rather congrat everyone who has done more posts than myself!
Your posts gathered quite a bit of time before others posted and disrupted your time earned. I scored you at 44, 32, and 53 for 129 pts. total. You have got me thinking of some type of point scheme for volume of posts. Hmmmm... any suggestions anyone?
BTW: Chipper Q has sent me the macros and information for scoring future WL : SEs.
I'm going to check it out and make sure I've got handle on it. Hopefully within the next couple of days I'll start another game without a short time/post requirement.
You have got me thinking of some type of point scheme for volume of posts. Hmmmm... any suggestions anyone?
Sounds like a good idea. How about awarding a point per post? Or 2 points per post? Half a point? Something like that?
I was thinking along those lines. If I had awarded points per post along with the time scores then I believe Dan Wulff would've won the game. He was the most prolific poster with really close post scores to Vanessa.
CLOSED! CLOSED!
)
CLOSED! CLOSED! CLOSED!
Ok, this one was rather short. I should be able to get the scores put together much quicker. Will post ASAP. Thanks for playing!
1. Vanessa - 129 pts. 2. Dan
)
1. Vanessa - 129 pts.
2. Dan Wulff - 125 pts.
3. Chipper Q - 120 pts.
4. Dan (Burr) Michel - 114 pts.
5. Chuck Reynolds - 103 pts.
6. Rod - 71 pts.
7. gravitonring - 63 pts.
8. Pooh Bear 27 - 50 pts.
9. Steve K - 30 pts.
10. Sammie - 26 pts.
11. Doc - 15 pts.
12. marvinvwinkle - 10 pts.
13. Trog Dog - 2 pts.
Congratulations Vanessa!
my glass is half wulff
)
my glass is half wulff
everything is true, the opposite of everything is also true
wow, how is that with only
)
wow, how is that with only three posts?
rather congrat everyone who has done more posts than myself!
RE: wow, how is that with
)
Your posts gathered quite a bit of time before others posted and disrupted your time earned. I scored you at 44, 32, and 53 for 129 pts. total. You have got me thinking of some type of point scheme for volume of posts. Hmmmm... any suggestions anyone?
BTW: Chipper Q has sent me the macros and information for scoring future WL : SEs.
I'm going to check it out and make sure I've got handle on it. Hopefully within the next couple of days I'll start another game without a short time/post requirement.
RE: You have got me
)
Sounds like a good idea. How about awarding a point per post? Or 2 points per post? Half a point? Something like that?
RE: RE: You have got me
)
I was thinking along those lines. If I had awarded points per post along with the time scores then I believe Dan Wulff would've won the game. He was the most prolific poster with really close post scores to Vanessa.