will i ever get credit for this workunit

testr2
testr2
Joined: 18 Jan 05
Posts: 13
Credit: 653,354
RAC: 0
Topic 192951

Result ID
click for details Computer Sent Time reported
or deadline
explain Server state
explain Outcome
explain Client state
explain CPU time (sec) claimed credit granted credit
85044341 627016 12 Jun 2007 12:11:31 UTC 12 Jun 2007 12:14:06 UTC Over Client error Compute error 87.95 0.28 ---
85044342 849574 12 Jun 2007 17:40:43 UTC 20 Jun 2007 15:10:35 UTC Over Client error Aborted 303.03 0.53 ---
85044405 765129 12 Jun 2007 21:53:09 UTC 15 Jun 2007 17:51:57 UTC Over Success Done 91,835.70 347.98 pending
85214727 507054 21 Jun 2007 20:50:50 UTC 5 Jul 2007 20:50:50 UTC Over No reply New 0.00 --- ---
85538101 928482 5 Jul 2007 21:02:57 UTC 19 Jul 2007 21:02:57 UTC In Progress Unknown New --- --- ---

It does not look like this unit will ever complete. out of five attempts, i think mine is the only one to complete successfully. This is not one of the really large units.

Akos Fekete
Akos Fekete
Joined: 13 Nov 05
Posts: 560
Credit: 4,510,638
RAC: 0

will i ever get credit for this workunit

Don't worry...

Here is a better one: WU:33996370

testr2
testr2
Joined: 18 Jan 05
Posts: 13
Credit: 653,354
RAC: 0

RE: Don't worry... Here is

Message 69618 in response to message 69617

Quote:

Don't worry...

Here is a better one: WU:33996370

You're right, I won't complain about them anymore, I wondered if there were worse ones.

Alinator
Alinator
Joined: 8 May 05
Posts: 927
Credit: 9,352,143
RAC: 0

Probably part of the problem

Probably part of the problem is they were keyed to the old app when the work was generated. Some hosts have more trouble with the old app than others, even on Windows.

Alinator

Bikeman (Heinz-Bernd Eggenstein)
Bikeman (Heinz-...
Moderator
Joined: 28 Aug 06
Posts: 3,515
Credit: 450,629,879
RAC: 93,423

Hi! This one is

Hi!

This one is exceptional as well, note that the very first host succeeded (more than a month ago), and all hosts afterwards failed or were aborted :-(

http://einsteinathome.org/workunit/33885575.

But please note also this is not the rule, most WUs work without such glitches. This is the exception, not the rule!

CU

BRM

testr2
testr2
Joined: 18 Jan 05
Posts: 13
Credit: 653,354
RAC: 0

RE: Result ID click for

Quote:

Result ID
click for details Computer Sent Time reported
or deadline
explain Server state
explain Outcome
explain Client state
explain CPU time (sec) claimed credit granted credit
85044341 627016 12 Jun 2007 12:11:31 UTC 12 Jun 2007 12:14:06 UTC Over Client error Compute error 87.95 0.28 ---
85044342 849574 12 Jun 2007 17:40:43 UTC 20 Jun 2007 15:10:35 UTC Over Client error Aborted 303.03 0.53 ---
85044405 765129 12 Jun 2007 21:53:09 UTC 15 Jun 2007 17:51:57 UTC Over Success Done 91,835.70 347.98 pending
85214727 507054 21 Jun 2007 20:50:50 UTC 5 Jul 2007 20:50:50 UTC Over No reply New 0.00 --- ---
85538101 928482 5 Jul 2007 21:02:57 UTC 19 Jul 2007 21:02:57 UTC In Progress Unknown New --- --- ---

It does not look like this unit will ever complete. out of five attempts, i think mine is the only one to complete successfully. This is not one of the really large units.


One more has been added to the failure list for this WU:
85538101 928482 5 Jul 2007 21:02:57 UTC 11 Jul 2007 14:48:43 UTC Over Client error Done 87,653.78 87.15 ---

MAGIC Quantum Mechanic
MAGIC Quantum M...
Joined: 18 Jan 05
Posts: 1,293
Credit: 408,124,732
RAC: 53,384

Yeah don't worry about that

Yeah don't worry about that testr2.....always more work for you to do to make up for that.......these 30+ hour versions are long but......your pc's don't mind!

