CUDA and openCL Benchmarks

Pooh Bear 27
Pooh Bear 27
Joined: 20 Mar 05
Posts: 1,376
Credit: 20,312,671
RAC: 0

To add to your list: My

To add to your list:
My HD5670 does them in just under 11100 seconds (This card isn't listed on your list)
My HD5770 does them in just over 7750 seconds

Petrion
Petrion
Joined: 30 Apr 08
Posts: 53
Credit: 1,243,186
RAC: 0

RE: Pleae look at the

Quote:

Pleae look at the discussion on :
http://einsteinathome.org/node/195666&nowrap=true#110720

Ah thanks, Sid. Good catch.

Petrion
Petrion
Joined: 30 Apr 08
Posts: 53
Credit: 1,243,186
RAC: 0

RE: To add to your list: My

Quote:
To add to your list:
My HD5670 does them in just under 11100 seconds (This card isn't listed on your list)
My HD5770 does them in just over 7750 seconds

Yeah, tried to keep list relatively short...didn't think anybody would have a 5670. :)

Thanks for the info.

Petrion
Petrion
Joined: 30 Apr 08
Posts: 53
Credit: 1,243,186
RAC: 0

RE: ... my 6850 can run 2

Quote:
... my 6850 can run 2 tasks but the run time gets evenly split between the two (result of 6,500secs for both) with no real gain.


Oops, forgot to carry the 1...should be 2x tasks @7,500secs.

Petrion
Petrion
Joined: 30 Apr 08
Posts: 53
Credit: 1,243,186
RAC: 0

RE: Vit in the ATI GPU

Quote:
Vit in the ATI GPU thread posted 7970 2@2300


Thanks 5pot, I posted in that thread myself but forgot about the part of the discussion...that threads getting a little long.

Petrion
Petrion
Joined: 30 Apr 08
Posts: 53
Credit: 1,243,186
RAC: 0

Updated table...with HD 5670

Updated table...with HD 5670 added.

HD 7970 ------> 2 x 2,300sec
HD 7950
GTX 690 (2 GPU)
GTX 590 (2 GPU)
HD 7870
GTX 680 ------> 3 x 3,100sec
GTX 580
GTX 570
HD 7850
GTX 670
GTX 690 (1 GPU)
GTX 570
GTX 480
GTX 470
GTS 450
GTX 590 (1 GPU)
HD 7770
GTX 560 [448] -> 1x 1,550, 2x 2,500
GTX 560 Ti ----> 1x~2,460, 2x~3,249, 3x~4,920, 4x~6,000, 5x~6840, 6x 7,800
GT 440
GTX 460
HD 7750
GTX 560
GTX 465
HD 5850
HD 5870
HD 6970
HD 6950
HD 6990 (1 GPU)
HD 6870
GTX 460 SE
HD 5970 (1 GPU)
HD 6850 ------> 3,800sec
GTX 550 Ti ---> 3,600sec
GTS 450
HD 6790
HD 5770 ------> 7,750+secs
HD 6770
HD 5670 ------> 11,100secs
HD 5570

Petrion
Petrion
Joined: 30 Apr 08
Posts: 53
Credit: 1,243,186
RAC: 0

Double-posted for some

Double-posted for some reason....

Jeearr
Jeearr
Joined: 23 Feb 06
Posts: 14
Credit: 107,155,091
RAC: 0

AMD HD7750 -- 2x tasks

AMD HD7750 -- 2x tasks ~11,000 secs
AMD HD7770 -- 2x tasks ~10,000 secs

ran these on an AlthonII X2 235e (2.7 GHz). Currently running the 7770.
Will also test on a i3 2100T. I will also see what a HD 5570 can do. I think I have a HD 5450 sitting in the video card grave yard I can try as well.

Cheers!

Jeroen
Jeroen
Joined: 25 Nov 05
Posts: 379
Credit: 740,030,628
RAC: 0

680 - 2 x 1945 (Linux) 580 -

680 - 2 x 1945 (Linux)
580 - 3 x 3350 (Windows)
580 - 3 x 3050 (Linux)
295 - 1 x 2000 per GPU (Linux)
8800GT G92 - 1 x 3600 (Linux)
8800GTS G80 - 1 x 4020 (Linux)

I am going off memory on a couple of these but the numbers should be close to right. CUDA in Linux tends to be faster than CUDA in Windows with BRP4 especially if Linux is setup shell only without X11.

Sid
Sid
Joined: 17 Oct 10
Posts: 164
Credit: 952,612,456
RAC: 138,450

RE: AMD HD7750 -- 2x tasks

Quote:

AMD HD7750 -- 2x tasks ~11,000 secs
AMD HD7770 -- 2x tasks ~10,000 secs

ran these on an AlthonII X2 235e (2.7 GHz). Currently running the 7770.
Will also test on a i3 2100T. I will also see what a HD 5570 can do. I think I have a HD 5450 sitting in the video card grave yard I can try as well.

Cheers!

Talking about relatively old card
GT220 - 2x - 19,400 secs

Comment viewing options

Select your preferred way to display the comments and click "Save settings" to activate your changes.