Weird WU 114435712

JoeB
JoeB
Joined: 24 Feb 05
Posts: 124
Credit: 73,777,537
RAC: 20,566
Topic 196150

Hi,
I hate to complain about getting credit, but what happened here??? I don't even know how to describe it!
http://einsteinathome.org/workunit/114435712

Thanks

Joe B

Gary Roberts
Gary Roberts
Moderator
Joined: 9 Feb 05
Posts: 5,574
Credit: 82,165,579,926
RAC: 67,353,324

Weird WU 114435712

Quote:
I hate to complain about getting credit ...


Then don't :-).

Quote:
but what happened here???


Probably nothing bad :-).

Quote:
I don't even know how to describe it!


I assume you are referring to the very low CPU time reported for your task in that quorum?? I've inserted some url tags around your link to make it easier for others to see what you want them to see.


If you follow the link and click on the Task ID of your task (ID=268142321), you will see that a full 9.5 hours was spent crunching that result and as you browse through the entire file, there doesn't seem to be anything amiss. Sometimes CPU time can get misreported if a task stops and is restarted but there doesn't seem to be any evidence of that. Just one of BOINC's little mysteries :-).

Quote:
Thanks


You're welcome!

Cheers,
Gary.

JoeB
JoeB
Joined: 24 Feb 05
Posts: 124
Credit: 73,777,537
RAC: 20,566

Hi Gary, My low cpu time

Hi Gary,
My low cpu time was part of my question, but my wingman showed 0 runtime also.

If boinc does that type of thing occasionally then so be it. What I thought odd was 2 different anomalies in the same wu. If that's OK don't bother even replying.
Thanks

Joe B

Claggy
Claggy
Joined: 29 Dec 06
Posts: 560
Credit: 2,609,903
RAC: 81

RE: Hi Gary, My low cpu

Quote:
Hi Gary,
My low cpu time was part of my question, but my wingman showed 0 runtime also.


Your wingman is running Boinc 5.8.16, that version doesn't report runtime,

Claggy

Comment viewing options

Select your preferred way to display the comments and click "Save settings" to activate your changes.