Windows S5R4 App 6.09 available for Beta Test

Byron S Goodgame
Byron S Goodgame
Joined: 16 Jan 06
Posts: 187
Credit: 56581
RAC: 0

ME OS AMD Duron did this 6.09

ME OS AMD Duron did this 6.09 task, all went well. Time 27:21:47

Holmis
Joined: 4 Jan 05
Posts: 1118
Credit: 1055935564
RAC: 0

RE: ME OS AMD Duron did

Message 88873 in response to message 88872

Quote:
ME OS AMD Duron did this 6.09 task, all went well. Time 27:21:47

Had a look at the stderr output on your task and noticed this:

AllocateAndInitializeSid Error 120
failed to create shared mem segment
2008-12-08 03:10:37.1900 [normal]: WARNING: Couldn't set up communication with graphics process

Looks a bit odd.
Is it a problem with that machine or the app?

Byron S Goodgame
Byron S Goodgame
Joined: 16 Jan 06
Posts: 187
Credit: 56581
RAC: 0

RE: RE: ME OS AMD Duron

Message 88874 in response to message 88873

Quote:
Quote:
ME OS AMD Duron did this 6.09 task, all went well. Time 27:21:47

Had a look at the stderr output on your task and noticed this:

AllocateAndInitializeSid Error 120
failed to create shared mem segment
2008-12-08 03:10:37.1900 [normal]: WARNING: Couldn't set up communication with graphics process

Looks a bit odd.
Is it a problem with that machine or the app?


I'm assuming it's not a problem with the app or the pc, since it did that with 6.04 stock app. Never thoght of it as a problem since I don't use the graphics, but I always thought it had to do with the OS. I will admit though the graphics drivers for this pc are just what came on the cd for the MB.

Byron S Goodgame
Byron S Goodgame
Joined: 16 Jan 06
Posts: 187
Credit: 56581
RAC: 0

Finished another 6.09 task

Finished another 6.09 task AMD64 3800+ Time 12:59:24

ulenz
ulenz
Joined: 22 Jan 05
Posts: 27
Credit: 17897764
RAC: 0

Everything is working fine

Everything is working fine running Vista 64 bit Ultimate..............

Intel Q9300 Quadcore, 2500 Mhz, 4096 MB RAM, GeForce 9800 GT, Vista Ultimate 64-bit, Ubuntu 10.10 64 bit

Byron S Goodgame
Byron S Goodgame
Joined: 16 Jan 06
Posts: 187
Credit: 56581
RAC: 0

One more ME 6.09 task

One more ME 6.09 task

RandyC
RandyC
Joined: 18 Jan 05
Posts: 6686
Credit: 111139797
RAC: 0

I haven't seen this behavior

I haven't seen this behavior before: beginning at skypoint 234 it goes all the way to skypoint 268 before it takes another checkpoint. After that, it goes from 269 to 288 before the next checkpoint. The rest seem more or less normal.

This was on a switch-over WU. The first 16 skypoints processed by 6.07, then switched to 6.09.

Seti Classic Final Total: 11446 WU.

Bikeman (Heinz-Bernd Eggenstein)
Bikeman (Heinz-...
Moderator
Joined: 28 Aug 06
Posts: 3522
Credit: 758549766
RAC: 1145602

RE: I haven't seen this

Message 88879 in response to message 88878

Quote:

I haven't seen this behavior before: beginning at skypoint 234 it goes all the way to skypoint 268 before it takes another checkpoint. After that, it goes from 269 to 288 before the next checkpoint. The rest seem more or less normal.

This was on a switch-over WU. The first 16 skypoints processed by 6.07, then switched to 6.09.

Hmm...could this be related to Windows correcting the real-time clock setting from a time server at that tmoment during the computation?

CU
Bikeman

Huff
Huff
Joined: 5 Jan 06
Posts: 36
Credit: 1378476
RAC: 0

Just ran through 8 of these

Just ran through 8 of these with nary a glitch
http://einsteinathome.org/host/1618644

Richard Haselgrove
Richard Haselgrove
Joined: 10 Dec 05
Posts: 2143
Credit: 2978464235
RAC: 783322

Go Celeron! Here is task

Go Celeron! Here is task 110603248 - the MMX/W98 testbed.

Started with v6.04, switched to v6.07 to test the 'rename checkpoint' bug, completed with v6.08 to confirm the bugfix. And validated!

Comment viewing options

Select your preferred way to display the comments and click "Save settings" to activate your changes.