64-bit in Einstein crunching

Stranger7777
Stranger7777
Joined: 17 Mar 05
Posts: 436
Credit: 431472300
RAC: 67152

I've heard somewhere here,

I've heard somewhere here, that Bernd ordered an VS2008 and it will soon be in his hands. Maybe then we will see the new x64 version, will we, Bernd?

PovAddict
PovAddict
Joined: 31 Mar 05
Posts: 45
Credit: 2508915
RAC: 0

RE: I've heard somewhere

Message 76636 in response to message 76635

Quote:
I've heard somewhere here, that Bernd ordered an VS2008 and it will soon be in his hands. Maybe then we will see the new x64 version, will we, Bernd?


He posted in another thread that he couldn't even get BOINC libraries to compile with VS2008.

Crunch3r
Crunch3r
Joined: 22 Jan 05
Posts: 90
Credit: 30237616
RAC: 0

RE: RE: I've heard

Message 76637 in response to message 76636

Quote:
Quote:
I've heard somewhere here, that Bernd ordered an VS2008 and it will soon be in his hands. Maybe then we will see the new x64 version, will we, Bernd?

He posted in another thread that he couldn't even get BOINC libraries to compile with VS2008.

Boinc compiles fine using vs 2008. I already did that. The real problem is that on windows, einstein uses cygwin environment instead of using native vs 200X environment...

regarding the 64 bit stuff... well the whole "hot loop" stuff would not work since vs 2005 inline asm stuff doesn't work and that's what's beeing used here. So in order to get a 64 bit app working you need to get rid of that asm stuff in the code and that means geting rid of cygwin and setting it up properly in a vs environment...

However that won't happen ( as far as i know) since compiling the lalsupport libs wich is the most important part in the code won't work...

The einstein@Home app is pretty simple... using most of the functions from the lalsupport lib and GSL .... however the lal lib is able to use intels MKL ffts instead of fftw3 for that purpose...

However, setting up a proper build environment for vs 200X without that cywin crap and removing inline assembly like the so called hot loop (EAH_OPTIMIZATION etc ...) would help a lot... however that's not going to happen...

btw, a 64 bit app won't be any faster at all...

BTW, EINSTEIN@HOME is open source .... --->
http://www.lsc-group.phys.uwm.edu/cgi-bin/cvs/viewcvs.cgi/einsteinathome/HierarchicalSearch/windows_build/?cvsroot=lscsoft&only_with_tag=HEAD#dirlist

You can have a look at the source for yourself....

DanNeely
DanNeely
Joined: 4 Sep 05
Posts: 1364
Credit: 3562358667
RAC: 0

RE: BTW, EINSTEIN@HOME is

Message 76638 in response to message 76637

Quote:


BTW, EINSTEIN@HOME is open source .... --->
http://www.lsc-group.phys.uwm.edu/cgi-bin/cvs/viewcvs.cgi/einsteinathome/HierarchicalSearch/windows_build/?cvsroot=lscsoft&only_with_tag=HEAD#dirlist

You can have a look at the source for yourself....

Does this represent a policy change (in the past Bruce and Bernd have said it was closed) or'd someone fubar their server configuration leaving it accidentally exposed.

jamesdavis
jamesdavis
Joined: 9 Feb 05
Posts: 14
Credit: 822778
RAC: 0

My experience is just the

Message 76639 in response to message 76638

My experience is just the opposite as apparently is expected here. An Einstein work unit on my 64 bit system running Windows 2008 64 bit OS takes upwards of 186,000 cpu seconds while an einstein work unit on my dual processor Windows 2000 server system takes a bit over 85,000 cpu seconds to run. The quad has 5 gig of ram, the dual processor has only 1 gig.

Klimax
Klimax
Joined: 27 Apr 07
Posts: 87
Credit: 1370205
RAC: 0

RE: RE: BTW,

Message 76640 in response to message 76638

Quote:
Quote:


BTW, EINSTEIN@HOME is open source .... --->
http://www.lsc-group.phys.uwm.edu/cgi-bin/cvs/viewcvs.cgi/einsteinathome/HierarchicalSearch/windows_build/?cvsroot=lscsoft&only_with_tag=HEAD#dirlist

You can have a look at the source for yourself....

Does this represent a policy change (in the past Bruce and Bernd have said it was closed) or'd someone fubar their server configuration leaving it accidentally exposed.

I do not think it is accidental.Entire CVS is linked on front page.The only thing missing is address for CVS app.

Comment viewing options

Select your preferred way to display the comments and click "Save settings" to activate your changes.