new nvidia driver

Anonymous
Topic 197760

This is advertised as a "GeForce Game Ready Driver" - version 344.48.

here is what it brings to the effort:

The new GeForce Game Ready driver, release 344.48 WHQL, allows GeForce owners to continue to have the ultimate gaming experience. This driver brings support for Dynamic Super Resolution (DSR) to Kepler and Fermi desktop GPUs. In addition, this Game Ready WHQL driver ensures you'll have the best possible gaming experience for the latest new blockbuster titles including Lords of the Fallen, Civilization: Beyond Earth, and Elite: Dangerous.

Stranger7777
Stranger7777
Joined: 17 Mar 05
Posts: 436
Credit: 428962356
RAC: 75748

new nvidia driver

This driver brings also new incompatibilities. It doesn't support "old" cards (I guess below 450) and doesn't run on WinXP anymore. I had to install an older driver in dual cards config with 750Ti and 9600GT. I've found no difference in compute time in old and new driver.

cliff
cliff
Joined: 15 Feb 12
Posts: 176
Credit: 283452444
RAC: 0

Hi, None of the NV drivers

Hi,
None of the NV drivers from the newer set for the GTX 980/920 support older cards, and older drivers will not install for those cards. The newer drivers seem to 'break' the ability of some [none e@h & s@h] programs that use CUDA to process information.

Seems Nvidia had depreciated some older attributes of CUDA.

Regards,

Cliff,

Been there, Done that, Still no damm T Shirt.

David S
David S
Joined: 6 Dec 05
Posts: 2473
Credit: 22936222
RAC: 0

RE: This driver brings also

Quote:
This driver brings also new incompatibilities. It doesn't support "old" cards (I guess below 450) and doesn't run on WinXP anymore. I had to install an older driver in dual cards config with 750Ti and 9600GT. I've found no difference in compute time in old and new driver.


Then I guess I'm stuck at 334.whatever forever. One box has a 440 and the other is XP.

David

Miserable old git
Patiently waiting for the asteroid with my name on it.

ExtraTerrestrial Apes
ExtraTerrestria...
Joined: 10 Nov 04
Posts: 770
Credit: 576036901
RAC: 186456

RE: Then I guess I'm stuck

Quote:
Then I guess I'm stuck at 334.whatever forever. One box has a 440 and the other is XP.


Nope. The 440 is a Fermi, for which the support end has not yet been announced. The latest driver to support "legacy" cards like that 9600GT mentioned in this thread is supposed to be the 340 branch. It may recieve some more critical updates, but nothing more.

MrS

Scanning for our furry friends since Jan 2002

archae86
archae86
Joined: 6 Dec 05
Posts: 3157
Credit: 7212774931
RAC: 978405

I'm preparing to "upgrade" a

I'm preparing to "upgrade" a box with a single GTX 660 card with two 750s, which I hope to be a bit more Einstein compute capability at a bit less power.

As part of preparation, I went driver shopping, and found that the current offered driver for the 750 is:

344.60 WHQL, released November 4, 2014.

Has anyone got Einstein observations on that one yet?

Jim1348
Jim1348
Joined: 19 Jan 06
Posts: 463
Credit: 257957147
RAC: 0

RE: I'm preparing to

Quote:

I'm preparing to "upgrade" a box with a single GTX 660 card with two 750s, which I hope to be a bit more Einstein compute capability at a bit less power.

As part of preparation, I went driver shopping, and found that the current offered driver for the 750 is:

344.60 WHQL, released November 4, 2014.

Has anyone got Einstein observations on that one yet?


I have two GTX 750 Ti's, each supported by a virtual Haswell core (Win7 64-bit), and have been very happy with the times, about 52 1/2 minutes for BRP4G (Aricebo), and 2 hours 32 minutes for BRP5 (Perseus). I am using the 340.52 driver, which seems to give the same results as 344.11, and probably 344.60.
http://einsteinathome.org/host/11671653/tasks&offset=0&show_names=1&state=3&appid=0

I run only one work unit at a time. You could do more, but might pick up errors and load down the PCIe bus; I generally avoid it. The BRP4Gs run at 85% GPU load, while the BRP5s use 92%.

The power is amazing: The BRP4Gs use 48% TDP, or 29 watts, and the BRP5s use 32 watts; you should probably add about 5 watts static (idle) power to these as I recall.

You can do about as well on HD 7790 cards on output, but the power will be double, though still not that much.

Comment viewing options

Select your preferred way to display the comments and click "Save settings" to activate your changes.