Seti Refuge Bar & Bistro Wing of Cafe Einstein

GWGeorge007
GWGeorge007
Joined: 8 Jan 18
Posts: 3060
Credit: 4956014353
RAC: 1306439

Tom M wrote: GWGeorge007

Tom M wrote:

GWGeorge007 wrote:

Well...  I'm not ready to pass judgement just yet...  I usually wait until the mid-season point.

George,

Since the Chicago Bears were not playing on Sunday, who did you watch instead?

Tom M

I watched Detroit beat Carolina, Kansas City beat Minnesota, and San Francisco beat Dallas.

Tonight I'm going to watch Green Bay loose to Las Vegas.

Does that answer your question?

George

Proud member of the Old Farts Association

Tom M
Tom M
Joined: 2 Feb 06
Posts: 6420
Credit: 9551723540
RAC: 13325445

GWGeorge007 wrote: Does that

GWGeorge007 wrote:

Does that answer your question?

Yes, it does.  I knew you watched Pro FB.  I knew you were a die-hard Bears Fan.  So the question was who else were you going to watch when the Bears are not playing on Sunday?  And you answered "A lot of teams" :)

Tom M

 

A Proud member of the O.F.A.  (Old Farts Association).  Be well, do good work, and keep in touch.® (Garrison Keillor)  I want some more patience. RIGHT NOW!

GWGeorge007
GWGeorge007
Joined: 8 Jan 18
Posts: 3060
Credit: 4956014353
RAC: 1306439

Tom M wrote: GWGeorge007

Tom M wrote:

GWGeorge007 wrote:

Does that answer your question?

Yes, it does.  I knew you watched Pro FB.  I knew you were a die-hard Bears Fan.  So the question was who else were you going to watch when the Bears are not playing on Sunday?  And you answered "A lot of teams" :)

I tend to watch Pro FB anytime I get a chance, which is almost always.  Specifically (after the Chicago Bears), I'll watch the north NFC division's teams, then the other Pro teams which are doing very well when they're available on cable TV.

My next favorite sport to watch is Pro NBA, and yes, specifically the Chicago Bulls.  Love watching the game, but have never played in any organized game or league in my life.

I don't watch much baseball at all, the game itself makes me fall asleep.  Soccer has been becoming a bigger sport in the U.S. and I realize that it is a World Wide favorite sport.  I can't quite get into watching it anywhere near as much as football or basketball though I will watch it a bit more than baseball.

I do love what used to be called 'open wheel' racing like Formula1 and Indy Cars.  Road racing is my preferred favorite, and a few oval tracks like the Super Speedways of Daytona, Texas, Michigan & Talledaga, which obviously includes NASCAR events.  I'm not a big fan of NASCAR, but I will watch some of the races if nothing else is on.

College sports such as football and basketball are okay, but I can't get into every game as much as some people do until the playoffs.  Then I'll be looking for the soon-to-be a pro player in the drafts.

Am I a 'couch potato'?  Not specifically, but I'm becoming one since I don't get around anywhere near as much as I used to at nearly 70 years young.

George

Proud member of the Old Farts Association

Tom M
Tom M
Joined: 2 Feb 06
Posts: 6420
Credit: 9551723540
RAC: 13325445

https://hackaday.com/2023/10/

https://hackaday.com/2023/10/10/jennys-daily-drivers-serenityos-and-in-particular-ladybird/

Ladybird is a new Linux browser. It is NOT beta ready. But read the review.

A Proud member of the O.F.A.  (Old Farts Association).  Be well, do good work, and keep in touch.® (Garrison Keillor)  I want some more patience. RIGHT NOW!

Mike Hewson
Mike Hewson
Moderator
Joined: 1 Dec 05
Posts: 6588
Credit: 313006200
RAC: 193470

Sad Panda*. I put $100 AUD (

Sad Panda*. I put $100 AUD ( at 12 to 1 !! ) on the recent Bathurst 1000 motor race and made the correct prediction of who would have been the winner, however this was scuppered by a bizarre & little known rule change ( see here ). As I've been taking quite a bit of money off Ladbrokes consistently over the years for this event, but not so this year, then I'm not a happy camper. 

During a safety car period one can't overtake another vehicle ( without authorisation ) as it is a full course yellow. But if a car has ducked into the pits ( as is legal under safety car periods ) then there will be re-join with the field of cars on exit from the pits. Seems simple, right ? Not so, as it is legally possible for a re-joining car to overtake cars for a short distance from the pit exit to a nominated line across the track. It's an approximately 100m opportunity for the exiting car ( while "getting up to speed" ) to pass those cars already passing by in single file and then blending in with the field. However if it reaches the said line just in front of another car in the existing queue, but does not blend ahead of the other car, it is deemed that this other car has overtaken the one coming from the pits! A non-redressable penalty is applied. It's a pit lane drive through at the earliest convenience under restoration of green flag conditions that is required, losing at least 30 seconds with respect to the field.

