h1_0418.90_S5R2 completion times

arcturus
arcturus
Joined: 11 Feb 05
Posts: 44
Credit: 1008160
RAC: 0
Topic 192836

This is a recent work unit that's come down the pipe. Just curious how quickly it's taking your pc's to crunch it. Yah it's unscientific and probably has variations. Oh well.

OS: Linux
Processor: AMD 2600+ Barton
Frequency: 2.34 Ghz
Completion Time: 59,598.96

Bikeman (Heinz-Bernd Eggenstein)
Bikeman (Heinz-...
Moderator
Joined: 28 Aug 06
Posts: 3522
Credit: 714505883
RAC: 920481

h1_0418.90_S5R2 completion times

Quote:

This is a recent work unit that's come down the pipe. Just curious how quickly it's taking your pc's to crunch it. Yah it's unscientific and probably has variations. Oh well.

OS: Linux
Processor: AMD 2600+ Barton
Frequency: 2.34 Ghz
Completion Time: 59,598.96

Hi!

Strange, your CPU is Listed as "AuthenticAMD Unknown CPU Typ". Is it an Engineering Sample sor something like this??

CU

BRM

arcturus
arcturus
Joined: 11 Feb 05
Posts: 44
Credit: 1008160
RAC: 0

No, when it's not running

No, when it's not running stock it tends to do this, at least with this particular core.

arcturus
arcturus
Joined: 11 Feb 05
Posts: 44
Credit: 1008160
RAC: 0

Unit was just

Unit was just validated:

OS: Windows XP
Processor: Pentium D
Frequency: 3 Ghz
Completion Time: 105,900.70

Bikeman (Heinz-Bernd Eggenstein)
Bikeman (Heinz-...
Moderator
Joined: 28 Aug 06
Posts: 3522
Credit: 714505883
RAC: 920481

RE: Unit was just

Message 68099 in response to message 68098

Quote:

Unit was just validated:

OS: Windows XP
Processor: Pentium D
Frequency: 3 Ghz
Completion Time: 105,900.70

Soooo....you overclocked the box??

CU

BRM

arcturus
arcturus
Joined: 11 Feb 05
Posts: 44
Credit: 1008160
RAC: 0

Yes indeed.

Yes indeed.

Conan
Conan
Joined: 19 Jun 05
Posts: 172
Credit: 8246503
RAC: 8785

Whilst I don't appear to have

Whilst I don't appear to have yet had that particular WU type (0418.90), I have a few others (which for some reason appear to go to specific computers).

WU Type : 0258.55
OS: Linux
Processor: AMD Opteron 275
Frequency: 2.20 Ghz
Completion Time: ave 72,906 seconds

WU Type : 0504.85
OS: Linux
Processor: AMD Opteron 275
Frequency: 2.20 Ghz
Completion Time: est 79,538.40 seconds

WU Type : 0375.90
OS: Linux
Processor: AMD Opteron 275
Frequency: 2.20 Ghz
Completion Time: ave 52,205 seconds

WU Type : 0453.55
OS: Linux
Processor: AMD Opteron 285
Frequency: 2.60 Ghz
Completion Time: ave 59,304 seconds

WU Type : 0447.85
OS: Linux
Processor: AMD Opteron 285
Frequency: 2.60 Ghz
Completion Time: ave 56,534 seconds

This mainly shows different run times for the different 'frequencies'? of each workunit.
Can't tell if the 0453.55 WU type would run slower on my 2.2 GHz computer as none have been sent to it, both the 0453.55 and 0447.85 have only been sent to my faster computers (I have 2 Opteron 285's but each has been sent only one type of work unit).

ohiomike
ohiomike
Joined: 4 Nov 06
Posts: 80
Credit: 6453639
RAC: 0

That answers one question

That answers one question I've had. I always wondered if the Opty's were faster than the Athlons. They are, I take about 64,1xx seconds to complete a 435.xx WU with a 5600+ X2 (2.8 GHz).


Comment viewing options

Select your preferred way to display the comments and click "Save settings" to activate your changes.