New Improved Gravational Wave App - Discussion

Tom M
Tom M
Joined: 2 Feb 06
Posts: 6450
Credit: 9577293188
RAC: 7811642

I would be interested in a

I would be interested in a census of how many All-Sky GPU tasks are each of us currently running per GPU?

I am running 3x.

I am trying to see if anyone is getting significantly better total production at 4x, 5x, 6x?

Respectfully,

A Proud member of the O.F.A.  (Old Farts Association).  Be well, do good work, and keep in touch.® (Garrison Keillor)  I want some more patience. RIGHT NOW!

Gandolph1
Gandolph1
Joined: 20 Feb 05
Posts: 180
Credit: 389647764
RAC: 943

Tom M wrote: I would be

Tom M wrote:

I would be interested in a census of how many All-Sky GPU tasks are each of us currently running per GPU?

I am running 3x.

I am trying to see if anyone is getting significantly better total production at 4x, 5x, 6x?

Respectfully,

I'm running 3x on a 2080ti and 4x on my 3080ti,  I could probably increase my throughput a little if I had the time to mess with it more, but my Threadripper CPU is not ideal for these type of tasks and really both of my systems are too old to spend much time on them.  It also doesn't help that I don't let them run 24/7 so trying to figure out actual throughput can be challenging.

 

 

 

Tom M
Tom M
Joined: 2 Feb 06
Posts: 6450
Credit: 9577293188
RAC: 7811642

Gandolph1 wrote: Tom M

Gandolph1 wrote:

Tom M wrote:

I would be interested in a census of how many All-Sky GPU tasks are each of us currently running per GPU?

I am running 3x.

I am trying to see if anyone is getting significantly better total production at 4x, 5x, 6x?

Respectfully,

I'm running 3x on a 2080ti and 4x on my 3080ti,  I could probably increase my throughput a little if I had the time to mess with it more, but my Threadripper CPU is not ideal for these type of tasks and really both of my systems are too old to spend much time on them.  It also doesn't help that I don't let them run 24/7 so trying to figure out actual throughput can be challenging.

 

 

By calculation using the slowest pending task it looks like you could possibly do 3.8M. Which would be very robust!

Tom M

A Proud member of the O.F.A.  (Old Farts Association).  Be well, do good work, and keep in touch.® (Garrison Keillor)  I want some more patience. RIGHT NOW!

Gandolph1
Gandolph1
Joined: 20 Feb 05
Posts: 180
Credit: 389647764
RAC: 943

Tom M wrote: Gandolph1

Tom M wrote:

Gandolph1 wrote:

Tom M wrote:

I would be interested in a census of how many All-Sky GPU tasks are each of us currently running per GPU?

I am running 3x.

I am trying to see if anyone is getting significantly better total production at 4x, 5x, 6x?

Respectfully,

I'm running 3x on a 2080ti and 4x on my 3080ti,  I could probably increase my throughput a little if I had the time to mess with it more, but my Threadripper CPU is not ideal for these type of tasks and really both of my systems are too old to spend much time on them.  It also doesn't help that I don't let them run 24/7 so trying to figure out actual throughput can be challenging.

 

 

By calculation using the slowest pending task it looks like you could possibly do 3.8M. Which would be very robust!

Tom M

Probably, but I'd need a separate power feed from FPL to run this Threadripper!  (In fact I'm looking to sell the Threadripper and build new.  It soaks too much power and generates too much heat for Florida.) 

 

Tom M
Tom M
Joined: 2 Feb 06
Posts: 6450
Credit: 9577293188
RAC: 7811642

Steven, Your welcome

Steven,

Your welcome here.  My Windows 5700G box is here.

Respectfully,

A Proud member of the O.F.A.  (Old Farts Association).  Be well, do good work, and keep in touch.® (Garrison Keillor)  I want some more patience. RIGHT NOW!

Tom M
Tom M
Joined: 2 Feb 06
Posts: 6450
Credit: 9577293188
RAC: 7811642

Out of the Top 50 about 21

Out of the Top 50 about 21 are running or have run an All-Sky GW task.

