I will try C41.01 on our Pentium II.....it will take about 10 hours for a result though....Cheers, Rog
As will I
There are 10^11 stars in the galaxy. That used to be a huge number. But it's only a hundred billion. It's less than the national deficit! We used to call them astronomical numbers. Now we should call them economical numbers. - Richard Feynman
I will try C41.01 on our Pentium II.....it will take about 10 hours for a result though....Cheers, Rog
>OK, WU finally done and these WUs have been fairly consistent so comparison should be close:
C40.00=41422 sec.
C41.00=37372 sec.
C41.01=35623 sec.
It appears to be ~5% improvement over C41.00 and ~16% over C40.00! No validation yet, but sure looks impressive so far ie. 1.6 hour difference in real terms for this machine. Thanks, Akosf.....you've done it again! Cheers, Rog.
I will try C41.01 on our Pentium II.....it will take about 10 hours for a result though....Cheers, Rog
>OK, WU finally done and these WUs have been fairly consistent so comparison should be close:
C40.00=41422 sec.
C41.00=37372 sec.
C41.01=35623 sec.
It appears to be ~5% improvement over C41.00 and ~16% over C40.00! No validation yet, but sure looks impressive so far ie. 1.6 hour difference in real terms for this machine. Thanks, Akosf.....you've done it again! Cheers, Rog.
>WU validated OK this morning....Cheers all 'round for Akosf!
RE: I will try C41.01 on
)
As will I
There are 10^11 stars in the galaxy. That used to be a huge number. But it's only a hundred billion. It's less than the national deficit! We used to call them astronomical numbers. Now we should call them economical numbers. - Richard Feynman
RE: I will try C41.01 on
)
>OK, WU finally done and these WUs have been fairly consistent so comparison should be close:
C40.00=41422 sec.
C41.00=37372 sec.
C41.01=35623 sec.
It appears to be ~5% improvement over C41.00 and ~16% over C40.00! No validation yet, but sure looks impressive so far ie. 1.6 hour difference in real terms for this machine. Thanks, Akosf.....you've done it again! Cheers, Rog.
RE: RE: I will try C41.01
)
>WU validated OK this morning....Cheers all 'round for Akosf!