J18/01/2007 14:02:27|Einstein@Home|Message from server: Server can't open database
Yep, still a bit rough road.
The latest performance issues were due to all validators running at full load to check the results that managed to come in now...
BM
First I'd like to say: good job EAH !
And it seems the validators are still busy, on connecting my 2 EAH hosts they reported several 10s of results and all of them are still in the initial state. Yes, even the ones that have reached quorum.
Not a problem, I expect this will resolve itself in the coming days as the last "1"'s are reported in and the uploads of the "I" files are decreasing to normal levels. Hope the very busy server holds, though...
Thank you Bernd, for the update! :-)
Three cheers for all the hardworking E@H workers!
May you all sleep safe, sound and dry.
Quote:
[aside]
Always a worry, depending upon the font and personal acuity:
1 and I, O and 0, S and 5, E and 3, g and 9, A and 4, B and 8, 2 and Z, b and 6.
[/aside]
Cheers, Mike.
I have made this letter longer than usual because I lack the time to make it shorter ...
... and my other CPU is a Ryzen 5950X :-) Blaise Pascal
Validate errors are server-side; AFAICT they occur when the validator can’t find the results it’s supposed to be comparing. There have been quite a few of them at S@h recently, associated with the server problems over there; likewise I would guess yours to have something to do with the server problems here.
It looks like a wrong version of the validator had been installed.
The one responsible for this had been found and shot. Now there's no way to fix it anymore.
Seriously: Bruce will be the first awake with the permissions to fix it, so this should be cured tomorrow morning (CET). All results that have been marked "validate error" should be validated again, probably there's nothing wrong with them.
Sorry for the inconvenience, we're all a bit short on sleep.
Yep, that was my best guess,
)
Yep, that was my best guess, too.
RE: RE: J18/01/2007
)
First I'd like to say: good job EAH !
And it seems the validators are still busy, on connecting my 2 EAH hosts they reported several 10s of results and all of them are still in the initial state. Yes, even the ones that have reached quorum.
Not a problem, I expect this will resolve itself in the coming days as the last "1"'s are reported in and the uploads of the "I" files are decreasing to normal levels. Hope the very busy server holds, though...
Make tea, not coffee !
Returned my first
)
Returned my first S5RI
26358042
Looking good, the partnered has not sent theirs back, so waiting to see validation.
returned my first
)
returned my first S5R1
26334359
Looking BAD! INVALID? WHY?
Thank you Bernd, for the
)
Thank you Bernd, for the update! :-)
Three cheers for all the hardworking E@H workers!
May you all sleep safe, sound and dry.
Cheers, Mike.
I have made this letter longer than usual because I lack the time to make it shorter ...
... and my other CPU is a Ryzen 5950X :-) Blaise Pascal
RE: returned my first
)
I believe you mean "first S5RI"
Don't get distracted by shiny objects.
RE: returned my first
)
Validate errors are server-side; AFAICT they occur when the validator can’t find the results it’s supposed to be comparing. There have been quite a few of them at S@h recently, associated with the server problems over there; likewise I would guess yours to have something to do with the server problems here.
It looks like a wrong version
)
It looks like a wrong version of the validator had been installed.
The one responsible for this had been found and shot. Now there's no way to fix it anymore.
Seriously: Bruce will be the first awake with the permissions to fix it, so this should be cured tomorrow morning (CET). All results that have been marked "validate error" should be validated again, probably there's nothing wrong with them.
Sorry for the inconvenience, we're all a bit short on sleep.
BM
BM
Still up and working... must
)
Still up and working... must be really extreme over there. I hope our fellow crunchers will at least show patience ;-)
RE: It looks like a wrong
)
I was wondering why my Einstein units were giving me Rosetta credit :\\
:)