(hey we started the exact same day on the Einstein Project)

 

Gary Roberts
Gary Roberts
Moderator
Joined: 9 Feb 05
Posts: 5,126
Credit: 36,863,761,979
RAC: 37,740,511

RE: One more has been

Message 69623 in response to message 69621

Quote:

One more has been added to the failure list for this WU:
85538101 928482 5 Jul 2007 21:02:57 UTC 11 Jul 2007 14:48:43 UTC Over Client error Done 87,653.78 87.15 ---

Yes, but now you needn't worry any more :). The latest machine to join your quorum belongs to BarryAZ who will surely come to your rescue this time :).

A little suggestion for you. You will notice in your full results list that your latest three results (the so-called Bikeman Monsters) are all pending. You could increase your chance of having them validated sooner after you returned them by getting them a little in advance of actually needing them. This allows them to "mature" for a little before you start crunching them. You can do this by increasing your "connect to network" preference setting from the default 0.1 days to perhaps something like 2.0 or 3.0 days. Don't go beserk with this as there are nasty surprises when supporting multiple projects if the value is large. If you only run EAH, 3.0 days would be fine.

Cheers,
Gary.

Alinator
Alinator
Joined: 8 May 05
Posts: 927
Credit: 9,352,143
RAC: 0

RE: Yes, but now you

Message 69624 in response to message 69623

Quote:
Yes, but now you needn't worry any more :). The latest machine to join your quorum belongs to BarryAZ who will surely come to your rescue this time :).

Who is a member of the most A-#1, primo Class Of Date going , IMHO! :-D

Quote:

A little suggestion for you. You will notice in your full results list that your latest three results (the so-called Bikeman Monsters) are all pending. You could increase your chance of having them validated sooner after you returned them by getting them a little in advance of actually needing them. This allows them to "mature" for a little before you start crunching them. You can do this by increasing your "connect to network" preference setting from the default 0.1 days to perhaps something like 2.0 or 3.0 days. Don't go beserk with this as there are nasty surprises when supporting multiple projects if the value is large. If you only run EAH, 3.0 days would be fine.

However, even though they shouldn't spend as much time pending than if you run the default CI or shorter, it doesn't help your RAC or anything like that. As you said, it can/will make CC scheduling more difficult in multi-project scenarios on a slower host. OTOH, on a single project box, no harm... no foul as they say. ;-)

Alinator

testr2
testr2
Joined: 18 Jan 05
Posts: 13
Credit: 653,354
RAC: 0

RE: RE: One more has

Message 69625 in response to message 69623

Quote:
Quote:

One more has been added to the failure list for this WU:
85538101 928482 5 Jul 2007 21:02:57 UTC 11 Jul 2007 14:48:43 UTC Over Client error Done 87,653.78 87.15 ---

Yes, but now you needn't worry any more :). The latest machine to join your quorum belongs to BarryAZ who will surely come to your rescue this time :).

A little suggestion for you. You will notice in your full results list that your latest three results (the so-called Bikeman Monsters) are all pending. You could increase your chance of having them validated sooner after you returned them by getting them a little in advance of actually needing them. This allows them to "mature" for a little before you start crunching them. You can do this by increasing your "connect to network" preference setting from the default 0.1 days to perhaps something like 2.0 or 3.0 days. Don't go beserk with this as there are nasty surprises when supporting multiple projects if the value is large. If you only run EAH, 3.0 days would be fine.

Thank you for the suggestion, as soon as i am sure I understand it, I will likely do it.

ohiomike
ohiomike
Joined: 4 Nov 06
Posts: 80
Credit: 6,453,639
RAC: 0

RE: RE: RE: One more

Message 69626 in response to message 69625

Quote:
Quote:
Quote:

One more has been added to the failure list for this WU:
85538101 928482 5 Jul 2007 21:02:57 UTC 11 Jul 2007 14:48:43 UTC Over Client error Done 87,653.78 87.15 ---

Yes, but now you needn't worry any more :). The latest machine to join your quorum belongs to BarryAZ who will surely come to your rescue this time :).

A little suggestion for you. You will notice in your full results list that your latest three results (the so-called Bikeman Monsters) are all pending. You could increase your chance of having them validated sooner after you returned them by getting them a little in advance of actually needing them. This allows them to "mature" for a little before you start crunching them. You can do this by increasing your "connect to network" preference setting from the default 0.1 days to perhaps something like 2.0 or 3.0 days. Don't go beserk with this as there are nasty surprises when supporting multiple projects if the value is large. If you only run EAH, 3.0 days would be fine.

Thank you for the suggestion, as soon as i am sure I understand it, I will likely do it.

I'm confused! WU: results list
validated 3 times for 347 credits and once for 648 credits??? And still has 4 results "pending"??


Comment viewing options

Select your preferred way to display the comments and click "Save settings" to activate your changes.