lot...would you be able to post times for 1,2 & 3 tasks? I know it might cut you down on crunching for a day but I'd like to see the comparison times; my 6850 can run 2 tasks but the run time gets evenly split between the two (result of 6,500secs for both) with no real gain.
I read on these forums that even the 7970 gets choked by PCIe bandwidth limits running over 3 tasks...
Damn...can't edit older posts...have to re-post table... :(
HD 7970
HD 7950
GTX 690 (2 GPU)
GTX 590 (2 GPU)
HD 7870
GTX 680 ------> 3 x 3,100sec
GTX 580
GTX 570
HD 7850
GTX 670
GTX 690 (1 GPU)
GTX 570
GTX 480
GTX 470
GTS 450
GTX 590 (1 GPU)
HD 7770
GTX 560 [448] --> 1x 1,550, 2x 2,500
GTX 560 Ti ----> 6x 7,800
GT 440
GTX 460
HD 7750
GTX 560
GTX 465
HD 5850
HD 5870
HD 6970
HD 6950
HD 6990 (1 GPU)
HD 6870
GTX 460 SE
HD 5970 (1 GPU)
HD 6850 ------> 3,800sec
GTX 550 Ti ---> 3,600sec
GTS 450
HD 6790
HD 5770
HD 6770
HD 5570
Anybody out there got a 7850?
)
Anybody out there got a 7850? I plan to get one later this summer when the funds are available; would like to get a preview of what it'll do here.
Vit in the ATI GPU thread
)
Vit in the ATI GPU thread posted 7970 2@2300
It might be worth noting that
)
It might be worth noting that the times for the GTX 560 Ti [448]
were with 1 CPU thread free and 7 CPU WCG jobs running at the same time. (i7 & Linux x64)
Probably would improve times without the CPU jobs running.
RE: RE: GTX 550 Ti 1 task
)
Pleae look at the discussion on :
http://einsteinathome.org/node/195666&nowrap=true#110720