The Last Person to Post Wins #57
16 Apr 2019 23:46:32 UTC
Topic 218669
Welcome to TLPTPW 57!
1. To participate in the game, you must post to the prescribed thread.
2. A post must consist of at least one word.
3. A participant may not have two or more consecutive posts in the thread.
4. The winner of an episode is responsible for organizing the next episode and for choosing the winner of that episode.
5. The winner may be chosen on the basis of the date/time of the post, the number of the post in the thread (50th post; 31415th post; ...), the presence/absence of a particular word/phrase in the post, or any other reason selected by the organizer of the episode. However, the organizer of an episode is prohibited from winning that particular episode.
6. Have fun!
Cheers, Randy!
Seti Classic Final Total: 11446 WU.
Dr Mike didn't tell us which
Dr Mike didn't tell us which birthday that was.
Are you a Leap Frog?
Better hit post enter before hour #7
(I'm not really here}
It's a prime number .....
It's a prime number ..... :-)
Cheers, Mike.
I have made this letter longer than usual because I lack the time to make it shorter ...
... and my other CPU is a Ryzen 5950X :-) Blaise Pascal
Mike Hewson wrote:It's a
So either 43 or 53 then?
mikey wrote:Mike Hewson
Or 47
47 53 59 61 67 71 73 79 83 89
47 53 59 61 67 71 73 79 83 89 97 101 ?
MAGIC Quantum Mechanic
Whoa. This is harder than I thought! I mean, it could be any of them!
Ideas are not fixed, nor should they be; we live in model-dependent reality.
cecht wrote:MAGIC Quantum
Unlikely to be higher than 89, but I would put my money on one of 53/59/61.
Regardless, this has nothing to do with criteria for winning this thread.
Seti Classic Final Total: 11446 WU.
RandyC wrote:cecht
You did say it could be a number, we just combined Dr Mike's birthday with your thoughts. SURE it was a stretch, on both counts, but it's not like someone is going to have any clue what the number is, assuming there is one, at this point.
When I was in Australia last month for the F1 race Dr Mike said he might be able to meet me there, turns out something came up and he wasn't able too but if we had I would have had a much better idea of his age for the numbers being suggested.
Surely at least one of you
Surely at least one of you could have narrowed it right down by just looking at something like this? :-)
Cheers,
Gary.
Gary Roberts wrote:Surely at
135571 is a prime number........never would have guessed he is that old