I´m going to test this optimized version on this: Opteron 144@2,2GHz@DFI nForce IV ultra infinity, 1024 MB RAM@400MHz@dualchannel. Now, a time for one "normal" wu is about 4,350 seconds. Just wait and you will know it too...
I´m going to test this optimized version on this: Opteron 144@2,2GHz@DFI nForce IV ultra infinity, 1024 MB RAM@400MHz@dualchannel. Now, a time for one "short" wu is about 4,350 seconds and for the "normal" about 15,450. Just wait and you will know it too...[
I´m going to test this optimized version on this: Opteron 144@2,2GHz@DFI nForce IV ultra infinity, 1024 MB RAM@400MHz@dualchannel. Now, a time for one "short" wu is about 4,350 seconds and for the "normal" about 15,450. Just wait and you will know it too...[
ECS K7sem Mainbord
on-board AMD Duron 892MHz CPU (8.5 x 105) Codename:Spitfire, Athlon lite
on-board Graphics
VIA chip set
256MB SDRAM PC133 (Kingstone)
OS: Win98SE
Boinc app. ver.4.19
Standard average performance 40,324.00 sec.
Average performance with A38724,943.14 sec.
Average performance with A3615,122.16 sec.
Units validated with both clients
Cheap configuration with great output thanks to Akosf.
If you cant upgrade the CPU call Akosf :-)
With respect
Screbilde
"The FUTURE is only a PARTICLE away from the PRESENT and the PAST."
I´m going to test this optimized version on this: Opteron 144@2,2GHz@DFI nForce IV ultra infinity, 1024 MB RAM@400MHz@dualchannel. Now, a time for one "short" wu is about 4,350 seconds and for the "normal" about 15,450. Just wait and you will know it too...[
Puts new life back in these old cpu's and will save me both time and money.
Erm, no. Related just to credit, the new boostapp will do nothing. The only one who's getting use out of it is the project itself and science intended crunchers (like me) ;-). AFAIK simply because your credit is just referred to your crunching speed (FLOPS/IOPS) and time (crunching 10k seconds on 2 wus instead of 1 does't change the total time spent for the project, it just cuts the credit in half per wu).
Quote:
I can do more work, in less time, on the same hardware, for the same cost!
Puts new life back in these old cpu's and will save me both time and money.
Erm, no. Related just to credit, the new boostapp will do nothing. The only one who's getting use out of it is the project itself and science intended crunchers (like me) ;-). AFAIK simply because your credit is just referred to your crunching speed (FLOPS/IOPS) and time (crunching 10k seconds on 2 wus instead of 1 does't change the total time spent for the project, it just cuts the credit in half per wu).
Quote:
I can do more work, in less time, on the same hardware, for the same cost!
Yes, more work units are done :-)
Did I say anything about credit? It saves time because it does more WU's in the same amount of time and I don't have to think about upgrading the systems. That's pretty simple isn't it?
I´m going to test this
)
I´m going to test this optimized version on this: Opteron 144@2,2GHz@DFI nForce IV ultra infinity, 1024 MB RAM@400MHz@dualchannel. Now, a time for one "normal" wu is about 4,350 seconds. Just wait and you will know it too...
First result in for
)
First result in for K6-2/500:
28:59:10, Not too shabby for a slug.
WOW, previous run times with Albert were in the 55-60 hr ballpark.
VERY Sweet!
Alinator
I´m going to test this
)
I´m going to test this optimized version on this: Opteron 144@2,2GHz@DFI nForce IV ultra infinity, 1024 MB RAM@400MHz@dualchannel. Now, a time for one "short" wu is about 4,350 seconds and for the "normal" about 15,450. Just wait and you will know it too...[
RE: I´m going to test this
)
First "short" WU - 1,907.97seconds.
This is all quite amazing!
)
This is all quite amazing!
May I propose a hearty round of applause to akosf?
for( int i = 1; i < SOME_BIG_NUMBER; ++i ) { Clap(); Grin(); Print( 'This guy rocks!' ); ++kudos; }Cheers, Mike. :-)
I have made this letter longer than usual because I lack the time to make it shorter ...
... and my other CPU is a Ryzen 5950X :-) Blaise Pascal
ECS K7sem Mainbord on-board
)
ECS K7sem Mainbord
on-board AMD Duron 892MHz CPU (8.5 x 105) Codename:Spitfire, Athlon lite
on-board Graphics
VIA chip set
256MB SDRAM PC133 (Kingstone)
OS: Win98SE
Boinc app. ver.4.19
Standard average performance 40,324.00 sec.
Average performance with A387 24,943.14 sec.
Average performance with A36 15,122.16 sec.
Units validated with both clients
Cheap configuration with great output thanks to Akosf.
If you cant upgrade the CPU call Akosf :-)
With respect
Screbilde
"The FUTURE is only a PARTICLE away from the PRESENT and the PAST."
Just ran 2 on my p4 3.2ghz
)
Just ran 2 on my p4 3.2ghz with 512mb ram
time..taken---------claimed credit
8,198.38-------------17.82
8,049.83--------------17.50
RE: I´m going to test this
)
"normal" is about 6,600seconds. Great job!
RE: Puts new life back in
)
Erm, no. Related just to credit, the new boostapp will do nothing. The only one who's getting use out of it is the project itself and science intended crunchers (like me) ;-). AFAIK simply because your credit is just referred to your crunching speed (FLOPS/IOPS) and time (crunching 10k seconds on 2 wus instead of 1 does't change the total time spent for the project, it just cuts the credit in half per wu).
Yes, more work units are done :-)
Greetings, Santas little helper
RE: RE: Puts new life
)
Did I say anything about credit? It saves time because it does more WU's in the same amount of time and I don't have to think about upgrading the systems. That's pretty simple isn't it?