Einstein (or other project) on Intel Atom CPU
27 Feb 2009 20:45:56 UTC
Topic 194209
(moderation:
Hi,
does this makes sense? Can somebody post some run times, if available?
Michael
Einstein (or other project) on Intel Atom CPU
)
Sure, this one with these times is mine. I call it Handbag 'cos it's about that big - it's an 'Eee PC' by ASUS.
Cheers, Mike.
I have made this letter longer than usual because I lack the time to make it shorter ...
... and my other CPU is a Ryzen 5950X :-) Blaise Pascal
here's mine running fatter
)
here's mine running fatter WUs than Mike's is.
http://einsteinathome.org/host/1621782/tasks
No offence intended,
)
No offence intended, DanNeely, but please don’t tell me that after 4.5 years of crunching and 700 plus posts, you haven’t learned how to create links.
Your Link
Truly, no offence was intended, but posting a url is just silly and wasteful of everyone else's time. :o)
Your prototypical Generation 'Y' slacker, and damn proud of it.
Help feed the world's hungry. Free Rice.
RE: RE: Hi, does this
)
That's 27h runtime, approx 3x the runtime of an AMD X2 2GHz. I really thought they would perform better.
Problem is that the Acer One of mine will be off most of the time... Maybe I try some other shorter projects, and post runtimes.
Is the Eee PC of yours connected to other projects? Can you post links?
Michael
Team Linux Users Everywhere
RE: Is the Eee PC of yours
)
I only crunch E@H :-)
Cheers, Mike
I have made this letter longer than usual because I lack the time to make it shorter ...
... and my other CPU is a Ryzen 5950X :-) Blaise Pascal
Hi. OK, I attached it to
)
Hi.
OK, I attached it to Enigma at home (link).
Lets see how it fares.
As a pleasant surprise, I noticed that the Atom comes with hyper-threading.
Michael
Team Linux Users Everywhere
RE: No offence intended,
)
More like I never remember that is is the one forum I visit so out of date it doesn't automatically parse the URL for me.
RE: RE: No offence
)
I am sorry about that. I was in a bitchy mood yesterday. Shouldn't have taken it out on you, tho. Sorry.
And I agree, BOINC forums could do with a little updating. :o)
Your prototypical Generation 'Y' slacker, and damn proud of it.
Help feed the world's hungry. Free Rice.
Intel(R) Atom(TM) CPU N270
)
Intel(R) Atom(TM) CPU N270 @ 1.60GHz
2009-1-4 20:43:08||Starting BOINC client version 6.4.5 for windows_intelx86
2009-1-4 20:43:08||log flags: task, file_xfer, sched_ops
2009-1-4 20:43:08||Libraries: libcurl/7.19.0 OpenSSL/0.9.8i zlib/1.2.3
2009-1-4 20:43:08||Data directory: D:\Program Files\BOINC\My Data
2009-1-4 20:43:08||Running under account Administrator
2009-1-4 20:43:08|Einstein@Home|Found app_info.xml; using anonymous platform
2009-1-4 20:43:08||Processor: 2 GenuineIntel Intel(R) Atom(TM) CPU N270 @ 1.60GHz [x86 Family 6 Model 28 Stepping 2]
2009-1-4 20:43:08||Processor features: fpu tsc sse sse2 mmx
2009-1-4 20:43:08||OS: Microsoft Windows XP: Professional x86 Editon, Service Pack 3, (05.01.2600.00)
2009-1-4 20:43:08||Memory: 1015.29 MB physical, 2.90 GB virtual
2009-1-4 20:43:08||Disk: 37.11 GB total, 25.96 GB free
2009-1-4 20:43:08||Local time is UTC +8 hours
2009-1-4 20:43:08||Not using a proxy
2009-1-4 20:43:08||No CUDA devices found
2009-1-4 20:43:08||No coprocessors
2009-1-4 20:43:09|Einstein@Home|URL: http://einstein.phys.uwm.edu/; Computer ID: 1771340; location: (none); project prefs: default
2009-1-4 20:43:09||General prefs: from Einstein@Home (last modified 09-Mar-2006 19:22:04)
2009-1-4 20:43:09||Host location: none
2009-1-4 20:43:09||General prefs: using your defaults
2009-1-4 20:43:09||Reading preferences override file
2009-1-4 20:43:09||Preferences limit memory usage when active to 507.65MB
2009-1-4 20:43:09||Preferences limit memory usage when idle to 913.76MB
2009-1-4 20:43:09||Preferences limit disk usage to 0.30GB
2009-1-4 20:43:11|Einstein@Home|Restarting task h1_0753.30_S5R4__473_S5R4a_1 using einstein_S5R4 version 604
2009-1-4 20:43:12|Einstein@Home|Restarting task h1_0753.30_S5R4__472_S5R4a_0 using einstein_S5R4 version 604
2009-1-4 20:43:18||Running CPU benchmarks
2009-1-4 20:43:18||Suspending computation - running CPU benchmarks
2009-1-4 20:43:49||Benchmark results:
2009-1-4 20:43:49|| Number of CPUs: 2
2009-1-4 20:43:49|| 688 floating point MIPS (Whetstone) per CPU
2009-1-4 20:43:49|| 1768 integer MIPS (Dhrystone) per CPU
2009-1-4 20:43:51||Resuming computation
CPU type GenuineIntel
x86 Family 6 Model 8 Stepping 10 1011MHz (PIII 1 G)
Number of CPUs 2
Operating System Microsoft Windows XP
Professional Edition, Service Pack 2, (05.01.2600.00)
Memory 511.48 MB
Cache 976.56 KB
Swap space 1248.37 MB
Total disk space 32.73 GB
Free Disk Space 3.79 GB
Measured floating point speed 1028.55 million ops/sec
Measured integer speed 2620.8 million ops/sec
PIII 1G looks stronger than Atom
RE: PIII 1G looks stronger
)
Note that the Atom is hyperthreaded and the benchmark results are "per CPU". Now I don't give anything for those BOINC benchmarks, but they alone do not indicate that the Atom is inferior to the PIII@1GB. Would be interesting to compare the actual runtimes of WUs, I would not be surprised if the Atom indeed is less productive.
Bikeman