C41.00 Observation Thread

archae86
archae86
Joined: 6 Dec 05
Posts: 3,071
Credit: 6,027,590,362
RAC: 2,379,754

RE: The short Einstein

Message 29340 in response to message 29337

Quote:

The short Einstein result was r1_0265.5_2133_S4R2a_0) and I ran it on my Gallatin (Northwood-descended 2M L3 cache--the first P4 EE), hyperthreaded, with the other BOINC job also an Einstein job:

S40.12 2345 seconds
S40.04 1933 seconds
C41.00 2486 seconds

Now I've run the same test result on the same host for C41.01.

C41.01 3355 seconds

So for this machine (admittedly not akosf's target architecture for this version), C41.01 slowed things down with a 1.35 cpu time ratio to C41.00.

Akos Fekete
Akos Fekete
Joined: 13 Nov 05
Posts: 561
Credit: 4,527,270
RAC: 0

RE: S40.12 2345

Message 29341 in response to message 29340

Quote:

S40.12 2345 seconds
S40.04 1933 seconds
C41.00 2486 seconds
C41.01 3355 seconds

So for this machine (admittedly not akosf's target architecture for this version), C41.01 slowed things down with a 1.35 cpu time ratio to C41.00.

impossible

C41.00 -> 3486 seconds (it sounds much better)

archae86
archae86
Joined: 6 Dec 05
Posts: 3,071
Credit: 6,027,590,362
RAC: 2,379,754

RE: RE: S40.12 2345

Message 29342 in response to message 29341

Quote:
Quote:

S40.12 2345 seconds
S40.04 1933 seconds
C41.00 2486 seconds
C41.01 3355 seconds

So for this machine (admittedly not akosf's target architecture for this version), C41.01 slowed things down with a 1.35 cpu time ratio to C41.00.

impossible

C41.00 -> 3486 seconds (it sounds much better)

No, not impossible, but true. The actual measurements were in minutes and seconds, so I'll report them here:

S40.12 39:05
S40.04 32:13
C41.00 41:26
C41.01 55:55

Akos Fekete
Akos Fekete
Joined: 13 Nov 05
Posts: 561
Credit: 4,527,270
RAC: 0

RE: No, not impossible, but

Message 29343 in response to message 29342

Quote:

No, not impossible, but true. The actual measurements were in minutes and seconds, so I'll report them here:

S40.12 39:05
S40.04 32:13
C41.00 41:26
C41.01 55:55

Could you do a new measuremnt with C41.00?

archae86
archae86
Joined: 6 Dec 05
Posts: 3,071
Credit: 6,027,590,362
RAC: 2,379,754

RE: Could you do a new

Message 29344 in response to message 29343

Quote:
Could you do a new measuremnt with C41.00?

Yes, I'll start it now--results in about an hour.

AnRM
AnRM
Joined: 9 Feb 05
Posts: 213
Credit: 4,346,941
RAC: 0

I will try C41.01 on our

I will try C41.01 on our Pentium II.....it will take about 10 hours for a result though....Cheers, Rog

archae86
archae86
Joined: 6 Dec 05
Posts: 3,071
Credit: 6,027,590,362
RAC: 2,379,754

RE: RE: No, not

Message 29346 in response to message 29343

Quote:
Quote:

No, not impossible, but true. The actual measurements were in minutes and seconds, so I'll report them here:

S40.12 39:05
S40.04 32:13
C41.00 41:26
C41.01 55:55

Could you do a new measuremnt with C41.00?

My retry was close to my previous C41.00 time
C41.00 41:11 (execution ratio to previous trial .994)

Akos Fekete
Akos Fekete
Joined: 13 Nov 05
Posts: 561
Credit: 4,527,270
RAC: 0

RE: RE: RE: No, not

Message 29347 in response to message 29346

Quote:
Quote:
Quote:

No, not impossible, but true. The actual measurements were in minutes and seconds, so I'll report them here:

S40.12 39:05
S40.04 32:13
C41.00 41:26
C41.01 55:55

Could you do a new measuremnt with C41.00?
My retry was close to my previous C41.00 time
C41.00 41:11 (execution ratio to previous trial .994)

Thanks. I'm really surprised.

M. Schmitt
M. Schmitt
Joined: 27 Jun 05
Posts: 478
Credit: 15,872,262
RAC: 0

I think a P4 with HT is no

I think a P4 with HT is no good basis for comparing result times of the C4x apps.

The comparison schould be done on a cpu, the C-apps are build for.

I have a Celeron 433 crunching, but it's running under WINE and many WUs are repoted with 0 time, so I will not be able to compare any results.

So let's be patient and wait for people with older CPUs reporting there experiences.

cu,
Michael

AnRM
AnRM
Joined: 9 Feb 05
Posts: 213
Credit: 4,346,941
RAC: 0

Hi again....our 400MHz PII is

Hi again....our 400MHz PII is about 25% through the WU and a projection of the time to completion indicates at least a 1% increase in speed over C41.00....Cheers, Rog.

Comment viewing options

Select your preferred way to display the comments and click "Save settings" to activate your changes.