I would love to see a sky plot (with colors indicating intensity/signal strength) of the results from S5R6. Something pretty to drive home the results of all the crunching. Any project sci? Mods?
Usually a plot like this is included in the formal publication of results, e.g. if you download the offical paper for the S5R5 run, http://arxiv.org/abs/0905.1705, you will find one on page 10.
I would love to see a sky plot (with colors indicating intensity/signal strength) of the results from S5R6. Something pretty to drive home the results of all the crunching. Any project sci? Mods?
Usually a plot like this is included in the formal publication of results, e.g. if you download the officical paper for the S5R5 run, http://arxiv.org/abs/0905.1705, you will find one on page 10.
CU
HBE
Excellent, thanks. Such light reading over the stuff I had to read for grad school. :-P
A few days later, and we're down to ~23000 :) Glad to see statistics haven't failed us yet XD I was wondering - how much analysis can be done on the S5R6 data before the last WUs come in? Percentage-wise, obviously they already have the vast majority of them.
Bernd, how much memory should S5GCE_3.04 nominally use?
I ask as I see here in Windows XP that it uses an, in my opinion, massive 170,224KB RAM with 168,488KB VM per task. It starts to sound like a CPDN model. ;-)
Bernd, how much memory should S5GCE_3.04 nominally use?
I ask as I see here in Windows XP that it uses an, in my opinion, massive 170,224KB RAM with 168,488KB VM per task. It starts to sound like a CPDN model. ;-)
Well, I can tell you that the Linux version uses more memory than either the Arecibo or R6 apps. I have a dual-processor P-III with 512 Meg of memory, that could do two of either of the old-type workunits at a time. With the new S5GCE app, it can only do one at a time. Oh, two will start up, but one always pauses with a "Waiting for Memory" message.
S5GCE allways end with Compute error on both my machines (tasks 170334428, 170524895, 170556252, 170531847, 170451886, 170439512, 170439508). With similar message in kernel log file:
kernel: grsec: (default:D:/) denied load of writable library /SYSV01022003 by /var/lib/boinc/projects/einstein.phys.uwm.edu/einstein_S5GCE_1.04_i686-pc-linux-gnu__S5GCESSE2[einstein_S5GCE_:26521] uid/euid:114/114 gid/egid:1022/1022, parent /usr/bin/boinc_client[boinc_client:11869] uid/euid:114/114 gid/egid:1022/1022
Arecibo tasks finnishing successfully.
Both machines running on grsec patched linux-2.6.33
It's possible compute only Arecibo tasks during problem with S5GCE will be solved?
S5GCE allways end with Compute error on both my machines (tasks 170334428, 170524895, 170556252, 170531847, 170451886, 170439512, 170439508). With similar message in kernel log file:
kernel: grsec: (default:D:/) denied load of writable library /SYSV01022003 by /var/lib/boinc/projects/einstein.phys.uwm.edu/einstein_S5GCE_1.04_i686-pc-linux-gnu__S5GCESSE2[einstein_S5GCE_:26521] uid/euid:114/114 gid/egid:1022/1022, parent /usr/bin/boinc_client[boinc_client:11869] uid/euid:114/114 gid/egid:1022/1022
Arecibo tasks finnishing successfully.
Both machines running on grsec patched linux-2.6.33
It's possible compute only Arecibo tasks during problem with S5GCE will be solved?
Any idea when that's going to be addressed? I'm building a AMD Quad core beast with stats so insane I had to hide the tigerdirect invoice from my wife. Yet its still plugging along in 32 bit mode when it comes to Boinc. Seems like a senseless waste of speed and capacity....
Ok I admit it I'm looking for some justification for buying all this hardware. I live in hope some Cray will have a fatal crash and the sysop will call me in as a backup.
Still the point remains, even my current dual core 64 bit is under performing due to software limitations.
RE: I would love to see a
)
Usually a plot like this is included in the formal publication of results, e.g. if you download the offical paper for the S5R5 run, http://arxiv.org/abs/0905.1705, you will find one on page 10.
CU
HBE
RE: RE: I would love to
)
Excellent, thanks. Such light reading over the stuff I had to read for grad school. :-P
RE: (down from 100000 to
)
A few days later, and we're down to ~23000 :) Glad to see statistics haven't failed us yet XD I was wondering - how much analysis can be done on the S5R6 data before the last WUs come in? Percentage-wise, obviously they already have the vast majority of them.
Bernd, how much memory should
)
Bernd, how much memory should S5GCE_3.04 nominally use?
I ask as I see here in Windows XP that it uses an, in my opinion, massive 170,224KB RAM with 168,488KB VM per task. It starts to sound like a CPDN model. ;-)
RE: Bernd, how much memory
)
Well, I can tell you that the Linux version uses more memory than either the Arecibo or R6 apps. I have a dual-processor P-III with 512 Meg of memory, that could do two of either of the old-type workunits at a time. With the new S5GCE app, it can only do one at a time. Oh, two will start up, but one always pauses with a "Waiting for Memory" message.
S5GCE allways end with
)
S5GCE allways end with Compute error on both my machines (tasks 170334428, 170524895, 170556252, 170531847, 170451886, 170439512, 170439508). With similar message in kernel log file:
kernel: grsec: (default:D:/) denied load of writable library /SYSV01022003 by /var/lib/boinc/projects/einstein.phys.uwm.edu/einstein_S5GCE_1.04_i686-pc-linux-gnu__S5GCESSE2[einstein_S5GCE_:26521] uid/euid:114/114 gid/egid:1022/1022, parent /usr/bin/boinc_client[boinc_client:11869] uid/euid:114/114 gid/egid:1022/1022
Arecibo tasks finnishing successfully.
Both machines running on grsec patched linux-2.6.33
It's possible compute only Arecibo tasks during problem with S5GCE will be solved?
RE: S5GCE allways end with
)
Both machines are x86_64 architecture
RE: Both machines are
)
Einstein doesn't have 64bit applications, so did you load the (ia) 32bit compatibility libraries for your OS? See http://boinc.berkeley.edu/wiki/Installing_BOINC#64_Bit_Considerations for more information.
RE: RE: Both machines are
)
Any idea when that's going to be addressed? I'm building a AMD Quad core beast with stats so insane I had to hide the tigerdirect invoice from my wife. Yet its still plugging along in 32 bit mode when it comes to Boinc. Seems like a senseless waste of speed and capacity....
Ok I admit it I'm looking for some justification for buying all this hardware. I live in hope some Cray will have a fatal crash and the sysop will call me in as a backup.
Still the point remains, even my current dual core 64 bit is under performing due to software limitations.
RE: RE: Both machines are
)
He is successfully doing Arecibo work. ;-)