Functional for Einstein Haswell display drivers wanted

Rantanplan
Rantanplan
Joined: 13 Dec 08
Posts: 87
Credit: 100633285
RAC: 0
Topic 198479

Hello, i am always getting false drivers for intel. Even with the drivers setup utility i get trash.

BOINC recognizes the gpu , but on the servers log, the download of tasks will be denied, because the device name isnt included with "...Haswell..." drivers name.

I also tried to rename the drivers but failed, they are not digital signated.

The worst is i didnt know the exact name of the itegrated gpu version, it must be Intel(R) HD Graphics 4xxx , but unknown.

Can someone recommend me a 100% funcitional driver for Win7 64bit an crunshing ?

The cpu is Intel(R) Celeron G1820, hope for help.

Richard Haselgrove
Richard Haselgrove
Joined: 10 Dec 05
Posts: 2143
Credit: 2949797102
RAC: 689147

Functional for Einstein Haswell display drivers wanted


According to the Intel specification sheet I've linked, that CPU - in common with most of the Intel CPUs badged 'Celeron' - must be a very cut-down version of the Haswell chip. The key features I picked out were:

Instruction Set Extensions: SSE4.1/4.2 (no AVX?)
Processor Graphics: Intel® HD Graphics (no 4xxx)

Compare with the similar sheet for the Core(TM) i5-4570 CPU that I started with - host 8864187.

My Haswells (also running Windows 7, 64-bit) are very happy with driver 10.18.10.3621, which has this compatibility list:

	4th Generation Intel(R) Core(TM) Processor Platform
	4th Generation Intel(R) Core(TM) Processor U Series-based Platform
	4th Generation Intel(R) Core(TM) Processor Y Series-based Platform
	3rd Generation Intel(R) Core(TM) Processor Platform
	3rd Generation Intel(R) Core(TM) Processor U Series-based Platform
	3rd Generation Intel(R) Core(TM) Processor Y Series-based Platform
	Intel(R) Pentium(TM) Processor  2000/A1000/G2000/G2100 Series  
	Intel(R) Celeron(TM) Processor 900/1000/G1000 Series
	Intel(R) Pentium(R) N3510/ 3520 Processor 
     	Intel(R) Celeron(R) N2810/ 2820 Processor 
               Intel(R) Celeron(R) N2910/ 2920 Processor 
     	Intel(R) Celeron(R) N2805/ N2806 Processor
      	Intel(R) Celeron(R) N2815 Processor
     	Intel(R) Pentium(R) J2850/ J2900 Processor
    	Intel(R) Celeron(R) J1850/ J1900 Processor
     	Intel(R) Celeron(R) J1750/ J1800 Processor 


That 'G1000 Series' suggests you might be in luck: the download url is

http://downloadmirror.intel.com/23885/a08/win64_153322.zip

Unpack the .zip, try running setup.exe

If that fails, look for the file 'Installation_Readme.txt' (not plain readme.txt), and follow the manual installation unstructions - the section titled "Microsoft Windows* "Have Disk" Installation" has overcome every problem I've ever encountered, on five systems now.

Edit - to complete the picture, in the hope that this may become a useful reference thread: the Einstein Windows applications like this driver, but have a curious quirk: although they use very little CPU time, they very much like to have a CPU available in support - either keep an entire CPU core free (a big ask on a dual core CPU), or peg the Einstein intel_gpu application to real-time priority ( ! unusual, but it works for these two apps only) using a utility like Process Lasso.

Rantanplan
Rantanplan
Joined: 13 Dec 08
Posts: 87
Credit: 100633285
RAC: 0

Well thanks for the effords u

Well thanks for the effords u made.

The first driver results in the same as before:

See the LOG link.

https://einsteinathome.org/host_sched_logs/12209/12209420

I´ll try the second one. even that didn´t work, its always the device name that isn´t right.

Richard Haselgrove
Richard Haselgrove
Joined: 10 Dec 05
Posts: 2143
Credit: 2949797102
RAC: 689147

RE: https://einsteinathome.


[version] Checking plan class 'BRP4G-Beta-opencl-intel_gpu'
[version] parsed project prefs setting 'gpu_util_brp': 1.000000
[version] Intel GPU device name: 'Intel(R) HD Graphics' doesn't match 'HD Graphics [4-9]|HD Graphics Haswell'
[version] no app version available: APP#25 (einsteinbinary_BRP4G) PLATFORM#9 (windows_x86_64) min_version 0
[version] no app version available: APP#25 (einsteinbinary_BRP4G) PLATFORM#2 (windows_intelx86) min_version 0
[version] Checking plan class 'BRP6-Beta-opencl-intel_gpu'
[version] parsed project prefs setting 'gpu_util_brp': 1.000000
[version] Intel GPU device name: 'Intel(R) HD Graphics' doesn't match 'HD Graphics [4-9]|HD Graphics Haswell'


OK, that's the project protecting itself against all the weird and not-so-wonderful CPU/driver combinations out there - many return rubbish science, and the project staff haven't got the time to test and verify each combination.

