Finished and validated allright and it SEEMS faster, but I'm too much of a maths newb to figure out how much faster the app really is... can't make much sense of those formulas.
I cant see any 4.35 in the results from your T2060. Something wrong isnt quite right there.
E2140 is based on Core 2, surprising its THAT slow, even with Windows and default app. E2000's are actually quite fast for their clockspeed. Mine is at 2.8GHz (and 0,05v undervolted at the same time), with 4.35 it goes below 18,500 sec. Thats a lot of performance per dollar if you ask me.
E2140 is based on Core 2, surprising its THAT slow, even with Windows and default app. E2000's are actually quite fast for their clockspeed. Mine is at 2.8GHz (and 0,05v undervolted at the same time), with 4.35 it goes below 18,500 sec. Thats a lot of performance per dollar if you ask me.
My E2160 (1.8GHz vs 1.6GHz) Has runtimes in the ~37,000 second range with the SSE optimized app. The advantage that the PIII has is that it's only got a 10-stage pipeline vs something in the 20's for the Core 2 Duo architechture. You've also got to realize that there are two independent cores in the E2140, so with an optimized application, you'd be pushing out twice the WUs of the PIII.
E2140 is based on Core 2, surprising its THAT slow, even with Windows and default app. E2000's are actually quite fast for their clockspeed. Mine is at 2.8GHz (and 0,05v undervolted at the same time), with 4.35 it goes below 18,500 sec. Thats a lot of performance per dollar if you ask me.
My E2160 (1.8GHz vs 1.6GHz) Has runtimes in the ~37,000 second range with the SSE optimized app. The advantage that the PIII has is that it's only got a 10-stage pipeline vs something in the 20's for the Core 2 Duo architechture. You've also got to realize that there are two independent cores in the E2140, so with an optimized application, you'd be pushing out twice the WUs of the PIII.
...why twice the WUs? Bikemans P3s ia a dual-sockel-system. Means also two independent cores.
My last WU was crunched partially (only a small part at the end, though) by 4.35 and it has about the shortest crunch time ever, so I'm really curious what this app will be able to do. Going by the estimates (which should be fairly accurate by now, since this box has had so many S5R3 WUs already- except of course it doesn't fully take into account shorter crunch times with the new app) my first WU done only with 4.35 should be ready in about two hours' time.
RE: Finished and validated
)
I cant see any 4.35 in the results from your T2060. Something wrong isnt quite right there.
Team Philippines
That would be because the
)
That would be because the results were already branded with 4.27. The last two were crunched with 4.35, though.
RE: That would be because
)
All the submitted results are definitely still 4.27 (visible from the stderr.txt output), maybe the 4.35 results are not "reported" yet?
CU
Bikeman
My bad. It WAS 4.27. Somehow
)
My bad. It WAS 4.27. Somehow I must have messed up my app_info.xml *bangs head on desk*
RE: My bad. It WAS 4.27.
)
Don't take it too harsh, I did the same thing on the 4.27 app info.xml from 4.24... didn't realize it for about two weeks. Dur...
RE: My bad. It WAS 4.27.
)
You will know that you have 4.35 installed when you look at the runtimes ;-).
CU
Bikeman
Edit PS: Here's another speed comparison:
Core ("1" :-) ) Duo 1.6 GHz Windows, non-SSE, vs. Dual Pentium III, 1.4 GHz, Linux, SSE optimized 4.35. guess who wins :-)
http://einsteinathome.org/workunit/37166012
RE: Edit PS: Here's another
)
E2140 is based on Core 2, surprising its THAT slow, even with Windows and default app. E2000's are actually quite fast for their clockspeed. Mine is at 2.8GHz (and 0,05v undervolted at the same time), with 4.35 it goes below 18,500 sec. Thats a lot of performance per dollar if you ask me.
Team Philippines
RE: E2140 is based on Core
)
My E2160 (1.8GHz vs 1.6GHz) Has runtimes in the ~37,000 second range with the SSE optimized app. The advantage that the PIII has is that it's only got a 10-stage pipeline vs something in the 20's for the Core 2 Duo architechture. You've also got to realize that there are two independent cores in the E2140, so with an optimized application, you'd be pushing out twice the WUs of the PIII.
RE: RE: E2140 is based on
)
...why twice the WUs? Bikemans P3s ia a dual-sockel-system. Means also two independent cores.
My last WU was crunched
)
My last WU was crunched partially (only a small part at the end, though) by 4.35 and it has about the shortest crunch time ever, so I'm really curious what this app will be able to do. Going by the estimates (which should be fairly accurate by now, since this box has had so many S5R3 WUs already- except of course it doesn't fully take into account shorter crunch times with the new app) my first WU done only with 4.35 should be ready in about two hours' time.