I have updated all E@H webpages to the current BOINC versions.
If you find some pages that are not working please report it here.
If you prefer the way the old webpages worked you can report that here as well, but keep in mind that all the changes that were made come from BOINC and not E@H.
I’m surprised they issued it in this condition, what with the broken suppress-old-messages-in-long-threads preference and other bugs that have been noted on the S@h message boards. For dial-up users, the Milestones thread in NC must now be the sort of page you click on before supper and see if it’s finished downloading by the time you’ve eaten …
oh boy.. well. i can answer that one. basicly over on seti you have folks from classic and folks that never ran it.. well for a time anytime some one from classic posted, no matter how inocent. the folks that disliked them would - the post. and use other accounts to do the same, eventualy there post vanishd as it was then filterd.
the same happend to anyone that made any sort of negative comment about ucb. afterall, ucb never dose anything wrong..
in otherwords. people could make a new account, crunch one wu, and create dozens of said accounts and use them to - people that they didnt like and + people they did like.. thus abuse.
Quote:
but without a little description I think that cautious people would be afraid to use it at all, and curious people will just push it to see that what happened wasn't what they expected
agreed, it should have been something like,,,
X - click this to report abuse
or
X - click this to report a rules violation
would have been much much more descriptive :)
Quote:
the Milestones thread in NC must now be the sort of page you click on before supper and see if it’s finished downloading by the time you’ve eaten …
haha, same if your on semi slow "broadband"
hmm, shame they didnt just use phpbb with a "boinc" module/add on... wonder if im the only one that tholt of that? probably a good reasen it hasnt been done.
seeing without seeing is something the blind learn to do, and seeing beyond vision can be a gift.
User with id FORUM_MODERATION_EMAIL_USER_ID created but nothing returned from DB layer
###
Using the red X and fill the textfield for a comment, I get this after hitting the OK-button.
I guess no moderators are noticed.
PS:
Any progress in the to little fontsize-thingsy? ;)
I reported the "red X" problem to boinc_dev. This is serious so I hope we will have it fixed soon.
I increased the fontsize a little bit just now but I may need to go further. I also requested the boinc default is increased so I will see what others think.
I reported the "red X" problem to boinc_dev. This is serious so I hope we will have it fixed soon.
I increased the fontsize a little bit just now but I may need to go further. I also requested the boinc default is increased so I will see what others think.
RE: I have updated all E@H
)
I’m surprised they issued it in this condition, what with the broken suppress-old-messages-in-long-threads preference and other bugs that have been noted on the S@h message boards. For dial-up users, the Milestones thread in NC must now be the sort of page you click on before supper and see if it’s finished downloading by the time you’ve eaten …
RE: I wonder how the rating
)
oh boy.. well. i can answer that one. basicly over on seti you have folks from classic and folks that never ran it.. well for a time anytime some one from classic posted, no matter how inocent. the folks that disliked them would - the post. and use other accounts to do the same, eventualy there post vanishd as it was then filterd.
the same happend to anyone that made any sort of negative comment about ucb. afterall, ucb never dose anything wrong..
in otherwords. people could make a new account, crunch one wu, and create dozens of said accounts and use them to - people that they didnt like and + people they did like.. thus abuse.
agreed, it should have been something like,,,
X - click this to report abuse
or
X - click this to report a rules violation
would have been much much more descriptive :)
haha, same if your on semi slow "broadband"
hmm, shame they didnt just use phpbb with a "boinc" module/add on... wonder if im the only one that tholt of that? probably a good reasen it hasnt been done.
seeing without seeing is something the blind learn to do, and seeing beyond vision can be a gift.
Another problem with the
)
Another problem with the little red X:
###
Unable to handle request
User with id FORUM_MODERATION_EMAIL_USER_ID created but nothing returned from DB layer
###
Using the red X and fill the textfield for a comment, I get this after hitting the OK-button.
I guess no moderators are noticed.
PS:
Any progress in the to little fontsize-thingsy? ;)
RE: Another problem with
)
I reported the "red X" problem to boinc_dev. This is serious so I hope we will have it fixed soon.
I increased the fontsize a little bit just now but I may need to go further. I also requested the boinc default is increased so I will see what others think.
RE: I reported the "red X"
)
Thanks, now the size looks normal again.
See here. I think this is
)
See here. I think this is also related to the new web code.
BM
BM