I was without Internet access for ~2 weeks. Having returned, and having reported Some WUs too late, I'm back in the crunching business. The Projects tab accurately shows my Work done as 3907292.75, and Avg. work done as 2336.33, whereas the Statistics tab indicates Work done as ~18480 and Avg. work done as ~143. Updating after completing a new WU does not change the discrepancy. Any ideas what's going on, and how to correct the problem? TIA
Edit: My Credit and RAC are more accurately shown to the left of this post.
"Remember, nothing that's good works by itself, just to please you. You have to make the damn thing work." Thomas A. Edison
Copyright © 2024 Einstein@Home. All rights reserved.
Projects and Statistics tabs show VERY different work done & avg
)
Are you sure you're not mixing projects up, this is Einstein@home,
at Cosmology@Home you have just reported 4 Workunits, prior to reporting them you'll have had 18480 Credits, now you have 20,160 Credits there, and a RAC of 232.18
Claggy
I just now noticed that
)
I just now noticed that myself. The numbers show that I don't do much for Cosmology anymore. I used to, but now I'm devoted to discovering something amazing. Anyway, it was a false alarm. Everybody can relax again.:-D
Steve
"Remember, nothing that's good works by itself, just to please you. You have to make the damn thing work." Thomas A. Edison
RE: I just now noticed that
)
The other thing it is a webpage and it does NOT get updated instantly, it is usually in the 1 hour range for the Server to make the updates at most projects. SOME THINGS are fairly instant but no everything.
RE: The other thing it is a
)
What do you mean by 'it' in "it is a webpage"? The OP clearly mentioned the Statistics tab (in BOINC Manager) and that is not a webpage. The data displayed there is entirely local and is updated every time the client contacts the server. If you want to see the very latest available info, simply 'update' the project prior to selecting the Statistics tab. The problem was nothing to do with out-of-date info. The OP was simply looking at the info for the wrong project.
It's quite OK to offer an opinion about a topic that is open to debate. It's not helpful to make sweeping statements that are not correct and are likely to confuse the readership in general. Please keep in mind that there are lots of occasional readers who may not have enough experience to judge for themselves, the accuracy of what they are reading.
Cheers,
Gary.
RE: RE: The other thing
)
SORRY...I misread the post and ASSUMED he was talking about the website stats!
IT WON'T HAPPEN AGAIN!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!