It's bizarre because a pass under yellow flag conditions creates a penalty that is applied to another car which has not changed direction or speed! Hence this favours pitting cars over the ones that stay out and circulate, plus now that everyone knows this rule has changed it will be gamed and force penalties on unsuspecting teams. Actually it is doubly bizarre as it will force cars already on the track to give way to cars exiting the pits. Traditionally the onus has been upon the pit-exiting car to not impede those passing by : with the worst case being a re-join at the tail of the field. It's little known because this novel sub clause in the rules was not widely announced and most teams had not received any notification ( official or otherwise ) of it. My selection** for a win lost ( relative to the winner ) by a time rather less than that penalty. 

No Cheers, Mike.

* Rant alert!

** Dave Reynolds and Garth Tander in car 26, the most experienced pair of drivers in the field and both prior winners. They are experts in car setup for the changing conditions.

( edit ) FWIW here are my rules for betting ( which can be a rational activity ) :

- NEVER bet more than you can afford to lose and in practice ONLY a fraction of that.

- bet infrequently so that it DOES NOT become habitual.

- NEVER bet in order to redress a loss. Walk away.

- ONLY bet when you know something that the bookie doesn't ( relevant information can be monetised ).

- NEVER bet if the odds are too short, in particular if the return is less than the stake.

- GIVEN that the above are true then PREFER to bet when the bookie is/appears-to-be running a 'Dutch Book' ie. is setting odds in response to the betting outlays of punters rather than real world chances of outcomes.

I have made this letter longer than usual because I lack the time to make it shorter ...

... and my other CPU is a Ryzen 5950X :-) Blaise Pascal

Tom M
Tom M
Joined: 2 Feb 06
Posts: 6420
Credit: 9551723540
RAC: 13325445

Tom M wrote: George, I see

Tom M wrote:

George,

I see the Bears have a winning streak!

Tom M

Darn. One game winning streak.

I was reading the Wikipedia history of the Chicago Bears.

They popularized the wing T offense. It apparently confused the heck out of opponents at first.

Until someone figured out the weakness they had an incredibly dominant defense.

I would rather lose a close game than lose a blow out.

 

 

A Proud member of the O.F.A.  (Old Farts Association).  Be well, do good work, and keep in touch.® (Garrison Keillor)  I want some more patience. RIGHT NOW!

GWGeorge007
GWGeorge007
Joined: 8 Jan 18
Posts: 3060
Credit: 4956014353
RAC: 1306439

Tom M wrote:Darn. One game

Tom M wrote:

Darn. One game winning streak.

I was reading the Wikipedia history of the Chicago Bears.

They popularized the wing T offense. It apparently confused the heck out of opponents at first.

Until someone figured out the weakness they had an incredibly dominant defense.

I would rather lose a close game than lose a blow out.

I agree, so would I. 

But if it's a blow out, that just means the coaches need to emphasize what they teach (supposedly) better.

...or get new coaches...!

...and I think they're going to get new coaches very soon...!

.....[EDIT].....

Oh... the days of a fiery Mike Ditka and Buddy Ryan!  I wish they were back!

George

Proud member of the Old Farts Association

Tom M
Tom M
Joined: 2 Feb 06
Posts: 6420
Credit: 9551723540
RAC: 13325445

GWGeorge007 wrote: Oh... the

GWGeorge007 wrote:

Oh... the days of a fiery Mike Ditka and Buddy Ryan!  I wish they were back!

https://www.nbcsportschicago.com/nfl/chicago-bears/bears-news/what-if-tyson-bagent-didnt-get-his-nfl-shot-heres-his-backup-plan/513617/

A Proud member of the O.F.A.  (Old Farts Association).  Be well, do good work, and keep in touch.® (Garrison Keillor)  I want some more patience. RIGHT NOW!

Jinkei
Jinkei
Joined: 28 Aug 10
Posts: 348
Credit: 285659803
RAC: 320835

I realize it's a

I realize it's a bit self-congratulatory, but I reached 100 million yesterday! Here's to all the diligent number crunchers out there!

E pluribus unum

GWGeorge007
GWGeorge007
Joined: 8 Jan 18
Posts: 3060
Credit: 4956014353
RAC: 1306439

Jinkei wrote: I realize it's

Jinkei wrote:

I realize it's a bit self-congratulatory, but I reached 100 million yesterday! Here's to all the diligent number crunchers out there!

Good Job!!  There's nothing wrong with being "self-congratulatory" on reaching 100 million!

George

Proud member of the Old Farts Association

Comment viewing options

Select your preferred way to display the comments and click "Save settings" to activate your changes.