I suppose the next step would be to wrap the application up in anonymous platform (app_info.xml), and bypass the plan class selection that way. Are you up for that, under guidance?

The object of the exercise would be to test, slowly and carefully under controlled conditions, whether the GPU returns valid science with a known good driver like .3621

Rantanplan
Rantanplan
Joined: 13 Dec 08
Posts: 87
Credit: 100633285
RAC: 0

Well thanks, but that is to

Well thanks, but that is to complicated for me, even to understand english writing.

That all will give me a big headache , that i won´t wanna have.

Cheers, and have a good day, i am out. If anyone want to continue, lets get on it.

Richard Haselgrove
Richard Haselgrove
Joined: 10 Dec 05
Posts: 2143
Credit: 2949797102
RAC: 689147

Fair enough. I'll wait and

Fair enough. I'll wait and see if anybody else with the right hardware comes along and takes me up on it.

Rantanplan
Rantanplan
Joined: 13 Dec 08
Posts: 87
Credit: 100633285
RAC: 0

Before it becomes more

Before it becomes more embarrassing...

8086-0152

Thats the device name over the software gpu-z. It says its an HD 2500 gpu, any cunshing funcionality existent ?

And yes , the cpu supports AVX (but not the second version).

Richard Haselgrove
Richard Haselgrove
Joined: 10 Dec 05
Posts: 2143
Credit: 2949797102
RAC: 689147

I'm a little suspicious of

I'm a little suspicious of that number. HD 2500 is a valid Intel GPU name, but it belongs with the older, Ivy Bridge, generation of chips - which did indeed support AVX, but AVX didn't seem to be present in your server contact log. I'd be more inclined to believe Intel's report based on the model number, especially if you think you've been sold a Haswell.

Mumak
Joined: 26 Feb 13
Posts: 325
Credit: 3506623042
RAC: 1845238

That ID (8086-0152) is the

That ID (8086-0152) is the Ivy Bridge-DT GT1 graphics - so the low(est) end GPU, of the Core 3rd generation.
Try HWiNFO and you should get accurate information about your CPU and its iGPU including codenames...

-----

Rantanplan
Rantanplan
Joined: 13 Dec 08
Posts: 87
Credit: 100633285
RAC: 0

The problem was , here are 2

The problem was , here are 2 pcs running on HDMI, just switched them.

8086-0402

http://gpu.userbenchmark.com/SpeedTest/7701/IntelR-HD-Graphics

It realy cames along the name "Intel(R) HD Graphics" thats all.

NO avx support, earlyer posts of others where right.

Its realy embarrassing , no avx...but thats must be the point.

Richard Haselgrove
Richard Haselgrove
Joined: 10 Dec 05
Posts: 2143
Credit: 2949797102
RAC: 689147

Don't worry about the AVX - I

Don't worry about the AVX - I just mentioned that to help distinguish the different processors. It's a CPU feature, and has no bearing on your original question about display (GPU) drivers.

I see three Windows computers on your account with Intel GPUs:

Host 12209420: Intel(R) Celeron(R) CPU G1820, INTEL Intel(R) HD Graphics (580MB)
(I think that's the one we started with)

Host 12199868: Intel(R) Core(TM) i5-3550 CPU, INTEL Intel(R) HD Graphics 2500 (580MB)
(That'll be the Ivy Bridge with AVX)

Host 12188903: also Intel(R) Core(TM) i5-3550 CPU, INTEL Intel(R) HD Graphics 2500 (580MB)
(possibly a duplicate record for the one above)

You also have a 'INTEL Intel(R) HD Graphics Haswell GT1 Desktop (2048MB)' running under Linux, but that's outside my skill-set.

Both the i5-3550 and the G1820 should be compatible with that 10.18.10.3621 driver I linked for you earlier. That should give you two systems capable of running the Einstein science programs. From that point forward, it's a question of persuading the scheduler to allocate work in response to your requests - and for the time being, that seems to require the use of the anonymous platform mechanism, until some project staff time becomes available to re-examine the whole intel_gpu and driver mess.

Comment viewing options

Select your preferred way to display the comments and click "Save settings" to activate your changes.