Don't know if this is a case where the project is now rejecting results from the prototypes, but if not may show why we were asked to stop using them.
Alinator
This is just a single _invalid_ result, the reason might be whatever.
All others are still valid and accepted: results
And there are a lot of people still not using the official app.
I wonder how they can be so fast with installing Akos's patches and now don't have any more eye on this forum.
This smells like purpose.
cu,
Michael
Michael
Looking at your results it looks as of you are still using the optomized applicatins. Please read This message.
Yes a lot of people get a good running one and have not been back to the boards, may take a while for all to find out that they can not use the optomized applicatins.
This is just a single _invalid_ result, the reason might be whatever.
All others are still valid and accepted: results
And there are a lot of people still not using the official app.
I wonder how they can be so fast with installing Akos's patches and now don't have any more eye on this forum.
This smells like purpose.
cu,
Michael
Agreed, anecdotal at best, but he hadn't had any other validation failures, and the other two were stockers. My point is there may be other valid concerns beyond just not having been given an official blessing.
LOL, yes, never underestimate the "selective" post reading skills of DC volunteers! :-)
Don't know if this is a case where the project is now rejecting results from the prototypes, but if not may show why we were asked to stop using them.
Alinator
This is just a single _invalid_ result, the reason might be whatever.
All others are still valid and accepted: results
And there are a lot of people still not using the official app.
I wonder how they can be so fast with installing Akos's patches and now don't have any more eye on this forum.
This smells like purpose.
cu,
Michael
Michael
Looking at your results it looks as of you are still using the optomized applicatins. Please read This message.
I'm sorry, but you are wrong. ;)
Only my small Linux box is still crunching for E@H, all other host run for SIMAP. The X2 has still some WUs in cache, but I'll wait till I read an official statement here, before I kill them.
Anyway there is no app_info.xml and no patched app on this host anymore. ;)
Quote:
Yes a lot of people get a good running one and have not been back to the boards, may take a while for all to find out that they can not use the optomized applicatins.
I think this is a little blue-eyed. People who installed a patched app are for shure permanently looking if they can download any even faster patch. So to me this looks more like catching the higher credits/day as long as it's possible. :(
cu,
Michael
[edit]Btw, I was the one who yelled "ALERT!" in our team-forum.
(German, and time is UTC+2h)
[/edit]
Sorry if I mis read that, I was just going by the unit you turned in today which said
5.4.9
2006-06-28 13:22:45.0960 [normal]: E@H S5R1 4.02 SSE-0007 STABLE
2006-06-28 13:22:45.0960 [normal]: Started search at lalDebugLevel = 0
2006-06-28 13:22:45.6742 [normal]: Checkpoint-file 'Fstat.out.ckp' not found.
2006-06-28 13:22:45.6742 [normal]: No usable checkpoint found, starting from beginning.
Detected CPU type 1
2006-06-28 14:21:28.7367 [normal]: Search finished successfully.
All of mine have:
2006-06-26 18:03:06.2968 [normal]: Start of BOINC application 'projects/einstein.phys.uwm.edu/einstein_S5R1_4.02_windows_intelx86.exe'.
Sorry if I mis read that, I was just going by the unit you turned in today which said
5.4.9
2006-06-28 13:22:45.0960 [normal]: E@H S5R1 4.02 SSE-0007 STABLE
2006-06-28 13:22:45.0960 [normal]: Started search at lalDebugLevel = 0
2006-06-28 13:22:45.6742 [normal]: Checkpoint-file 'Fstat.out.ckp' not found.
2006-06-28 13:22:45.6742 [normal]: No usable checkpoint found, starting from beginning.
Detected CPU type 1
2006-06-28 14:21:28.7367 [normal]: Search finished successfully.
All of mine have:
2006-06-26 18:03:06.2968 [normal]: Start of BOINC application 'projects/einstein.phys.uwm.edu/einstein_S5R1_4.02_windows_intelx86.exe'.
for the line in bold above.
Cheers
Ray
I don't know where you got this stderr_txt from, but it's not from me! Here is an overview over my hosts and as you can see, only my Linux box has still contact with the E@H project.
So please, if you come up with such words and advises, give me a link to verify.
The result you're looking at was posted as a random example. It is not from any of Michael's machines. He hasn't turned in an Einstein result since the 26th.
My error, was thinking it was a link to his, sorry about that.
