Broken WU?

DanNeely
DanNeely
Joined: 4 Sep 05
Posts: 1364
Credit: 3562358667
RAC: 0
Topic 195403

16 validate errors and counting on this one, it was sent in early September so it shouldn't be one of the buggy 10xABP2 WUs.

http://einsteinathome.org/workunit/81836580

Holmis
Joined: 4 Jan 05
Posts: 1118
Credit: 1055935564
RAC: 0

Broken WU?

I've also got one similar to this, 14 validate errors so far on the same unit.
First issued on September 8.

http://einsteinathome.org/workunit/81836516

Edit:
At least one has reached the state of "Too many total results"

http://einsteinathome.org/workunit/81836521

DanNeely
DanNeely
Joined: 4 Sep 05
Posts: 1364
Credit: 3562358667
RAC: 0

Checked the rest of my

Checked the rest of my computers, I've got 3 more. I only spotted the first because I was checking out a newly repaired system to make sure it was stable.

http://einsteinathome.org/workunit/82133285

http://einsteinathome.org/workunit/82133436

http://einsteinathome.org/workunit/82133485

mikey
mikey
Joined: 22 Jan 05
Posts: 12663
Credit: 1839063224
RAC: 4275

RE: Edit: At least one has

Quote:

Edit:
At least one has reached the state of "Too many total results"

http://einsteinathome.org/workunit/81836521

Yes that one has 21 different pc's it was sent out to, that is more than the 20 allowed so has 'too many total results'. Call me silly but that seems like a project error not a user problem, but I am just a user so may not have all the facts.

Bernd Machenschalk
Bernd Machenschalk
Moderator
Administrator
Joined: 15 Oct 04
Posts: 4312
Credit: 250226353
RAC: 35937

These are workunits of the

These are workunits of the type mentioned in this post. The changes in the ABP validator were meant to fix this, but apparently there is s case which isn't covered. Yes, this is a problem of the project.

BM

Edit: I'm currently working on a new workunit generator that is meant to avoid these problems.

BM

mikey
mikey
Joined: 22 Jan 05
Posts: 12663
Credit: 1839063224
RAC: 4275

RE: These are workunits of

Quote:

These are workunits of the type mentioned in this post. The changes in the ABP validator were meant to fix this, but apparently there is s case which isn't covered. Yes, this is a problem of the project.

BM

Edit: I'm currently working on a new workunit generator that is meant to avoid these problems.

Thanks we really do appreciate what you do!

Comment viewing options

Select your preferred way to display the comments and click "Save settings" to activate your changes.