Windows S5R4 App 6.07 available for Beta Test

Byron S Goodgame
Byron S Goodgame
Joined: 16 Jan 06
Posts: 187
Credit: 56581
RAC: 0

Finished the ME 6.08 task all

Finished the ME 6.08 task all seems to have gone well.

Huff
Huff
Joined: 5 Jan 06
Posts: 36
Credit: 1378476
RAC: 0

For this machine

For this machine http://einsteinathome.org/host/1618644 , 6.07 runs on par with 6.04. With ver 6.05 I noticed about a 20% average improvement in the time taken to complete a task. not so with 6.07.
For instance the time with 6.05 was in the low to mid 30k seconds and with 6.07 it is back up to the mid 40k seconds. I expected it to remain about the same. Any idea what happend??

Novasen169
Novasen169
Joined: 14 May 06
Posts: 43
Credit: 2767204
RAC: 0

RE: For this machine

Message 88812 in response to message 88811

Quote:
For this machine http://einsteinathome.org/host/1618644 , 6.07 runs on par with 6.04. With ver 6.05 I noticed about a 20% average improvement in the time taken to complete a task. not so with 6.07.
For instance the time with 6.05 was in the low to mid 30k seconds and with 6.07 it is back up to the mid 40k seconds. I expected it to remain about the same. Any idea what happend??


Are you sure it's 6.07 and not 6.08?
6.08 is supposed to be as fast as 6.04 since it was only intended to fix a bug.
6.07 however should be as fast as 6.05...

Byron S Goodgame
Byron S Goodgame
Joined: 16 Jan 06
Posts: 187
Credit: 56581
RAC: 0

RE: Are you sure it's 6.07

Message 88813 in response to message 88812

Quote:
Are you sure it's 6.07 and not 6.08?
6.08 is supposed to be as fast as 6.04 since it was only intended to fix a bug.
6.07 however should be as fast as 6.05...

Looks to me, from what I checked, he's been using 6.07 for his latest tasks. I don't see any tasks he's done with 6.08. They also look to be in line with some of the latest 6.05 that he's done. He did have some finish faster on 6.05 but also had some take longer. Pretty much the way the tasks are in general, some just take longer than others, even using the same app.

Also the 6.08 app that's being used AFAIK isn't as fast as the 6.04, since it doesn't have even SSE instructions, as Richard pointed out in this message, unless there's a different release out that I'm not aware of.

Edit: Also I'm about 37% into another 6.04 and I'm wondering if another 6.08 test is needed on the ME OS?

Arion
Arion
Joined: 20 Mar 05
Posts: 147
Credit: 1626747
RAC: 0

I'm kind of confused to what

I'm kind of confused to what release of the Windows Power app we're (I) should be working with. I've run 6.05 and using 6.07 now with I think the SSE 2 routines. Should I go up to 6.08 or is it only for Win ME?

Thanks

Byron S Goodgame
Byron S Goodgame
Joined: 16 Jan 06
Posts: 187
Credit: 56581
RAC: 0

RE: I'm kind of confused to

Message 88815 in response to message 88814

Quote:

I'm kind of confused to what release of the Windows Power app we're (I) should be working with. I've run 6.05 and using 6.07 now with I think the SSE 2 routines. Should I go up to 6.08 or is it only for Win ME?

Thanks

6.08 is a test build. If you feel like being part of the testing then you should install it. It does work on other Windows OS's. It's not going to crunch the task faster though, actually it will do them slower than stock, but speed wasn't what it was trying to accomplish (see previous message). It was working on compatibility, to allow OS's like 98/ME to be included in the final release.

6.07 is a test build but seems to work well with compatible systems/ OS's and appears to be at least as fast as the 6.05

6.05 is the current released version for compatible systems and OS's.

Edit as mentioned by Gruß, Gundolf 6.04 is the stock applicaton

Gundolf Jahn
Gundolf Jahn
Joined: 1 Mar 05
Posts: 1079
Credit: 341280
RAC: 0

RE: ... 6.05 is the current

Message 88816 in response to message 88815

Quote:
...
6.05 is the current released version for compatible systems and OS's.


Really? Since I have an app_info.xml in place for 6.05. I thought 6.04 to be the stock application.

Gruß,
Gundolf

Computer sind nicht alles im Leben. (Kleiner Scherz)

Byron S Goodgame
Byron S Goodgame
Joined: 16 Jan 06
Posts: 187
Credit: 56581
RAC: 0

RE: RE: ... 6.05 is the

Message 88817 in response to message 88816

Quote:
Quote:
...
6.05 is the current released version for compatible systems and OS's.

Really? Since I have an app_info.xml in place for 6.05. I thought 6.04 to be the stock application.

Gruß,
Gundolf


Sorry, should have said current released opti app, and opti app for all the versions I mentioned for that matter.

Thanks for pointing that out.

Bernd Machenschalk
Bernd Machenschalk
Moderator
Administrator
Joined: 15 Oct 04
Posts: 4330
Credit: 251394547
RAC: 36019

Hopefully publishing the new

Hopefully publishing the new full-featured release candidate 6.09 with the 6.08 checkpointing code doesn't add to the confusion...

BM

BM

Richard Haselgrove
Richard Haselgrove
Joined: 10 Dec 05
Posts: 2143
Credit: 2975254556
RAC: 791829

The places to look for these

The places to look for these various application versions are:

* Applications page for the current stock applications (note 1)
* Power User Applications (2)
* Beta test applications (3)

(1) These are the applications that will get sent out automatically to the vast majority of users - present company excepted, of course. To describe the current app as v6.04 is a Windows-centric point of view (something I'm also frequently guilty of). Einstein usually uses the version number mechanism to distinguish between platforms.

(2) Power user apps are usually stable/tested/optimised, but only suitable for a limited class of CPUs. Just at the moment this is showing the v6.08 app, which I would have thought was better classed as a Beta test for W98/ME: it doesn't have any 'power' features for SSE or SSE2 processors.

(3) I hope everyone here knows what a Beta test is - may be good or may be terrible, use at your own risk, feedback requested. A new full-feature v6.09 package has appeared this morning. [and been announced while I was composing. Thanks, Bernd!]

[And if BM is watching - it seems slightly inconsistent that (1) and (3) are linked from the front page, but (2) isn't. RFC?)

Comment viewing options

Select your preferred way to display the comments and click "Save settings" to activate your changes.