http://einstein.phys.uwm.edu//host_sched_logs/6660/6660606
2013-09-23 21:09:37.1758 [PID=11917] Request: [USER#xxxxx] [HOST#6660606] [IP xxx.xxx.xxx.252] client 7.0.64
2013-09-23 21:09:37.1862 [PID=11917] [send] effective_ncpus 4 max_jobs_on_host_cpu 999999 max_jobs_on_host 999999
2013-09-23 21:09:37.1862 [PID=11917] [send] effective_ngpus 1 max_jobs_on_host_gpu 999999
2013-09-23 21:09:37.1862 [PID=11917] [send] Not using matchmaker scheduling; Not using EDF sim
2013-09-23 21:09:37.1862 [PID=11917] [send] CPU: req 0.00 sec, 0.00 instances; est delay 0.00
2013-09-23 21:09:37.1863 [PID=11917] [send] Intel GPU: req 1.00 sec, 1.00 instances; est delay 0.00
2013-09-23 21:09:37.1863 [PID=11917] [send] work_req_seconds: 0.00 secs
2013-09-23 21:09:37.1863 [PID=11917] [send] available disk 9.74 GB, work_buf_min 432000
2013-09-23 21:09:37.1863 [PID=11917] [send] active_frac 0.992369 on_frac 0.847424 DCF 1.657400
2013-09-23 21:09:37.1875 [PID=11917] [send] [HOST#6660606] not reliable; max_result_day 2
2013-09-23 21:09:37.1876 [PID=11917] [send] set_trust: random choice for error rate 0.000010: yes
2013-09-23 21:09:37.1876 [PID=11917] [mixed] sending locality work first (0.3807)
There is capable Intel GPU as part of Ivy Bridge device. It's idle (and log confirms that). But 0 secs of work asked for it it seems. Why so? How to fix ?
And another attempt:
9/24/2013 1:19:26 AM | Einstein@Home | update requested by user
9/24/2013 1:19:30 AM | Einstein@Home | [sched_op] Starting scheduler request
9/24/2013 1:19:30 AM | Einstein@Home | Sending scheduler request: Requested by user.
9/24/2013 1:19:30 AM | Einstein@Home | Requesting new tasks for intel_gpu
9/24/2013 1:19:30 AM | Einstein@Home | [sched_op] CPU work request: 0.00 seconds; 0.00 devices
9/24/2013 1:19:30 AM | Einstein@Home | [sched_op] intel_gpu work request: 1.00 seconds; 1.00 devices
9/24/2013 1:19:46 AM | Einstein@Home | Scheduler request completed: got 0 new tasks
9/24/2013 1:19:46 AM | Einstein@Home | [sched_op] Server version 611
9/24/2013 1:19:46 AM | Einstein@Home | No work sent
9/24/2013 1:19:46 AM | Einstein@Home | see scheduler log messages on http://einstein.phys.uwm.edu//host_sched_logs/6660/6660606
9/24/2013 1:19:46 AM | Einstein@Home | Project requested delay of 60 seconds
9/24/2013 1:19:46 AM | Einstein@Home | [sched_op] Deferring communication for 1 min 0 sec
9/24/2013 1:19:46 AM | Einstein@Home | [sched_op] Reason: requested by project
Copyright © 2024 Einstein@Home. All rights reserved.
Not requesting work for Intel GPU - why? Please help.
)
I followed your link to the server logs and found this message:
2013-09-23 21:09:41.4003 [PID=11917] [version] OpenCL device version required min: 102, supplied: 101
Could a driver update fix this or is it hardware dependent?
Thanks. It could be the
)
Thanks. It could be the case.
Device Type: CL_DEVICE_TYPE_GPU
Name: Intel(R) HD Graphics 2500
Vendor: Intel(R) Corporation
Driver version: 8.15.10.2656
Profile: FULL_PROFILE
Version: OpenCL 1.1
Extensions: cl_khr_icd cl_khr_global_int32_base_atomics cl_khr_global_int32_extended_atomics cl_khr_local_int32_base_atomics cl_khr_local_int32_extended_atomics cl_khr_gl_sharing cl_khr_d3d10_sharing cl_intel_dx9_media_sharing cl_khr_3d_image_writes cl_khr_byte_addressable_store
Will try to update driver/SDK.
