I'm running that in two hosts now (older GTX 760, 670). At least no blue screens, boot loops, corrupted system... so far so good. I updated from version 356.45 which didn't have any problems with these cards.
364.72 is OK on my Geforce GTX 750 OC running both Einstein@home and SETI@home GPU tasks. It gets me far more credits in Einstein on Parkes data than in SETI@home.
Tullio
364.72 is OK on my Geforce GTX 750 OC running both Einstein@home and SETI@home GPU tasks. It gets me far more credits in Einstein on Parkes data than in SETI@home.
Tullio
FWIW if you're not a gamer there is no advantage to updating your drivers for crunching. Until CUDA apps for crunching are updated beyond 6.5 it's not worth the headaches updating could cause. They're using 5.5 here. Remember the 295 and 296 driver fiasco? JMHO.
There's also 364.91:
)
There's also 364.91: https://forums.geforce.com/default/topic/929940/geforce-drivers/new-vulkan-driver-364-91-released/
I'm running that in two hosts now (older GTX 760, 670). At least no blue screens, boot loops, corrupted system... so far so good. I updated from version 356.45 which didn't have any problems with these cards.
364.72 is OK on my Geforce
)
364.72 is OK on my Geforce GTX 750 OC running both Einstein@home and SETI@home GPU tasks. It gets me far more credits in Einstein on Parkes data than in SETI@home.
Tullio
RE: 364.72 is OK on my
)
FWIW if you're not a gamer there is no advantage to updating your drivers for crunching. Until CUDA apps for crunching are updated beyond 6.5 it's not worth the headaches updating could cause. They're using 5.5 here. Remember the 295 and 296 driver fiasco? JMHO.