Inconsistent credit
13 Sep 2011 11:25:52 UTC
Topic 195966
(moderation:
Why the difference in granted credit compared to run time and CPU time?
Run time.......CPU time.......Claim cr..Granted cr..... Application
35,695.70.....33,605.19......138.60.....200.00....Gamma-ray pulsar search #1 v0.23
22,677.98.....21,377.33........74.97.....251.15....Gravitational Wave S6 GC search v1.01 (SSE2)
Inconsistent credit
)
Here you can follow the discussion and solution of your question
http://einsteinathome.org/node/195841&sort=5
RE: Here you can follow the
)
Thank you for pointing the OP to the credit increase announcement. Your link sorts the thread from newest to oldest so the OP can see the announcement first and, if he keeps reading, he could see some of the earlier discussion.
I actually find reading threads this way to be quite confusing - sort of 'backwards' :-). I like to have the message board software dump me at the oldest unviewed message and then I can read forward and more easily follow the discussion. So if the OP would like to see others who have also made the comment about the low 'rate of return', he could start with this message which was posted over a month ago and read forwards from that point. Not only would he see other comments about credit but also he would catch up with the fact that until recently this app has been under test and with the final upgrade from version 0.22 to 0.23, it has now been deemed 'fit for production'. He would also notice the comments about the significant speed-up in the app which also helped to improve the credit situation. Finally, he would come to Bernd's announcement that, with the benefit of accumulated statistics, the credit imbalance has been rectified.
Cheers,
Gary.
Though let's be honest, with
)
Though let's be honest, with a summary that good there's probably no real reason for him to go there anymore :)
RE: ... a summary that good
)
Thank you! :-).
Cheers,
Gary.
I am still getting 200
)
I am still getting 200 credits for my gamma-ray searches. Are they old stuff?
Tullio
Yes, all of them are old.
)
Yes, all of them are old. Check the timestamps. The most recent FGRP WU you have was created at 13 Sep 2011 8:01:23 UTC; Bernd's post was made several hours later at 13 Sep 2011 13:26:02 UTC.
Hopefully they can do a retroactive adjustment for existing WUs.