Too bad there is no way to got the info out to the ones who have not stopped back to the boards. I am sure that many got a patch and have not visited since.
Ray
[EDIT]
Since that belongs to Anonymous there is no way of contacting him (or her).
The result you're looking at was posted as a random example. It is not from any of Michael's machines. He hasn't turned in an Einstein result since the 26th.
Dig
Yes, I pulled the result from another post here in NC where the user was wondering about the validation failure.
The result you're looking at was posted as a random example. It is not from any of Michael's machines. He hasn't turned in an Einstein result since the 26th.
The result you're looking at was posted as a random example. It is not from any of Michael's machines. He hasn't turned in an Einstein result since the 26th.
Dig
My Cereron 433(Linux) feels offended now. ;)
cu,
Michael
Very sorry Michael, thought that was a link to yours, but it is not.
These long ones can really take a long time to run, liked the shorter ones better, but the credit works out the same.
Ray
RE: RE: Here's a result
)
Michael
Looking at your results it looks as of you are still using the optomized applicatins. Please read This message.
Yes a lot of people get a good running one and have not been back to the boards, may take a while for all to find out that they can not use the optomized applicatins.
Try the Pizza@Home project, good crunching.
RE: This is just a single
)
Agreed, anecdotal at best, but he hadn't had any other validation failures, and the other two were stockers. My point is there may be other valid concerns beyond just not having been given an official blessing.
LOL, yes, never underestimate the "selective" post reading skills of DC volunteers! :-)
Alinator
RE: RE: RE: Here's a
)
I'm sorry, but you are wrong. ;)
Only my small Linux box is still crunching for E@H, all other host run for SIMAP. The X2 has still some WUs in cache, but I'll wait till I read an official statement here, before I kill them.
Anyway there is no app_info.xml and no patched app on this host anymore. ;)
I think this is a little blue-eyed. People who installed a patched app are for shure permanently looking if they can download any even faster patch. So to me this looks more like catching the higher credits/day as long as it's possible. :(
cu,
Michael
[edit]Btw, I was the one who yelled "ALERT!" in our team-forum.
(German, and time is UTC+2h)
[/edit]
Sorry if I mis read that, I
)
Sorry if I mis read that, I was just going by the unit you turned in today which said
5.4.9
2006-06-28 13:22:45.0960 [normal]: E@H S5R1 4.02 SSE-0007 STABLE
2006-06-28 13:22:45.0960 [normal]: Started search at lalDebugLevel = 0
2006-06-28 13:22:45.6742 [normal]: Checkpoint-file 'Fstat.out.ckp' not found.
2006-06-28 13:22:45.6742 [normal]: No usable checkpoint found, starting from beginning.
Detected CPU type 1
2006-06-28 14:21:28.7367 [normal]: Search finished successfully.
All of mine have:
2006-06-26 18:03:06.2968 [normal]: Start of BOINC application 'projects/einstein.phys.uwm.edu/einstein_S5R1_4.02_windows_intelx86.exe'.
for the line in bold above.
Cheers
Ray
Try the Pizza@Home project, good crunching.
RE: Sorry if I mis read
)
I don't know where you got this stderr_txt from, but it's not from me!
Here is an overview over my hosts and as you can see, only my Linux box has still contact with the E@H project.
So please, if you come up with such words and advises, give me a link to verify.
cu,
Michael
Ray, The result you're
)
Ray,
The result you're looking at was posted as a random example. It is not from any of Michael's machines. He hasn't turned in an Einstein result since the 26th.
Dig
My error, was thinking it was
)
My error, was thinking it was a link to his, sorry about that.
Too bad there is no way to got the info out to the ones who have not stopped back to the boards. I am sure that many got a patch and have not visited since.
Ray
[EDIT]
Since that belongs to Anonymous there is no way of contacting him (or her).
Try the Pizza@Home project, good crunching.
RE: Ray, The result
)
Yes, I pulled the result from another post here in NC where the user was wondering about the validation failure.
Alinator
RE: Ray, The result
)
My Cereron 433(Linux) feels offended now. ;)
cu,
Michael
RE: RE: Ray, The result
)
Very sorry Michael, thought that was a link to yours, but it is not.
These long ones can really take a long time to run, liked the shorter ones better, but the credit works out the same.
Ray
Try the Pizza@Home project, good crunching.