C41.00 Observation Thread

Dave Burbank
Dave Burbank
Joined: 30 Jan 06
Posts: 275
Credit: 1,548,376
RAC: 0

RE: I will try C41.01 on

Message 29350 in response to message 29345

Quote:
I will try C41.01 on our Pentium II.....it will take about 10 hours for a result though....Cheers, Rog

As will I

There are 10^11 stars in the galaxy. That used to be a huge number. But it's only a hundred billion. It's less than the national deficit! We used to call them astronomical numbers. Now we should call them economical numbers. - Richard Feynman

AnRM
AnRM
Joined: 9 Feb 05
Posts: 213
Credit: 4,346,941
RAC: 0

RE: I will try C41.01 on

Message 29351 in response to message 29345

Quote:
I will try C41.01 on our Pentium II.....it will take about 10 hours for a result though....Cheers, Rog


>OK, WU finally done and these WUs have been fairly consistent so comparison should be close:
C40.00=41422 sec.
C41.00=37372 sec.
C41.01=35623 sec.
It appears to be ~5% improvement over C41.00 and ~16% over C40.00! No validation yet, but sure looks impressive so far ie. 1.6 hour difference in real terms for this machine. Thanks, Akosf.....you've done it again! Cheers, Rog.

AnRM
AnRM
Joined: 9 Feb 05
Posts: 213
Credit: 4,346,941
RAC: 0

RE: RE: I will try C41.01

Message 29352 in response to message 29351

Quote:
Quote:
I will try C41.01 on our Pentium II.....it will take about 10 hours for a result though....Cheers, Rog

>OK, WU finally done and these WUs have been fairly consistent so comparison should be close:
C40.00=41422 sec.
C41.00=37372 sec.
C41.01=35623 sec.
It appears to be ~5% improvement over C41.00 and ~16% over C40.00! No validation yet, but sure looks impressive so far ie. 1.6 hour difference in real terms for this machine. Thanks, Akosf.....you've done it again! Cheers, Rog.

>WU validated OK this morning....Cheers all 'round for Akosf!

Comment viewing options

Select your preferred way to display the comments and click "Save settings" to activate your changes.