Show your O2MD GPU runtimes

Forums › Cruncher's Corner

Stef
Stef
Joined: 8 Mar 05
Posts: 206
Credit: 110568193
RAC: 0
24 Nov 2019 1:58:53 UTC
Topic 220049
(moderation:
    )

    Contributions are appreciated

    Analysis of 367 verified O2MD GPU work units, v2.02/v2.03

    GPU: Nvidia GTX 1050, single task
    CPU: i5-4460, one extra core reserved
    OS: Linux, Debian testing

    Average runtime: 1046 s
    Min. runtime: 231 s
    Max. runtime: 1364 s
    Standard deviation: 153.6 s

    San-Fernando-Valley
    San-Fernando-Valley
    Joined: 16 Mar 16
    Posts: 383
    Credit: 9926693455
    RAC: 24387685

    Such comparisons don't/won't

    24 Nov 2019 10:18:44 UTC
    Message 174524
    (moderation:
      )

      Such comparisons don't/won't make much sense, since run-times are very dependant on many "other factors".

      So, I take it, this is just for plain fun or out of "curiosity".

      Here you are (just 84 WUs on 2.02) -- nothing special or fancy:

       

      Run-time:  52 WUs  took  545 - 659 s  on  Win10 CPU Xeon 6144  using Titan X(pascal) GPU.

                       Average 604 secs.

       

      Run-time:  32 WUs took  705 - 791 s  on Win7 CPU Xeon e5-2643  using Titan V GPU.

                       Average 719 secs.

       

      GPU WUs seem to generally run faster on Win10 than on Win7  --  I have no idea why.

      CPUs and GPUs are not OV.

      CPUs HT off.

      I will not declare the above values as representative of or for anything.

      Richie
      Richie
      Joined: 7 Mar 14
      Posts: 656
      Credit: 1702989778
      RAC: 0

      Run times today... averages

      25 Nov 2019 13:43:43 UTC
      Message 174555
      (moderation:
        )

        Run times today... averages of "remaining (estimate)" for the tasks in queue. Based on a quick manual observation, times reflect pretty well the reality at the moment:

        * These run times show "how much it is for 1 task", not completion times for the cards running 2x

        AMD R9 390, running 1x ... 820 s / task ... (2 hosts, WIndows 7 & 8,1, can't run tasks in parallel or the second task would enter "sloth mode" and the first task would slow down too, propably a GPU driver thing)

        AMD RX 580, running 2x ... 680 s / task ... (2 hosts, WIndows 10)

        AMD RX 570, running 2x ... 969 s / task ... (WIndows 10) - seems to be running some hefty tasks right now, has been quicker occasionally

        Nvidia GTX 960, running 2x ... 1175 s / task ... (2 hosts, WIndows 10)

        Nvidia GTX 960, running 2x ... 1320 s / task ... (WIndows 8.1)

        ** All hosts above run with Intel Xeon X56xx @ 3.8 GHz

        Nvidia GTX 1060, running 1x ... 870 s / task ... (Windows 7, Intel Q9550 @ 3.6 GHz)

        Stef
        Stef
        Joined: 8 Mar 05
        Posts: 206
        Credit: 110568193
        RAC: 0

        Thanks for the replies. Not a

        25 Nov 2019 23:48:30 UTC
        Message 174563
        (moderation:
          )

          Thanks for the replies. Not a big spread in runtimes across the different cards, it seems. Titan X is not even twice as fast as my GTX 1050?

          Comment viewing options

          Select your preferred way to display the comments and click "Save settings" to activate your changes.

          Forums › Cruncher's Corner