Why Such Low Credit On New WU's ?

Forums › Cruncher's Corner

BdyGlv
BdyGlv
Joined: 22 Apr 06
Posts: 1
Credit: 491414
RAC: 0
6 Aug 2008 0:26:31 UTC
Topic 193812
(moderation:
    )

    Anyone else getting have the credit for WU's taking twice as long?

    CPU time (sec) claimed credit granted credit task
    24,700.91 58.71 171.44 _S5R4a_3
    14,415.92 237.42 237.42 _S5R3b_0

    Using MacPro 8core 2.8g, stock app 6.01

    hoarfrost
    hoarfrost
    Joined: 9 Feb 05
    Posts: 207
    Credit: 103053349
    RAC: 0

    Why Such Low Credit On New WU's ?

    6 Aug 2008 1:10:46 UTC
    Message 83570
    (moderation:
      )

      Another WU: 42233443 ~ 1/7 of S5R3. :-)

      Stefan
      Stefan
      Joined: 15 Nov 05
      Posts: 52
      Credit: 761198
      RAC: 0

      Same here:

      6 Aug 2008 1:29:29 UTC
      Message 83571 in response to message 83570
      (moderation:
        )

        Same here: http://einsteinathome.org/workunit/42203520

        Twice as long and the credit went down...I wouldn't mind if the credit stayed the same as before, decreasing it is a bit of a bummer. But I'll still crunch...

        Human Stupidity Is Infinite...

        roadrunner_gs
        roadrunner_gs
        Joined: 7 Mar 06
        Posts: 94
        Credit: 3369656
        RAC: 0

        S5R4 search progress Total

        6 Aug 2008 2:54:12 UTC
        Message 83572
        (moderation:
          ) 

          S5R4 search progress
Total needed ------- Already done ---- Work still remaining
12,104,080 units --- 104,167 units --- 11,999,913 units
100 % -------------- 0.861 % --------- 99.139 %
37003.9 days ------- 318.5 days ------ 36685.4 days (estimated)

          100 Years?
          Woah!

          By the way: It was announced the credit would go down in S5R4, 80% with approximately doubled runtime is okay in my opinion.
          Optimization of apps - though not as much as in S5R3 - must be taken into account also as much as faster CPUs in the course of the S5R4 run.

          Mike Hewson
          Mike Hewson
          Moderator
          Joined: 1 Dec 05
          Posts: 6588
          Credit: 314185871
          RAC: 260386

          RE: S5R4 search

          6 Aug 2008 3:04:24 UTC
          Message 83573 in response to message 83572
          (moderation:
            )

            Quote:
            S5R4 search progress
Total needed ------- Already done ---- Work still remaining
12,104,080 units --- 104,167 units --- 11,999,913 units
100 % -------------- 0.861 % --------- 99.139 %
37003.9 days ------- 318.5 days ------ 36685.4 days (estimated)

            100 Years?
            Woah!

            By the way: It was announced the credit would go down in S5R4, 80% with approximately doubled runtime is okay in my opinion.
            Optimization of apps - though not as much as in S5R3 - must be taken into account also as much as faster CPUs in the course of the S5R4 run.


            That does look suspiciously like a factor of ten, or two, out on some code line, but we'll see .... :-)

            Cheers, Mike.

            I have made this letter longer than usual because I lack the time to make it shorter ...

            ... and my other CPU is a Ryzen 5950X :-) Blaise Pascal

            hoarfrost
            hoarfrost
            Joined: 9 Feb 05
            Posts: 207
            Credit: 103053349
            RAC: 0

            RE: RE: S5R4 search

            6 Aug 2008 3:17:16 UTC
            Message 83574 in response to message 83573
            (moderation:
              )

              Quote:
              Quote:
              S5R4 search progress
Total needed ------- Already done ---- Work still remaining
12,104,080 units --- 104,167 units --- 11,999,913 units
100 % -------------- 0.861 % --------- 99.139 %
37003.9 days ------- 318.5 days ------ 36685.4 days (estimated)

              100 Years?
              Woah!

              By the way: It was announced the credit would go down in S5R4, 80% with approximately doubled runtime is okay in my opinion.
              Optimization of apps - though not as much as in S5R3 - must be taken into account also as much as faster CPUs in the course of the S5R4 run.


              That does look suspiciously like a factor of ten, or two, out on some code line, but we'll see .... :-)

              Cheers, Mike.


              May be: (317 [from S5R3] + 1.5 [from S5R4]) / 0.00865 = 36820
              :-)

              Quote:
              By the way: It was announced the credit would go down in S5R4, 80% with approximately doubled runtime is okay in my opinion.