Now: Device Type:
)
Now:
Device Type: CL_DEVICE_TYPE_GPU
Name: Intel(R) HD Graphics 2500
Vendor: Intel(R) Corporation
Driver version: 9.18.10.3257
Profile: FULL_PROFILE
Version: OpenCL 1.2
Extensions: cl_khr_icd cl_khr_global_int32_base_atomics cl_khr_global_int32_extended_atomics cl_khr_local_int32_base_atomics cl_khr_local_int32_extended_atomics cl_khr_gl_sharing cl_khr_d3d10_sharing cl_intel_dx9_media_sharing cl_khr_3d_image_writes cl_khr_byte_addressable_store cl_khr_gl_event cl_khr_gl_msaa_sharing cl_khr_depth_images cl_khr_gl_depth_images cl_khr_dx9_media_sharing cl_khr_d3d11_sharing cl_khr_image2d_from_buffer
And GPU got task to crunch. Thanks again. Topic closed.
After CUDA GPU install no
)
After CUDA GPU install no intel work fetched again.
My client asks for intel GPU work, but looks like intel_gup plan class not checked by server at all, only CPU, ati and cuda.
Why so and how to fix?
Is it client issue or server setup issue?
http://einstein.phys.uwm.edu//host_sched_logs/6660/6660606
EDIT: hm... looks like server misconfiguration to me. When I enabled ALL work on ALL devices (including CPU) task was sent.
RE: EDIT: hm... looks like
)
The opencl-intel_gpu apps are thrown in with the CPU apps in the BRP (Arecibo) Search, so probably configured as a CPU app, as opposed to an Intel GPU app.
http://einstein.phys.uwm.edu/apps.php
Claggy
These settings work for
)
These settings work for me:
That's with a v7.2 client, of course.
2013-10-26 19:09:10.9321 [PID=2247 ] [send] CPU: req 0.00 sec, 0.00 instances; est delay 0.00
2013-10-26 19:09:10.9321 [PID=2247 ] [send] Intel GPU: req 35.72 sec, 0.00 instances; est delay 0.00
2013-10-26 19:09:10.9321 [PID=2247 ] [send] work_req_seconds: 0.00 secs
...
2013-10-26 19:09:10.9480 [PID=2247 ] [send] [HOST#8864187] Sending app_version 452 einsteinbinary_BRP4 9 134 opencl-intel_gpu; 12.57 GFLOPS
2013-10-26 19:09:10.9495 [PID=2247 ] [send] est. duration for WU 177343315: unscaled 1392.08 scaled 649.48
2013-10-26 19:09:10.9496 [PID=2247 ] [HOST#8864187] Sending [RESULT#407656572 p2030.20130203.G176.03+00.43.C.b1s0g0.00000_2767_0] (est. dur. 649.48 seconds)
And I had GPU enabled (GPU
)
And I had GPU enabled (GPU app) but CPU (CPU app) disabled.
Well, Ok if it's known feature but I would say not obvious feature for project newbie. Maybe worth to make it more clear on properties page.
RE: Maybe worth to make it
)
It seems really odd to me. Looking at the valid tasks page for Richard's host with Intel graphics on it, the Binary Radio Pulsar Search (Arecibo, GPU) selection has no entries, while the Binary Radio Pulsar Search (Arecibo) selection has lots of returned work. Just to add to the noise, the Application column on that page for these tasks includes the string "opencl-intel_gpu".
So in order to get intel GPU work, you must tick the (apparently) non-GPU box if you are not just allowing everything!
I'd venture that will mislead plenty of people.
I'm contemplating a build soon using an i3-3225 (2-core Ivy Bridge including HD 4000) with GTX650. This preference behavior would have tripped me up for sure.
This is what Bernd
)
This is what Bernd Machenschalk said almost two months ago:
http://einsteinathome.org/node/197170&nowrap=true#126858
Claggy
+1 for driver update
)
+1 for driver update