Binary Radio Pulsar Search (Perseus Arm Survey) "BRP5"

Sunny129
Sunny129
Joined: 5 Dec 05
Posts: 162
Credit: 160342159
RAC: 0

RE: now i'm running 10 WU

Quote:
now i'm running 10 WU at once with 99% gpu load and estimated runtime about 31000 secs (3100 secs per WU)


you're well past the point of diminishing returns...and even if you were able to crunch 10 simultaneous tasks as efficiently as you could 3 or 4, it wouldn't make sense to do so when you know you could maintain the same level of compute efficiency running far fewer simultaneous tasks, and thus using far less GPU memory, and thus consuming considerably less power. there's no point in consuming more power unless its going to increase your PPD.

astrocrab
astrocrab
Joined: 28 Jan 08
Posts: 208
Credit: 429202534
RAC: 0

RE: and even if you were

Quote:
and even if you were able to crunch 10 simultaneous tasks as efficiently as you could 3 or 4

no. with 4 WUs it takes about 3300 sec. per WU and with 10 WUs it takes about 3100 sec. per WU, so efficiency is increased by 6%.
and i did not notice significally increased power consumption.

Sunny129
Sunny129
Joined: 5 Dec 05
Posts: 162
Credit: 160342159
RAC: 0

RE: RE: and even if you

Quote:
Quote:
and even if you were able to crunch 10 simultaneous tasks as efficiently as you could 3 or 4

no. with 4 WUs it takes about 3300 sec. per WU and with 10 WUs it takes about 3100 sec. per WU, so efficiency is increased by 6%.
and i did not notice significally increased power consumption.


i was just using 3 or 4 as an example...there are quite a few whole numbers between 4 and 10...did you try them all to see if you can achieve the same level of efficiency as you do w/ 10 simultaneous tasks?...or to see if you've already passed the point of diminishing returns?...its possible that runtimes might be less than 3100s/WU when running in the range of say 5 to 8 simultaneous tasks. i'm just trying to confirm whether or not you tried them all or just jumped from 4 simultaneous tasks to 10 simultaneous tasks...

astrocrab
astrocrab
Joined: 28 Jan 08
Posts: 208
Credit: 429202534
RAC: 0

yes, of course. 5 WUs: ~3200

yes, of course.
5 WUs: ~3200 sec
8 WUs: ~3130 sec

Bernd Machenschalk
Bernd Machenschalk
Moderator
Administrator
Joined: 15 Oct 04
Posts: 4312
Credit: 250388525
RAC: 34719

We decided to reduce the

We decided to reduce the "bundle size" of BRP5 from 3 to 2, mainly to help people with extremely long run-times (which is pretty bad for a GPU App). This means that the run-time of new BRP5 tasks should be reduced to 2/3 of previous tasks. FpOps and Credit have been adjusted accordingly.

BM

BM

astrocrab
astrocrab
Joined: 28 Jan 08
Posts: 208
Credit: 429202534
RAC: 0

why it is bad for GPU app?

why it is bad for GPU app?

DanNeely
DanNeely
Joined: 4 Sep 05
Posts: 1364
Credit: 3562358667
RAC: 0

RE: why it is bad for GPU

Quote:
why it is bad for GPU app?

People with low end GPUs were having trouble finishing them before the deadline.

Werner
Werner
Joined: 13 Aug 10
Posts: 5
Credit: 8359175
RAC: 0

RE: RE: why it is bad for

Quote:
Quote:
why it is bad for GPU app?

People with low end GPUs were having trouble finishing them before the deadline.

indeed, it is... i would prefer to reduce the workload further by another 50%, otherwise my 6850M is incapable of finishing in time.

Alinator
Alinator
Joined: 8 May 05
Posts: 927
Credit: 9352143
RAC: 0

Hmmmm.... How are you

Hmmmm....

How are you defining low end? I have a couple PCI (not e) GT 430's and they make it no problem.

That's about as low end as you can go nowadays, perhaps 'antique' GPU's would be a better description. ;-)

Sparrow
Sparrow
Joined: 4 Jul 11
Posts: 29
Credit: 10701417
RAC: 0

I have replaced my GTX 560Ti

I have replaced my GTX 560Ti with a GTX 760 now. Unfortunately there are almost no improvements for BRP5 WUs. The run time is about the same :-(

GTX560Ti: 9900 sec
GTX760: 9500 sec
(both with 1 WU at a time)

Comment viewing options

Select your preferred way to display the comments and click "Save settings" to activate your changes.