will i ever get credit for this workunit
9 Jul 2007 18:51:57 UTC
Topic 192951
(moderation:
Result ID
click for details Computer Sent Time reported
or deadline
explain Server state
explain Outcome
explain Client state
explain CPU time (sec) claimed credit granted credit
85044341 627016 12 Jun 2007 12:11:31 UTC 12 Jun 2007 12:14:06 UTC Over Client error Compute error 87.95 0.28 ---
85044342 849574 12 Jun 2007 17:40:43 UTC 20 Jun 2007 15:10:35 UTC Over Client error Aborted 303.03 0.53 ---
85044405 765129 12 Jun 2007 21:53:09 UTC 15 Jun 2007 17:51:57 UTC Over Success Done 91,835.70 347.98 pending
85214727 507054 21 Jun 2007 20:50:50 UTC 5 Jul 2007 20:50:50 UTC Over No reply New 0.00 --- ---
85538101 928482 5 Jul 2007 21:02:57 UTC 19 Jul 2007 21:02:57 UTC In Progress Unknown New --- --- ---
It does not look like this unit will ever complete. out of five attempts, i think mine is the only one to complete successfully. This is not one of the really large units.
will i ever get credit for this workunit
)
Don't worry...
Here is a better one: WU:33996370
RE: Don't worry... Here is
)
You're right, I won't complain about them anymore, I wondered if there were worse ones.
Probably part of the problem
)
Probably part of the problem is they were keyed to the old app when the work was generated. Some hosts have more trouble with the old app than others, even on Windows.
Alinator
Hi! This one is
)
Hi!
This one is exceptional as well, note that the very first host succeeded (more than a month ago), and all hosts afterwards failed or were aborted :-(
http://einsteinathome.org/workunit/33885575.
But please note also this is not the rule, most WUs work without such glitches. This is the exception, not the rule!
CU
BRM
RE: Result ID click for
)
One more has been added to the failure list for this WU:
85538101 928482 5 Jul 2007 21:02:57 UTC 11 Jul 2007 14:48:43 UTC Over Client error Done 87,653.78 87.15 ---
Yeah don't worry about that
)
Yeah don't worry about that testr2.....always more work for you to do to make up for that.......these 30+ hour versions are long but......your pc's don't mind!
(hey we started the exact same day on the Einstein Project)
RE: One more has been
)
Yes, but now you needn't worry any more :). The latest machine to join your quorum belongs to BarryAZ who will surely come to your rescue this time :).
A little suggestion for you. You will notice in your full results list that your latest three results (the so-called Bikeman Monsters) are all pending. You could increase your chance of having them validated sooner after you returned them by getting them a little in advance of actually needing them. This allows them to "mature" for a little before you start crunching them. You can do this by increasing your "connect to network" preference setting from the default 0.1 days to perhaps something like 2.0 or 3.0 days. Don't go beserk with this as there are nasty surprises when supporting multiple projects if the value is large. If you only run EAH, 3.0 days would be fine.
Cheers,
Gary.
RE: Yes, but now you
)
Who is a member of the most A-#1, primo Class Of Date going , IMHO! :-D
However, even though they shouldn't spend as much time pending than if you run the default CI or shorter, it doesn't help your RAC or anything like that. As you said, it can/will make CC scheduling more difficult in multi-project scenarios on a slower host. OTOH, on a single project box, no harm... no foul as they say. ;-)
Alinator
RE: RE: One more has
)
Thank you for the suggestion, as soon as i am sure I understand it, I will likely do it.
RE: RE: RE: One more
)
I'm confused! WU: results list
validated 3 times for 347 credits and once for 648 credits??? And still has 4 results "pending"??