My first WU using U41.04 was in the same ballpark as the times my 2.4 Ghz P4 (Prescott) had been recording using S41.06 (and that is a big improvement relative to my brief experience w/U41.01).
Having completed 20+ WU's now, it looks like U41.04 takes 2 to 3% longer to process than S41.06 on my 2.4 Ghz P4 (Prescott). Therefore, I am going to switch back to the "S" series.
Interesting times:
Dual Xeon 3.4GHz with HT ... 4 logical processors ... 4 WU at the same time.
S39L ... 6799 s/WU
S41.06 ... 8067 s/WU
U40.04 ... 7859 s/WU
So S39L seems to be best for this kind of processor.
Akos,
I don't like HT at all ;) that's why I have amd64 at home. But why not use such a HW like dual Xeon 3.4 if it's available ;) even when I can not switch HT off. I would like to do it, at least for testm but owner will kill me, I'm happy that he is agree with running it as it is.
But sure, HT is not very good for such a computing as Juraj Kotulic Bunta (my team mate) already wrote.
Just to be clear, original times on this host were around 25.000 seconds!!! So anyway it is 4 times faster now!!! Great job!!!
Quote:
Quote:
Dual Xeon 3.4GHz with HT...
...S39L seems to be best for this kind of processor.
After finishing about 400-500 WUs on my AMD X2 using U41.04, I got 5 invalid results.
It seems, I'm the only one?
I'm using AndyKs script to check my PC. It's been running... several hundreds of U41.04s I think. Now it says I have 800WUs in the database and there's something wrong with 8 of them. I know that shortly before switching to U41.04 I did some alpha testing for other clients, which didn't work out too well, so at that point it showed 7 WUs with red status, with others possibly still waiting for a quorum.
-> bottom line: I can't say it for sure, but it's very probable that I have much less than 5 invalid results with U41.04 ;)
Using a P4 3.2 Prescott with HT enable here and S40.03 was returning results in ~6,200 secs. U41.04 is finishing in ~4,500 secs. I am running multiple projects on this machine so Einstein does not get to run two instances at the same time.
Thanks for your promotion. ;-)
For everyone which has Java disabled (menu is in java), or don't understand german here is the direct link: http://www.andyk.de/boinc/pc.php
btw: Om my fathers computer (P4 3,2 HT) my times have decreased dramatically: S40.12
7068
7302
S41.07HT
5238
5285
5187
Don't know If I should try the U41.04... but I think I will.
To shorten crunching times I use the trick in the truxoft_prefs.xml:
Einstein@Home,SETI@Home
RE: My first WU using
)
Having completed 20+ WU's now, it looks like U41.04 takes 2 to 3% longer to process than S41.06 on my 2.4 Ghz P4 (Prescott). Therefore, I am going to switch back to the "S" series.
For my P4 2.4a ghz Prescott
)
For my P4 2.4a ghz Prescott over the past week...
U41.04 2 results at 3800 seconds with 15% overclocking
S41.07 1 result at 4200 seconds without overclocking
U41.02 2 results at 3600-3800 seconds without overclocking
S40.x 3 results at 6000 seconds without overclocking
Human Stupidity Is Infinite...
After finishing about 400-500
)
After finishing about 400-500 WUs on my AMD X2 using U41.04, I got 5 invalid results.
It seems, I'm the only one?
cu,
Michael
Interesting times: Dual Xeon
)
Interesting times:
Dual Xeon 3.4GHz with HT ... 4 logical processors ... 4 WU at the same time.
S39L ... 6799 s/WU
S41.06 ... 8067 s/WU
U40.04 ... 7859 s/WU
So S39L seems to be best for this kind of processor.
ALL GLORY TO THE HYPNOTOAD!
Do You Dare?
Potrebujete pomoc?
RE: Dual Xeon 3.4GHz with
)
I would like to notice:
Akos, I don't like HT at all
)
Akos,
I don't like HT at all ;) that's why I have amd64 at home. But why not use such a HW like dual Xeon 3.4 if it's available ;) even when I can not switch HT off. I would like to do it, at least for testm but owner will kill me, I'm happy that he is agree with running it as it is.
But sure, HT is not very good for such a computing as Juraj Kotulic Bunta (my team mate) already wrote.
Just to be clear, original times on this host were around 25.000 seconds!!! So anyway it is 4 times faster now!!! Great job!!!
ALL GLORY TO THE HYPNOTOAD!
Do You Dare?
Potrebujete pomoc?
RE: After finishing about
)
I'm using AndyKs script to check my PC. It's been running... several hundreds of U41.04s I think. Now it says I have 800WUs in the database and there's something wrong with 8 of them. I know that shortly before switching to U41.04 I did some alpha testing for other clients, which didn't work out too well, so at that point it showed 7 WUs with red status, with others possibly still waiting for a quorum.
-> bottom line: I can't say it for sure, but it's very probable that I have much less than 5 invalid results with U41.04 ;)
MrS
Scanning for our furry friends since Jan 2002
Using a P4 3.2 Prescott with
)
Using a P4 3.2 Prescott with HT enable here and S40.03 was returning results in ~6,200 secs. U41.04 is finishing in ~4,500 secs. I am running multiple projects on this machine so Einstein does not get to run two instances at the same time.
Get BOINC WIKIed
U41.04 is approximately 7.5%
)
U41.04 is approximately 7.5% faster than S41.07 on my p4 Prescott 3.4 GHz without HT.
RE: RE: After finishing
)
Thanks for your promotion. ;-)
For everyone which has Java disabled (menu is in java), or don't understand german here is the direct link: http://www.andyk.de/boinc/pc.php
btw: Om my fathers computer (P4 3,2 HT) my times have decreased dramatically:
S40.12
7068
7302
S41.07HT
5238
5285
5187
Don't know If I should try the U41.04... but I think I will.
To shorten crunching times I use the trick in the truxoft_prefs.xml:
Einstein@Home,SETI@Home
AndyK
Want to know your pending credit?
The biggest bug is sitting 10 inch in front of the screen.