Note that the Atom is hyperthreaded and the benchmark results are "per CPU". Now I don't give anything for those BOINC benchmarks, but they alone do not indicate that the Atom is inferior to the PIII@1GB. Would be interesting to compare the actual runtimes of WUs, I would not be surprised if the Atom indeed is less productive.
This one is taking about 27 hours to crunch one unit.
Have you guys tried crunching just one unit at a time? I know it is an HT machine but sometimes the HT causes 'issues' and can actually take longer than one at a time. I am guessing to make it work out you would have to crunch one unit in around 13 hours or so, because it looks like you are doing 2 in about 27 hours now. My wife wants to buy one with out tax return, yes I get lots of money back each year. I know I could fix it but I like the 'stimulus check' each year. Kind of like a forced savings account, with no interest.
No, I have not tried it with just one task. This is a dual core machine with HT, so that would leave 3 threads idle. I'm thinking 505 credits/day is very good considering the power consumed.
I'm thinking 505 credits/day is very good considering the power consumed.
What is the power consumption of the whole system after all? Would be coo to have the exact figures in the "maximize credits per kWh" thread in this forum to compare it to Core 2 class desktops.
RE: RE: PIII 1G looks
)
you mean like this ? http://einsteinathome.org/host/1825175 had to shut it off due to heat issues, but theres still some results listed..
seeing without seeing is something the blind learn to do, and seeing beyond vision can be a gift.
I've returned 4 tasks so far
)
I've returned 4 tasks so far with my 330. It looks like it about 21 credits per hour, or about 505 per day.
http://einsteinathome.org/host/1865897/tasks
Reno, NV
Team: SETI.USA
RE: I've returned 4 tasks
)
Here's a Dell Inspiron Mini 9 for comparison.
RE: RE: I've returned 4
)
It is taking somewhere around 30 hours per unit though!
RE: I've returned 4 tasks
)
This one is taking about 27 hours to crunch one unit.
Have you guys tried crunching just one unit at a time? I know it is an HT machine but sometimes the HT causes 'issues' and can actually take longer than one at a time. I am guessing to make it work out you would have to crunch one unit in around 13 hours or so, because it looks like you are doing 2 in about 27 hours now. My wife wants to buy one with out tax return, yes I get lots of money back each year. I know I could fix it but I like the 'stimulus check' each year. Kind of like a forced savings account, with no interest.
No, I have not tried it with
)
No, I have not tried it with just one task. This is a dual core machine with HT, so that would leave 3 threads idle. I'm thinking 505 credits/day is very good considering the power consumed.
Reno, NV
Team: SETI.USA
RE: I'm thinking 505
)
What is the power consumption of the whole system after all? Would be coo to have the exact figures in the "maximize credits per kWh" thread in this forum to compare it to Core 2 class desktops.
CU
Bikeman
I don't have a kill-o-watt,
)
I don't have a kill-o-watt, or whatever it's called.
Reno, NV
Team: SETI.USA
SOmeone did test HT shortly
)
SOmeone did test HT shortly after atoms came out. Runing 2x einstien instead of only one get an IIRC 50%ish increase in throughput.
RE: SOmeone did test HT
)
Okay but I think that still means running HT is better overall. One cpu + 50% does not equal one cpu + one cpu, that would be one cpu + 100%. Right?