I've suspended my network activity until the validator is shown back online.
It's only updated every 20 min so it could be fine now. But I with you, I lost a lot of work to this, better safe than sorry.
There are 10^11 stars in the galaxy. That used to be a huge number. But it's only a hundred billion. It's less than the national deficit! We used to call them astronomical numbers. Now we should call them economical numbers. - Richard Feynman
I may not be "official", but I did get an answer from Bruce Allen:
Quote:
Thanks a lot for pointing this out. It appears that for about 8 hours our validator was marking all results as 'validate error'. I don't know why this happened: restarting the validator seems to have fixed this.
I'm going to write a script to grant credit to all the results which got marked as validate errors in this time interval.
As far as I can tell things
)
As far as I can tell things are working again.
I happened to get on the other side on this WU 8067314.
PROBLEM SEEMS TO BE
)
PROBLEM SEEMS TO BE FIXED!
Just sent up 4 WUs and all validated o.k.
Credit is being granted
)
Credit is being granted again. Not sure if problem is completely fixed. Also woder what going to happen to all the "lost" work?
RE: Just sent up 4 WUs and
)
I've suspended my network activity until the validator is shown back online.
RE: I've suspended my
)
It's only updated every 20 min so it could be fine now. But I with you, I lost a lot of work to this, better safe than sorry.
There are 10^11 stars in the galaxy. That used to be a huge number. But it's only a hundred billion. It's less than the national deficit! We used to call them astronomical numbers. Now we should call them economical numbers. - Richard Feynman
2:56 PM UTC on Thursday, 11
)
2:56 PM UTC on Thursday, 11 May 2006
Albert validator is now "running"
But we should still wait until someone "official" gives a statement.
RE: 2:56 PM UTC on
)
But don't hold your breath. Unless you are David Blaine, and then some.
Dead men don't get the baby washed. HTH
I may not be "official", but
)
I may not be "official", but I did get an answer from Bruce Allen:
There is potential bad news
)
There is potential bad news for everybody:
The oldest reported result, I have found, that might have suffered from this was reported on 5 May 2006 at 15:01:21 UTC.
First good :) 8138960
)
First good :) 8138960