              Has looked other results (with claimed and granted credit) - "Claimed" != "Granted" and granted near 192 CS. It's OK.

              roadrunner_gs
              roadrunner_gs
              Joined: 7 Mar 06
              Posts: 94
              Credit: 3369656
              RAC: 0

              Yes, up to now only a few

              6 Aug 2008 3:21:06 UTC
              Message 83575
              (moderation:
                )

                Yes, up to now only a few S5R4 are being distributed, crunched and returned.
                But with the same clients and development of CPU- and App-Performance this run should last nearly thrice as long as S5R3.

                My latest achievement: 50776 s on Pentium M 1600 under linux.
                S5R3 was around 29000 - 30000 s with the linux-power-apps.

                DanNeely
                DanNeely
                Joined: 4 Sep 05
                Posts: 1364
                Credit: 3562358667
                RAC: 0

                Wow. I'm glad I cut down my

                6 Aug 2008 3:36:20 UTC
                Message 83576
                (moderation:
                  )

                  Wow. I'm glad I cut down my quota before switching the new app_info in, S5R4's are estimating 1/3rd as long as the R3s.

                  Mike Hewson
                  Mike Hewson
                  Moderator
                  Joined: 1 Dec 05
                  Posts: 6588
                  Credit: 314185871
                  RAC: 260386

                  RE: Wow. I'm glad I cut

                  6 Aug 2008 3:50:23 UTC
                  Message 83577 in response to message 83576
                  (moderation:
                    )

                    Quote:
                    Wow. I'm glad I cut down my quota before switching the new app_info in, S5R4's are estimating 1/3rd as long as the R3s.


                    My estimates ( in seconds ) for one machine are rather varied:

                    S5R3 ( 4.26 app, 1167.80 freq, 406 seq ) 76980 ( actual, has completed )

                    S5R4 ( 6.04 app, 228.4 freq, 45 seq ) 94080 ( estimate, when completed )

                    S5R4 ( 6.04 app, 228.4 freq, 22 seq ) 34560 ( estimate, when completed )

                    Cheers, Mike.

                    I have made this letter longer than usual because I lack the time to make it shorter ...

                    ... and my other CPU is a Ryzen 5950X :-) Blaise Pascal

                    Stefan
                    Stefan
                    Joined: 15 Nov 05
                    Posts: 52
                    Credit: 761198
                    RAC: 0

                    RE: S5R4 search

                    6 Aug 2008 4:23:33 UTC
                    Message 83578 in response to message 83572
                    (moderation:
                      )

                      Quote:
                      S5R4 search progress
Total needed ------- Already done ---- Work still remaining
12,104,080 units --- 104,167 units --- 11,999,913 units
100 % -------------- 0.861 % --------- 99.139 %
37003.9 days ------- 318.5 days ------ 36685.4 days (estimated)

                      100 Years?
                      Woah!

                      By the way: It was announced the credit would go down in S5R4, 80% with approximately doubled runtime is okay in my opinion.
                      Optimization of apps - though not as much as in S5R3 - must be taken into account also as much as faster CPUs in the course of the S5R4 run.

                      Hopefully a factor of 10 is off on that estimation!

                      I haven't been keeping up to date with credits and the S5R4 run but if they announced it beforehand that's fine.

                      Seems to be a general trend to cut back on the credits lately on projects and increase WU's, gearing it more towards the science! :)

                      And for the record, looks like I've had one complete so far, I keep getting old R3...

                      S5R4 32,543 seconds (Core 2 Duo 2.2 Mac Intel) 6.01 app...

                      Human Stupidity Is Infinite...

                      Udo
                      Udo
                      Joined: 19 May 05
                      Posts: 203
                      Credit: 8945570
                      RAC: 0

                      My first new S5R4 WUs had an

                      6 Aug 2008 7:10:12 UTC
                      Message 83579
                      (moderation:
                        )

                        My first new S5R4 WUs had an estimated processing time of 4 hours. But in fact they needed over 21 hours on my "Intel(R) Pentium(R) D CPU 3.00GHz".

                        Now they claim 64 credits (which would be fine for 4 hours but not for more than 20 hours)!
                        See these WUs: 42177544 and 42199540

                        Please adjust the timings / credits...

                        [EDIT]
                        I also just noticed that misscalculating the estimated run time per WU also leads to an overload of the WU chache...
                        An other host of mine, with a work chache of 7 days, loaded new WUs based on the estimated run time of 4.5 hours...
                        but as the WUs are running for more than 20 hours some of the WUs will miss the deadline!

                        I first noticed this behaviour on an wingman of the host I mentioned first in this post... so this will be a general problem of hosts with larger WU caches...
                        [/EDIT]

                        Udo

                        Comment viewing options

                        Select your preferred way to display the comments and click "Save settings" to activate your changes.

                        Forums › Cruncher's Corner