A way to "free" a WU

Jordan Wilberding
Jordan Wilberding
Joined: 19 Feb 05
Posts: 162
Credit: 715454
RAC: 0
Topic 188385

I have several computers, and from time to time, while testing and what not, I run into the problem that I am assigned a work unit, but it has become lost, and in fact will never be computed by my computer.

It might be nice if there was a way, via a web interface, to let einstein know that I am definately not going to be able to do a WU, so it can be freed back into the wild.

such things just should not be writ so please destroy this if you wish to live 'tis better in ignorance to dwell than to go screaming into the abyss worse than hell

Gary Roberts
Gary Roberts
Moderator
Joined: 9 Feb 05
Posts: 5872
Credit: 117571826592
RAC: 35209979

A way to "free" a WU

> It might be nice if there was a way, via a web interface, to let einstein know
> that I am definately not going to be able to do a WU, so it can be freed back
> into the wild.

Good idea. I've got a few of those "Phantoms" where, after a manual "update" you get entries in the results list on the website that don't correspond to work listed in the Boinc GUI. I'd also like to be able to put 'em back into circulation. I thought I saw somewhere that this was supposed to be fixed??

Cheers,
Gary.

John McLeod VII
John McLeod VII
Moderator
Joined: 10 Nov 04
Posts: 547
Credit: 632255
RAC: 0

They will be put back in the

They will be put back in the queue when they expire. The design decision was that there was too much risk to allow users to manually mark results as bad.

Jordan Wilberding
Jordan Wilberding
Joined: 19 Feb 05
Posts: 162
Credit: 715454
RAC: 0

> They will be put back in

Message 7643 in response to message 7642

> They will be put back in the queue when they expire. The design decision was
> that there was too much risk to allow users to manually mark results as bad.

Thanks for the information John!

such things just should not be writ so please destroy this if you wish to live 'tis better in ignorance to dwell than to go screaming into the abyss worse than hell

Gary Roberts
Gary Roberts
Moderator
Joined: 9 Feb 05
Posts: 5872
Credit: 117571826592
RAC: 35209979

> They will be put back in

Message 7644 in response to message 7642

> They will be put back in the queue when they expire. The design decision was
> that there was too much risk to allow users to manually mark results as bad.

Perfectly understandable decision. Maybe in a future release it might be possible to allow the server to "notice" these "out of character" results and in a client/server communication, ask the client if the client actually has the work or not. Perhaps the server could then send a "replacement" if the data had really gone missing.

Anyway, thanks for your reply.

Cheers,
Gary.

Comment viewing options

Select your preferred way to display the comments and click "Save settings" to activate your changes.