How can we tell if we are getting the small or large work units?
I suggest that this occurs because of the two different ligo sites. So there are "r" units and "z" units. I experienced the r wus to be smaller so they are getting done earlier but tell me if I'm wrong.
How can we tell if we are getting the small or large work units?
I suggest that this occurs because of the two different ligo sites. So there are "r" units and "z" units. I experienced the r wus to be smaller so they are getting done earlier but tell me if I'm wrong.
All my "r" units have been longer...However, my "z" units have been mixed (though most tend to be shorter).
The second surprise.
I was waiting these results, but I expected bigger difference before them.
Thanks Stef!
Quote:
great work akosf!
Thank all crunchers!
On my P3T 1.26Ghz (running at 1.35) comparing S39 with S39L the new version is 7.2% faster. It crunch 2 WUs (it's a Dualboard) parallel in 1:51 with S39L. (S39: 2h, A36: 3:25h, C37: 3:35h)
On my P3T 1.26Ghz (running at 1.35) comparing S39 with S39L the new version is 7.2% faster. It crunch 2 WUs (it's a Dualboard) parallel in 1:51 with S39L. (S39: 2h, A36: 3:25h, C37: 3:35h)
Now after some more averaging I can confirm 7.3% on the P3T for C39L vs C39.
On the Mobile P3 it runs 2.2% faster. This is interesting, because the CPUs are nearly identical apart from the L2 size (512kB vs. 256kB) and bus/memory clock (133 vs 100MHz).
How can we tell if we are getting the small or large work units?
I suggest that this occurs because of the two different ligo sites. So there are "r" units and "z" units. I experienced the r wus to be smaller so they are getting done earlier but tell me if I'm wrong.
All my "r" units have been longer...However, my "z" units have been mixed (though most tend to be shorter).
Both R and Z units come in short and long varieties. I've got all 4 varients in my queue at present. UNfortunately most're the <20m short type. I'm in danger of starvation in a day or two if I stay 100% E@H.
RE: RE: How can we tell
)
perhaps you wrong...:) Z still have small wu.
Wish you can understand my English:)
RE: RE: How can we tell
)
All my "r" units have been longer...However, my "z" units have been mixed (though most tend to be shorter).
RE: RE: Here are the
)
My Laptop Pentium4 2,8 GHz HT Results:
WU 1469,5 Hz S39=5967 s
WU 1469,5 Hz S39L=5235 s
~ -12%
Great Work, Thx
Chris
*Die Signatur befindet sich aus technischen Gründen auf der Rückseite dieses Beitrages!*
Finally broken the 4,000 sec
)
Finally broken the 4,000 sec barrier.
Comparing S39 to S39L, I've seen around a 6% increase which seems on par with other people.
Just installed S39L onto a Pentium 4 HT 2.8GHz box and attached Einstein.
Initial completion time 7 hrs 54mins. Currrently at 52% after 1hr 22mins.
Akosf......you da man.
Wish I could congratulate you in your native language but I can't.
Keep up the good work
<-- Cheers
RE: RE: Here are the
)
On my P3T 1.26Ghz (running at 1.35) comparing S39 with S39L the new version is 7.2% faster. It crunch 2 WUs (it's a Dualboard) parallel in 1:51 with S39L. (S39: 2h, A36: 3:25h, C37: 3:35h)
RE: Finally broken the
)
(Shocked).....
you can always wreck time, but don't wreck science.... pun intended..... :P
S39L getting about the same
)
S39L getting about the same 6% decrease in comp time over S39 on both my Pentium M740 and 830D (both are WinXP sp2).
On AMD Opteron 280, S39L runs
)
On AMD Opteron 280, S39L runs ~55% faster than A36. I don't have results for other apps.
Metod ...
RE: On my P3T 1.26Ghz
)
Now after some more averaging I can confirm 7.3% on the P3T for C39L vs C39.
On the Mobile P3 it runs 2.2% faster. This is interesting, because the CPUs are nearly identical apart from the L2 size (512kB vs. 256kB) and bus/memory clock (133 vs 100MHz).
RE: RE: RE: How can we
)
Both R and Z units come in short and long varieties. I've got all 4 varients in my queue at present. UNfortunately most're the <20m short type. I'm in danger of starvation in a day or two if I stay 100% E@H.