validate state: initial for almost two weeks

Lt. Cmdr. Daze
Lt. Cmdr. Daze
Joined: 19 Apr 06
Posts: 756
Credit: 82361
RAC: 0
Topic 192360

I had the idea that validation would be done quite fast. But on this WU, both results are reported almost two weeks ago.

Does this make sense, or is this just the result of the server difficulties at that time?

Thanks in advance,
Bert

Somnio ergo sum

clownius
clownius
Joined: 16 Jun 06
Posts: 42
Credit: 2164665
RAC: 0

validate state: initial for almost two weeks

Looks like some sort of validation or credit granting error. If there was any difference between results it would generally issue a third WU which it hasn't. This looks like a good job for someone who like granting credits.

astro-marwil
astro-marwil
Joined: 28 May 05
Posts: 517
Credit: 415733651
RAC: 772196

RE: I had the idea that

Quote:
I had the idea that validation would be done quite fast. But on this WU, both results are reported almost two weeks ago.
Does this make sense, or is this just the result of the server difficulties at that time?
Bert

Don´t worry about long time waiting for validation. I just had a file waiting for 37 day. But this is the only one that took so long since I began 19 month ago. I´m doing some statistics about E@H and my results. So I have a statistics about the waiting time. If there would be a possibility to place this graph here, I could show it. Or you send me your emailaddress, I will send it to you. My address is .

By the way: Is there someone, who can tell me, where to find a discription of this editor and its performances used here ???

Kind regards
MW

Odysseus
Odysseus
Joined: 17 Dec 05
Posts: 372
Credit: 19629108
RAC: 4312

RE: By the way: Is there

Message 60112 in response to message 60111

Quote:
By the way: Is there someone, who can tell me, where to find a discription of this editor and its performances used here ???


Do you mean the BBCode used in these forums? If so, see the Use BBCode tags link beside any message-entry or editing window for a summary of the codes.

Lt. Cmdr. Daze
Lt. Cmdr. Daze
Joined: 19 Apr 06
Posts: 756
Credit: 82361
RAC: 0

RE: RE: I had the idea

Message 60113 in response to message 60111

Quote:
Quote:
I had the idea that validation would be done quite fast. But on this WU, both results are reported almost two weeks ago.
Does this make sense, or is this just the result of the server difficulties at that time?
Bert

Don´t worry about long time waiting for validation. I just had a file waiting for 37 day. But this is the only one that took so long since I began 19 month ago. I´m doing some statistics about E@H and my results. So I have a statistics about the waiting time. If there would be a possibility to place this graph here, I could show it. Or you send me your emailaddress, I will send it to you. My address is .

By the way: Is there someone, who can tell me, where to find a discription of this editor and its performances used here ???

Kind regards
MW


It's quite alright. It has been validated. I'm not sure what you mean by "waiting time". Just to make sure: both results were already reported, but had to wait two weeks before validation took place. I assumed that validation would be done ASAP. I was not wondering about it being pending. I know my results will be credited at a certain point of time (assuming they're worth the credit).

Happy crunching!
Bert

Somnio ergo sum

Fuzzy Duck
Fuzzy Duck
Joined: 3 Dec 05
Posts: 37
Credit: 936924
RAC: 0

I notice this morning that 24

I notice this morning that 24 WU's were sent/reported back to the E@H servers. Many of these WU's already have 2 results reported, to obtain their quorum. However, all these WU's are presently reported as pending. It would seem the validator process may have a problem.

FD.

Daran
Daran
Joined: 3 Oct 06
Posts: 13
Credit: 3007350
RAC: 0

RE: I notice this morning

Message 60115 in response to message 60114

Quote:
I notice this morning that 24 WU's were sent/reported back to the E@H servers. Many of these WU's already have 2 results reported, to obtain their quorum. However, all these WU's are presently reported as pending. It would seem the validator process may have a problem.

Same here, no validation on any of my machines today. Looks like the validator is on vacation. Or the cleaning person was in dire need of a power plug;-)

Daran

GreyCruncher
GreyCruncher
Joined: 2 Sep 06
Posts: 22
Credit: 28664453
RAC: 0

RE: RE: I notice this

Message 60116 in response to message 60115

Quote:
Quote:
I notice this morning that 24 WU's were sent/reported back to the E@H servers. Many of these WU's already have 2 results reported, to obtain their quorum. However, all these WU's are presently reported as pending. It would seem the validator process may have a problem.

Same here, no validation on any of my machines today. Looks like the validator is on vacation. Or the cleaning person was in dire need of a power plug;-)

Daran

Any official News of the project leaders? no. Business as usual *argh*

GC
-one of many

Comment viewing options

Select your preferred way to display the comments and click "Save settings" to activate your changes.