Inconclusive results

Allen Clifford
Allen Clifford
Joined: 24 Aug 10
Posts: 17
Credit: 827193
RAC: 0

Another of mine is

Another of mine is inconclusive...

So I'm willing to bet at this point if the WU is sent to another CPU my result will be validated, but if it is sent to a GPU the GPU result will be validated.

Which one is actually wrong? Why?

http://einsteinathome.org/workunit/91246842

Rechenkuenstler
Rechenkuenstler
Joined: 22 Aug 10
Posts: 138
Credit: 102567115
RAC: 0

i have 2-3 such tasks per day

i have 2-3 such tasks per day (out of 45). It seems, that the CPU and the GPU version under some circumstances (not always cause there are also matching results from CPU and GPU) produce slightly different results and then it depends, who is the refferee application. Is it CUDA, the GPU results win, is it SSE, then the CPU results win.

But at all ~5% of my overall BRP tasks are invalid and they are all matched against SSE tasks. This is independent from the GPU configuration. On some machines I use app_info file with task sharing on GPU, on others I do not. Inavild ratio is always the same and always the same reason.

mikey
mikey
Joined: 22 Jan 05
Posts: 12687
Credit: 1839093224
RAC: 3758

RE: i have 2-3 such tasks

Quote:

i have 2-3 such tasks per day (out of 45). It seems, that the CPU and the GPU version under some circumstances (not always cause there are also matching results from CPU and GPU) produce slightly different results and then it depends, who is the refferee application. Is it CUDA, the GPU results win, is it SSE, then the CPU results win.

But at all ~5% of my overall BRP tasks are invalid and they are all matched against SSE tasks. This is independent from the GPU configuration. On some machines I use app_info file with task sharing on GPU, on others I do not. Inavild ratio is always the same and always the same reason.

This SHOULD NOT happen!! The Admins need to fix this, if you send a unit to both types of processors both should validate each other! Normally the problem is that gpu's don't have the math precision that cpu's do, but this should be accounted for when they send units to both types of processors for crunching! Have you pm'd an Admin about this?

Mike Hewson
Mike Hewson
Moderator
Joined: 1 Dec 05
Posts: 6588
Credit: 317298357
RAC: 366024

RE: This SHOULD NOT

Quote:
This SHOULD NOT happen!! The Admins need to fix this, if you send a unit to both types of processors both should validate each other! Normally the problem is that gpu's don't have the math precision that cpu's do, but this should be accounted for when they send units to both types of processors for crunching! Have you pm'd an Admin about this?


The cross validation problems are being looked at quite actively at present.

Cheers, Mike.

I have made this letter longer than usual because I lack the time to make it shorter ...

... and my other CPU is a Ryzen 5950X :-) Blaise Pascal

joe areeda
joe areeda
Joined: 13 Dec 10
Posts: 285
Credit: 320378898
RAC: 0

Is there a wiki page or other

Is there a wiki page or other description of what exactly these programs are calculating. I'm just curious about what the input/output data looks like and how it's validated.

Not that I could help, more a question of if I can understand.

Joe

Michael Karlinsky
Michael Karlinsky
Joined: 22 Jan 05
Posts: 888
Credit: 23502182
RAC: 0

RE: Is there a wiki page or

Quote:

Is there a wiki page or other description of what exactly these programs are calculating. I'm just curious about what the input/output data looks like and how it's validated.

Not that I could help, more a question of if I can understand.

Joe

Hi,

you could start reading the papers listed under "Science information and progress reports" on the E@H homepage.

Michael

joe areeda
joe areeda
Joined: 13 Dec 10
Posts: 285
Credit: 320378898
RAC: 0

RE: Hi, you could start

Quote:

Hi,

you could start reading the papers listed under "Science information and progress reports" on the E@H homepage.

Michael

Thanks Michael!

dunx
dunx
Joined: 13 Aug 10
Posts: 119
Credit: 53470527
RAC: 0

Now up to 88 ! dunx

Now up to 88 !

dunx

mikey
mikey
Joined: 22 Jan 05
Posts: 12687
Credit: 1839093224
RAC: 3758

RE: Now up to 88 ! dunx

Quote:

Now up to 88 !

dunx

Are these just BRP tasks? If so you might consider unselecting them as being able to be crunched by your machine for a bit, at least until they fix the problem.

Grutte Pier [Wa Oars]~MAB The Frisian
Grutte Pier [Wa...
Joined: 18 Jan 10
Posts: 47
Credit: 1640778
RAC: 0

What happens with the

What happens with the following WU http://einsteinathome.org/workunit/91506495 ?

Not send, failure during completion, completed - control inconclusive and completed - control inconclusive.

Send out againd and what if the outcome is equal to mine or someebody else's ?

Comment viewing options

Select your preferred way to display the comments and click "Save settings" to activate your changes.