// DBOINCP-300: added node comment count condition in order to get Preview working ?>
[B^S] Spydermb
Joined: 28 Feb 05
Posts: 15
Credit: 2161372
RAC: 0
30 Apr 2006 22:11:00 UTC
Topic 191149
(moderation:
)
I added a new puter to Einstein, but all my downloads in my results for computer (620242) show client error, but once the wu is finished and upload it show Success and done, what s up with that?
Hi Martin,
I'm not too sure about host #620242. You might try going back to core client 5.2.13 or better yet use truXoft Calibrating BOINC Core Client.
You also seem to have a problem with host #310483. I believe you should be using Akosf's S40.12 instead of D41.12 which is optimized for AMD processors.
Hi Martin,
I'm not too sure about host #620242. You might try going back to core client 5.2.13 or better yet use truXoft Calibrating BOINC Core Client.
You also seem to have a problem with host #310483. I believe you should be using Akosf's S40.12 instead of D41.12 which is optimized for AMD processors.
TTYL
Richard
Thanks Richard, I was Alpha Testing Boinc 5.4.7, supposed to be public soon, I send this bug to alpha, I forgot i was alpha testing BOINC, dugh.. LOL, I saw this problem with host 310483, i went back to c37, is S40.12 better for this host?
Results for Computer show client error
)
Hi Martin,
I'm not too sure about host #620242. You might try going back to core client 5.2.13 or better yet use truXoft Calibrating BOINC Core Client.
You also seem to have a problem with host #310483. I believe you should be using Akosf's S40.12 instead of D41.12 which is optimized for AMD processors.
TTYL
Richard
RE: Hi Martin, I'm not too
)
Thanks Richard, I was Alpha Testing Boinc 5.4.7, supposed to be public soon, I send this bug to alpha, I forgot i was alpha testing BOINC, dugh.. LOL, I saw this problem with host 310483, i went back to c37, is S40.12 better for this host?
S40.12 would be faster than
)
S40.12 would be faster than C37.
RE: S40.12 would be faster
)
Cool, Thanks!