#2 Valterc (just a few)
#7 Douglas
#10 Anonymous
#11 Douglas
#15 Toby Broom
#16 Anonymous (Radeon VII's)
#20 San-Ferando Valley
#21 WPrion
#22 Wedge008 (one task)
#24 Weber462
#28 Anonmous
#31 DF1DX
#32 Stefan Ledwina
#33 GWGeorge007
#40 aaronvr
#43 zooxit
#45 Anonymous
#46 bibi
#47 john
#48 zooxit
#50 San-Fernando-Valley

 

A Proud member of the O.F.A.  (Old Farts Association).  Be well, do good work, and keep in touch.® (Garrison Keillor)  I want some more patience. RIGHT NOW!

mikey
mikey
Joined: 22 Jan 05
Posts: 12684
Credit: 1839092349
RAC: 3820

Gandolph1 wrote: Tom M

Gandolph1 wrote:

Tom M wrote:

Gandolph1 wrote:

Tom M wrote:

I would be interested in a census of how many All-Sky GPU tasks are each of us currently running per GPU?

I am running 3x.

I am trying to see if anyone is getting significantly better total production at 4x, 5x, 6x?

Respectfully,

I'm running 3x on a 2080ti and 4x on my 3080ti,  I could probably increase my throughput a little if I had the time to mess with it more, but my Threadripper CPU is not ideal for these type of tasks and really both of my systems are too old to spend much time on them.  It also doesn't help that I don't let them run 24/7 so trying to figure out actual throughput can be challenging.

 

 

By calculation using the slowest pending task it looks like you could possibly do 3.8M. Which would be very robust!

Tom M

Probably, but I'd need a separate power feed from FPL to run this Threadripper!  (In fact I'm looking to sell the Threadripper and build new.  It soaks too much power and generates too much heat for Florida.) 

Post a link to what you are selling here if you can please you never know who will think that's an upgrade for them.

GWGeorge007
GWGeorge007
Joined: 8 Jan 18
Posts: 3062
Credit: 4968267686
RAC: 1415368

mikey wrote: Gandolph1

mikey wrote:

Gandolph1 wrote:

I'm running 3x on a 2080ti and 4x on my 3080ti,  I could probably increase my throughput a little if I had the time to mess with it more, but my Threadripper CPU is not ideal for these type of tasks and really both of my systems are too old to spend much time on them.  It also doesn't help that I don't let them run 24/7 so trying to figure out actual throughput can be challenging.

(In fact I'm looking to sell the Threadripper and build new.  It soaks too much power and generates too much heat for Florida.) 

Post a link to what you are selling here if you can please you never know who will think that's an upgrade for them.

You can also post it on discord for 'BOINCNetwork':   https://discord.gg/UXsgc8Ss   It is free to join, plus you might get some good tips or help with your new build.

George

Proud member of the Old Farts Association

Tom M
Tom M
Joined: 2 Feb 06
Posts: 6450
Credit: 9577293188
RAC: 7811642

So far I have had no Invalids

So far I have had no Invalids or computation errors when I upped my evga rtx 3080 ti to 4x.

There appears to be a net gain in total production.  User dedicated memory is at ~79%.

I am running the system here.

Assuming that gain is a reliable gain then the question will be if I can shoehorn it up to 5x and get another reliable gain.

Tom M

A Proud member of the O.F.A.  (Old Farts Association).  Be well, do good work, and keep in touch.® (Garrison Keillor)  I want some more patience. RIGHT NOW!

Weber462
Weber462
Joined: 11 May 22
Posts: 37
Credit: 3329903120
RAC: 1279211

When i ran 5x on my rdna 2

When i ran 5x on my rdna 2 cards i ran into reboots.  I dont know if it is a coincidence or not.  Went down to 4x and runs great.

Comment viewing options

Select your preferred way to display the comments and click "Save settings" to activate your changes.